Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Maria Axenovich

Publications and source records attributed to Maria Axenovich.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Bipartite independence number in graphs with bounded maximum degree

We consider a natural, yet seemingly not much studied, extremal problem in bipartite graphs. A bi-hole of size $t$ in a bipartite graph $G$ is a copy of $K_{t, t}$ in the bipartite complement of $G$. Let $f(n, Δ)$ be the largest $k$ for which every $n \times n$ bipartite graph with maximum degree $Δ$ in one of the parts has a bi-hole of size $k$. Determining $f(n, Δ)$ is thus the bipartite analogue of finding the largest independent set in graphs with a given number of vertices and bounded maximum degree. Our main result determines the asymptotic behavior of $f(n, Δ)$. More precisely, we show that for large but fixed $Δ$ and $n$ sufficiently large, $f(n, Δ) = Θ(\frac{\log Δ}Δ n)$. We further address more specific regimes of $Δ$, especially when $Δ$ is a small fixed constant. In particular, we determine $f(n, 2)$ exactly and obtain bounds for $f(n, 3)$, though determining the precise value of $f(n, 3)$ is still open.

math.CO↗

Induced Ramsey number for a star versus a fixed graph

For graphs G and H, let the induced Ramsey number IR(H,G) be the smallest number of vertices in a graph F such that any coloring of the edges of F in red and blue, there is either a red induced copy of H or a blue induced copy of G. In this note we consider the case when G=Sn is a star on n edges, for large n, and H is a fixed graph. We prove that (r-1)n < IR(H, Sn) < (r-1)(r-1)n + cn, for any c>0, sufficiently large n, and r denoting the chromatic number of H. The lower bound is asymptotically tight for any fixed bipartite H. The upper bound is attained up to a constant factor, for example by a clique H.

math.CO↗

Large homogeneous subgraphs in bipartite graphs with forbidden induced subgraphs

For a bipartite graph G, let h(G) be the largest t such that either G or the bipartite complement of G contain K_{t,t}. For a class F of graphs, let h(F)= min {h(G): G\in F}. We say that a bipartite graph H is strongly acyclic if neither H nor its bipartite complement contain a cycle. By Forb(n, H) we denote a set of bipartite graphs with parts of sizes n each, that do not contain H as an induced bipartite subgraph respecting the sides. One can easily show that h(Forb(n,H))= O(n^{1-s}) for a positive s if H is not strongly acyclic. Here, we prove that h(Forb(n, H)) is linear in n for all strongly acyclic graphs except for four graphs.

math.CO↗

Planar Ramsey graphs

We say that a graph $H$ is planar unavoidable if there is a planar graph $G$ such that any red/blue coloring of the edges of $G$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$, otherwise we say that $H$ is planar avoidable. I.e., $H$ is planar unavoidable if there is a Ramsey graph for $H$ that is planar. It follows from the Four-Color Theorem and a result of Gonçalves that if a graph is planar unavoidable then it is bipartite and outerplanar. We prove that the cycle on $4$ vertices and any path are planar unavoidable. In addition, we prove that all trees of radius at most $2$ are planar unavoidable and there are trees of radius $3$ that are planar avoidable. We also address the planar unavoidable notion in more than two colors.

math.CO↗

A note on saturation for Berge-G hypergraphs

For a graph G, a hypergraph H is called Berge-G if there is a hypergraph H', isomorphic to H, containing all vertices of G, so that e is contained in f(e) for each edge e of G, where f is a bijection between E(G) and E(H'). The set of all Berge-G hypergraphs is denoted B(G). A hypergraph H is called Berge-G saturated if it does not contain any subhypergraph from B(G), but adding any new hyperedge of size at least 2 to H creates such a subhypergraph. Each Berge-G saturated hypergraph has at least |E(G)|-1 hyperedges. We show that for each graph G that is not a certain star and for any n at least |V(G)|, there is a Berge-G saturated hypergraph on n vertices and exactly |E(G)|-1 hyperedges. This solves a problem of finding a saturated hypergraph on n vertices with the smallest number of edges exactly.

math.CO↗

A note on Ramsey numbers for Berge-G hyper graphs

For a graph G=(V,E), a hypergraph H is called Berge-G if there is a bijection f from E(G) to E(H) such that for each e in E(G), e is a subset of f(e). The set of all Berge-G hypergraphs is denoted B(G). For integers k>1, r>1, and a graph G, let the Ramsey number R_r(B(G), k) be the smallest integer n such that no matter how the edges of a complete r-uniform n-vertex hypergraph are colored with k colors, there is a copy of a monochromatic Berge-G subhypergraph. Furthermore, let R(B(G),k) be the smallest integer n such that no matter how all subsets an n-element set are colored with k colors, there is a monochromatic copy of a Berge-G hypergraph. We give an upper bound for R_r(B(G),k) in terms of graph Ramsey numbers. In particular, we prove that when G becomes acyclic after removing some vertex, R_r(B(G),k)\le 4k|V(G)|+r-2, in contrast with classical multicolor Ramsey numbers. When G is a triangle or a K_4, we find sharper bounds and some exact results and determine some `small' Ramsey numbers: k/2 - o(k) < R_3(B(K_3)), k) < 3k/4+ o(k), For any odd integer t\neq 3, R(B(K_3),2^t-1)=t+2, 2^{ck} < R_3(B(K_4),k) < e(1+o(1))(k-1)k!, R_3(B(K_3),2)=R_3(B(K_3),3)=5, R_3(B(K_3),4)=6, R_3(B(K_3),5)=7, R_3(B(K_3),6)=8, R_3(B(K_3,8)=9, R_3(B(K_4),2)=6.

math.CO↗

Polychromatic Colorings on the Integers

We show that for any set $S\subseteq \mathbb{Z}$, $|S|=4$ there exists a 3-coloring of $\mathbb{Z}$ in which every translate of $S$ receives all three colors. This implies that $S$ has a codensity of at most $1/3$, proving a conjecture of Newman [D. J. Newman, Complements of finite sets of integers, Michigan Math. J. 14 (1967) 481--486]. We also consider related questions in $\mathbb{Z}^d$, $d\geq 2$.

math.CO↗

On induced Ramsey numbers for multiple copies of graphs

We say that a graph F strongly arrows a pair of graphs (G,H) if any colouring of its edges with red and blue leads to either a red G or a blue H appearing as induced subgraphs of F. The induced Ramsey number, IR(G,H) is defined as the smallest order of a graph that strongly arrows (G,H). We consider the connection between the induced Ramsey number for a pair of two connected graphs IR(G,H) and the induced Ramsey number for multiple copies of these graphs IR(sG,tH), where xG denotes the pairwise vertex-disjoint union of x copies of G. It is easy to see that if F strongly arrow (G,H), then (s+t-1)F strongly arrows (sG, tH). This implies that IR(sG, tH) is at most (s+t-1)IR(G,H). For all known results on induced Ramsey numbers for multiple copies, the inequality above holds as equality. We show that there are infinite classes of graphs for which the inequality above is strict and moreover, IR(sG, tH) could be arbitrarily smaller than (s+t-1)IR(G,H). On the other hand, we provide further examples of classes of graphs for which the inequality above holds as equality.

math.CO↗

Clumsy packings of graphs

Let $G$ and $H$ be graphs. We say that $P$ is an $H$-packing of $G$ if $P$ is a set of edge-disjoint copies of $H$ in $G$. An $H$-packing $P$ is maximal if there is no other $H$-packing of $G$ that properly contains $P$. Packings of maximum cardinality have been studied intensively, with several recent breakthrough results. Here, we consider minimum cardinality maximal packings. An $H$-packing $P$ is clumsy if it is maximal of minimum size. Let $cl(G,H)$ be the size of a clumsy $H$-packing of $G$. We provide nontrivial bounds for $cl(G,H)$, and in many cases asymptotically determine $cl(G,H)$ for some generic classes of graphs $G$ such as $K_n$ (the complete graph), $Q_n$ (the cube graph), as well as square, triangular, and hexagonal grids. We asymptotically determine $cl(K_n,H)$ for every fixed non-empty graph $H$. In particular, we prove that $$ cl(K_n, H) = \frac{\binom{n}{2}- ex(n,H)}{|E(H)|}+o(ex(n,H)),$$ where $ex(n,H)$ is the extremal number of $H$. A related natural parameter is $cov(G,H)$, that is the smallest number of copies of $H$ in $G$ (not necessarily edge-disjoint) whose removal from $G$ results in an $H$-free graph. While clearly $cov(G,H) \le cl(G,H)$, all of our lower bounds for $cl(G,H)$ apply to $cov(G,H)$ as well.

math.CO↗

Induced Saturation of Graphs

A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated for a graph $H$, if $G$ does not contain a copy of $H$ but adding any new edge to $G$ results in such a copy. An $H$-saturated graph on a given number of vertices always exists and the properties of such graphs, for example their highest density, have been studied intensively. A graph $G$ is $H$-induced-saturated if $G$ does not have an induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$, but adding an edge to $G$ from its complement or deleting an edge from $G$ results in an induced copy of $H$. It is not immediate anymore that $H$-induced-saturated graphs exist. In fact, Martin and Smith (2012) showed that there is no $P_4$-induced-saturated graph. Behrens et.al. (2016) proved that if $H$ belongs to a few simple classes of graphs such as a class of odd cycles of length at least $5$, stars of size at least $2$, or matchings of size at least $2$, then there is an $H$-induced-saturated graph. This paper addresses the existence question for $H$-induced-saturated graphs. It is shown that Cartesian products of cliques are $H$-induced-saturated graphs for $H$ in several infinite families, including large families of trees. A complete characterization of all connected graphs $H$ for which a Cartesian product of two cliques is an $H$-induced-saturated graph is given. Finally, several results on induced saturation for prime graphs and families of graphs are provided.

math.CO↗

Induced and Weak Induced Arboricities

We define the induced arboricity of a graph $G$, denoted by ${\rm ia}(G)$, as the smallest $k$ such that the edges of $G$ can be covered with $k$ induced forests in $G$. This notion generalizes the classical notions of the arboricity and strong chromatic index. For a class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs and a graph parameter $p$, let $p(\mathcal{F}) = \sup\{p(G) \mid G\in \mathcal{F}\}$. We show that ${\rm ia}(\mathcal{F})$ is bounded from above by an absolute constant depending only on $\mathcal{F}$, that is ${\rm ia}(\mathcal{F})\neq\infty$ if and only if $χ(\mathcal{F} \nabla \frac{1}{2}) \neq\infty$, where $\mathcal{F} \nabla \frac{1}{2}$ is the class of $\frac{1}{2}$-shallow minors of graphs from $\mathcal{F}$ and $χ$ is the chromatic number. Further, we give bounds on ${\rm ia}(\mathcal{F})$ when $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of planar graphs, the class of $d$-degenerate graphs, or the class of graphs having tree-width at most $d$. Specifically, we show that if $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of planar graphs, then $8 \leq {\rm ia}(\mathcal{F}) \leq 10$. In addition, we establish similar results for so-called weak induced arboricities and star arboricities of classes of graphs.

math.CO↗

The $k$-strong induced arboricity of a graph

The induced arboricity of a graph $G$ is the smallest number of induced forests covering the edges of $G$. This is a well-defined parameter bounded from above by the number of edges of $G$ when each forest in a cover consists of exactly one edge. Not all edges of a graph necessarily belong to induced forests with larger components. For $k\geq 1$, we call an edge $k$-valid if it is contained in an induced tree on $k$ edges. The $k$-strong induced arboricity of $G$, denoted by $f_k(G)$, is the smallest number of induced forests with components of sizes at least $k$ that cover all $k$-valid edges in $G$. This parameter is highly non-monotone. However, we prove that for any proper minor-closed graph class $\mathcal{C}$, and more generally for any class of bounded expansion, and any $k \geq 1$, the maximum value of $f_k(G)$ for $G \in \mathcal{C}$ is bounded from above by a constant depending only on $\mathcal{C}$ and $k$. This implies that the adjacent closed vertex-distinguishing number of graphs from a class of bounded expansion is bounded by a constant depending only on the class. We further prove that $f_2(G) \leq 3\binom{t+1}{3}$ for any graph $G$ of tree-width~$t$ and that $f_k(G) \leq (2k)^d$ for any graph of tree-depth $d$. In addition, we prove that $f_2(G) \leq 310$ when $G$ is planar.

math.CO↗

Polychromatic colorings of complete graphs with respect to 1-,2-factors and Hamiltonian cycles

If G is a graph and H is a set of subgraphs of G, then an edge-coloring of G is called H-polychromatic if every graph from H gets all colors present in G on its edges. The H-polychromatic number of G, denoted poly_H(G), is the largest number of colors in an H-polychromatic coloring. In this paper, poly_H(G) is determined exactly when G is a complete graph and H is the family of all 1-factors. In addition poly_H(G) is found up to an additive constant term when G is a complete graph and H is the family of all 2-factors, or the family of all Hamiltonian cycles.

math.CO↗

Brooks Type Results for Conflict-Free Colorings and {a, b}-factors in graphs

A vertex-coloring of a hypergraph is conflict-free, if each edge contains a vertex whose color is not repeated on any other vertex of that edge. Let $f(r, Δ)$ be the smallest integer $k$ such that each $r$-uniform hypergraph of maximum vertex degree $Δ$ has a conflict-free coloring with at most $k$ colors. As shown by Tardos and Pach, similarly to a classical Brooks' type theorem for hypergraphs, $f(r, Δ)\leq Δ+1$. Compared to Brooks' theorem, according to which there is only a couple of graphs/hypergraphs that attain the $Δ+1$ bound, we show that there are several infinite classes of uniform hypergraphs for which the upper bound is attained. We provide bounds on $f(r, Δ)$ in terms of~$Δ$ for large~$Δ$ and establish the connection between conflict-free colorings and so-called $\{t, r-t\}$-factors in $r$-regular graphs. Here, a $\{t, r-t\}$-factor is a factor in which each degree is either $t$ or $r-t$. Among others, we disprove a conjecture of Akbari and Kano~[Graphs and Combinatorics 30(4):821--826, 2014] stating that there is a $\{t,r-t\}$-factor in every $r$-regular graph for odd $r$ and any odd $t<\frac{r}{3}$.

math.CO↗

The Chromatic Number of Ordered Graphs With Constrained Conflict Graphs

An ordered graph $G$ is a graph whose vertex set is a subset of integers. The edges are interpreted as tuples $(u,v)$ with $u < v$. For a positive integer $s$, a matrix $M \in \mathbb{Z}^{s \times 4}$, and a vector $\mathbf{p} = (p,\ldots,p) \in \mathbb{Z}^s$ we build a conflict graph by saying that edges $(u,v)$ and $(x,y)$ are conflicting if $M(u,v,x,y)^\top \geq \mathbf{p}$ or $M(x,y,u,v)^\top \geq \mathbf{p}$, where the comparison is componentwise. This new framework generalizes many natural concepts of ordered and unordered graphs, such as the page-number, queue-number, band-width, interval chromatic number and forbidden ordered matchings. For fixed $M$ and $p$, we investigate how the chromatic number of $G$ depends on the structure of its conflict graph. Specifically, we study the maximum chromatic number $X_\text{cli}(M,p,w)$ of ordered graphs $G$ with no $w$ pairwise conflicting edges and the maximum chromatic number $X_\text{ind}(M,p,a)$ of ordered graphs $G$ with no $a$ pairwise non-conflicting edges. We determine $X_\text{cli}(M,p,w)$ and $X_\text{ind}(M,p,a)$ exactly whenever $M$ consists of one row with entries in $\{-1,0,+1\}$ and moreover consider several cases in which $M$ consists of two rows or has arbitrary entries from $\mathbb{Z}$.

math.CO↗

High girth hypergraphs with unavoidable monochromatic or rainbow edges

A classical result of Erdős and Hajnal claims that for any integers $k, r, g \geq 2$ there is an $r$-uniform hypergraph of girth at least $g$ with chromatic number at least $k$. This implies that there are sparse hypergraphs such that in any coloring of their vertices with at most $k-1$ colors there is a monochromatic hyperedge. We show that for any integers $r, g\geq 2$ there is an $r$-uniform hypergraph of girth at least $g$ such that in any coloring of its vertices there is either a monochromatic or a rainbow (totally multicolored) edge. We give a probabilistic and a deterministic proof of this result.

math.CO↗

Sub-Ramsey numbers for arithmetic progressions

Let the integers $1,\ldots,n$ be assigned colors. Szemerédi's theorem implies that if there is a dense color class then there is an arithmetic progression of length three in that color. We study the conditions on the color classes forcing totally multicolored arithmetic progressions of length 3. Let $f(n)$ be the smallest integer $k$ such that there is a coloring of $\{1, \ldots, n\}$ without totally multicolored arithmetic progressions of length three and such that each color appears on at most $k$ integers. We provide an exact value for $f(n)$ when $n$ is sufficiently large, and all extremal colorings. In particular, we show that $f(n)= 8n/17 + O(1)$. This completely answers a question of Alon, Caro and Tuza.

math.CO↗

A note on short cycles in a hypercube

How many edges can a quadrilateral-free subgraph of a hypercube have? This question was raised by Paul Erdős about $27$ years ago. His conjecture that such a subgraph asymptotically has at most half the edges of a hypercube is still unresolved. Let $f(n,C_l)$ be the largest number of edges in a subgraph of a hypercube $Q_n$ containing no cycle of length $l$. It is known that $f(n, C_l) = o(|E(Q_n)|)$, when $l= 4k$, $k\geq 2$ and that $f(n, C_6) \geq \frac{1}{3} |E(Q_n)|$. It is an open question to determine $f(n, C_l)$ for $l=4k+2$, $k\geq 2$. Here, we give a general upper bound for $f(n,C_l)$ when $l=4k+2$ and provide a coloring of $E(Q_n)$ by $4$ colors containing no induced monochromatic $C_{10}$.

math.CO↗