arXiv subjects

Maria Teresa Parreira

Publications and source records attributed to Maria Teresa Parreira.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ERR@HRI 3.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Anticipation in Human-Robot Interactions

As robots become increasingly integrated into human environments, their ability to detect and respond to errors remains critical for maintaining user trust and interaction quality. While recent advances in machine learning have improved error detection capabilities, most approaches are limited to specific contexts, controlled settings, or pre-extracted features, limiting their generalizability and applicability to real-world conditions. To address this challenge, the third edition of the ERR@HRI Challenge (ERR@HRI 3.0) provided researchers with two complementary datasets that enable end-to-end innovation in methods for both detecting and preventing errors in human-robot interaction. The challenge offered raw, non-anonymized video data from naturalistic settings: (1) the Bystander Affect Detection (BAD) dataset, containing webcam recordings of 45 participants' spontaneous reactions to robot and human failure scenarios; and (2) the Bad Idea dataset, featuring 29 participants' anticipatory facial responses while predicting action outcomes before failures occur. Both datasets were collected via crowdsourcing, capturing the inherent variability of real-world conditions. This naturalistic variability, while challenging, provides an authentic testbed for developing robust error detection systems. Participants developed multimodal machine learning models for bystander reaction detection (Track 1) and anticipatory outcome prediction (Track 2), with an optional cross-dataset generalization track (Track 3). Three teams submitted valid models, all of which surpassed our convolutional neural network baselines. This paper describes the datasets, tasks, baselines, and results of ERR@HRI 3.0, and discusses implications for building generalizable, context-aware, and anticipatory error detection systems for human-robot interaction.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Visible Adoption, Untracked Contribution: GitHub Evidence of the Accountability Gap Across Three Cohorts of an HCI Prototyping Course

This paper presents a longitudinal, observational case study of how student GenAI adoption shifted across three cohorts (Fall 2022, 2023, and 2025) of the same graduate-level HCI prototyping course, using computational analysis of 203 GitHub repositories with student activity and 23,065 student commits. Building on a prior qualitative study of the 2023 cohort, we distinguish two levels of AI accountability trace: disclosure (naming that an AI tool was used) and attribution (crediting a specific artifact or task to an AI tool). We find that tool disclosure grew from 0% to 66% of repositories across the three cohorts, while explicit contribution attribution remains a minority practice, and the gap between the two reveals where accountability is missing even among students who disclose. By 2025, AI is infrastructure embedded in course templates and student-built devices: students increasingly name the tools they used, but rarely specify what those tools contributed. We argue that disclosure-based frameworks are insufficient for the vibe-coding era. The failure is not that students conceal AI use; it is that a norm built for episodic, identifiable acts cannot capture continuous, ambient co-creation. We offer this case study as grounding for the workshop's conversation about what genuine co-thinking accountability looks like.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Calling for Backup: How Children Navigate Successive Robot Communication Failures

How do children respond to repeated robot errors? While prior research has examined adult reactions to successive robot errors, children's responses remain largely unexplored. In this study, we explore children's reactions to robot social errors and performance errors. For the latter, this study reproduces the successive robot failure paradigm of Liu et al. with child participants (N=59, ages 8-10) to examine how young users respond to repeated robot conversational errors. Participants interacted with a robot that failed to understand their prompts three times in succession, with their behavioral responses video-recorded and analyzed. We found both similarities and differences compared to adult responses from the original study. Like adults, children adjusted their prompts, modified their verbal tone, and exhibited increasingly emotional non-verbal responses throughout successive errors. However, children demonstrated more disengagement behaviors, including temporarily ignoring the robot or actively seeking an adult. Errors did not affect participants' perception of the robot, suggesting more flexible conversational expectations in children. These findings inform the design of more effective and developmentally appropriate human-robot interaction systems for young users.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

"Why the face?": Exploring Robot Error Detection Using Instrumented Bystander Reactions

How do humans recognize and rectify social missteps? We achieve social competence by looking around at our peers, decoding subtle cues from bystanders - a raised eyebrow, a laugh - to evaluate the environment and our actions. Robots, however, struggle to perceive and make use of these nuanced reactions. By employing a novel neck-mounted device that records facial expressions from the chin region, we explore the potential of previously untapped data to capture and interpret human responses to robot error. First, we develop NeckNet-18, a 3D facial reconstruction model to map the reactions captured through the chin camera onto facial points and head motion. We then use these facial responses to develop a robot error detection model which outperforms standard methodologies such as using OpenFace or video data, generalizing well especially for within-participant data. Through this work, we argue for expanding human-in-the-loop robot sensing, fostering more seamless integration of robots into diverse human environments, pushing the boundaries of social cue detection and opening new avenues for adaptable robotics.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Training Models to Detect Successive Robot Errors from Human Reactions

As robots become more integrated into society, detecting robot errors is essential for effective human-robot interaction (HRI). When a robot fails repeatedly, how can it know when to change its behavior? Humans naturally respond to robot errors through verbal and nonverbal cues that intensify over successive failures-from confusion and subtle speech changes to visible frustration and impatience. While prior work shows that human reactions can indicate robot failures, few studies examine how these evolving responses reveal successive failures. This research uses machine learning to recognize stages of robot failure from human reactions. In a study with 26 participants interacting with a robot that made repeated conversational errors, behavioral features were extracted from video data to train models for individual users. The best model achieved 93.5% accuracy for detecting errors and 84.1% for classifying successive failures. Modeling the progression of human reactions enhances error detection and understanding of repeated interaction breakdowns in HRI.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Conversations

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into conversational robots has made human-robot conversations more dynamic. Yet, LLM-powered conversational robots remain prone to errors, e.g., misunderstanding user intent, prematurely interrupting users, or failing to respond altogether. Detecting and addressing these failures is critical for preventing conversational breakdowns, avoiding task disruptions, and sustaining user trust. To tackle this problem, the ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge provides a multimodal dataset of LLM-powered conversational robot failures during human-robot conversations and encourages researchers to benchmark machine learning models designed to detect robot failures. The dataset includes 16 hours of dyadic human-robot interactions, incorporating facial, speech, and head movement features. Each interaction is annotated with the presence or absence of robot errors from the system perspective, and perceived user intention to correct for a mismatch between robot behavior and user expectation. Participants are invited to form teams and develop machine learning models that detect these failures using multimodal data. Submissions will be evaluated using various performance metrics, including detection accuracy and false positive rate. This challenge represents another key step toward improving failure detection in human-robot interaction through social signal analysis.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Co-Designing with Algorithms: Unpacking the Complex Role of GenAI in Interactive System Design Education

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education and technology design, yet its impact remains poorly understood. This study explores how graduate students in an applied HCI course used GenAI tools during interactive device design. Despite no encouragement, all groups integrated GenAI into their workflows. Through 12 post-class group interviews, we identified how GenAI co-design behaviors present both benefits, such as enhanced creativity and faster design iterations, and risks, including shallow learning and reflection. Benefits were most evident during the execution phases, while the discovery and reflection phases showed limited gains. A taxonomy of usage patterns revealed that students' outcomes depended more on how they used GenAI than the specific tasks performed. These findings highlight the need for HCI education to adapt to GenAI's role and offer recommendations for curricula to better prepare future designers for effective creative co-design.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

The Robotability Score: Enabling Harmonious Robot Navigation on Urban Streets

This paper introduces the Robotability Score ($R$), a novel metric that quantifies the suitability of urban environments for autonomous robot navigation. Through expert interviews and surveys, we identify and weigh key features contributing to R for wheeled robots on urban streets. Our findings reveal that pedestrian density, crowd dynamics and pedestrian flow are the most critical factors, collectively accounting for 28% of the total score. Computing robotability across New York City yields significant variation; the area of highest R is 3.0 times more "robotable" than the area of lowest R. Deployments of a physical robot on high and low robotability areas show the adequacy of the score in anticipating the ease of robot navigation. This new framework for evaluating urban landscapes aims to reduce uncertainty in robot deployment while respecting established mobility patterns and urban planning principles, contributing to the discourse on harmonious human-robot environments.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2024

ERR@HRI 2024 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Interactions

Despite the recent advancements in robotics and machine learning (ML), the deployment of autonomous robots in our everyday lives is still an open challenge. This is due to multiple reasons among which are their frequent mistakes, such as interrupting people or having delayed responses, as well as their limited ability to understand human speech, i.e., failure in tasks like transcribing speech to text. These mistakes may disrupt interactions and negatively influence human perception of these robots. To address this problem, robots need to have the ability to detect human-robot interaction (HRI) failures. The ERR@HRI 2024 challenge tackles this by offering a benchmark multimodal dataset of robot failures during human-robot interactions (HRI), encouraging researchers to develop and benchmark multimodal machine learning models to detect these failures. We created a dataset featuring multimodal non-verbal interaction data, including facial, speech, and pose features from video clips of interactions with a robotic coach, annotated with labels indicating the presence or absence of robot mistakes, user awkwardness, and interaction ruptures, allowing for the training and evaluation of predictive models. Challenge participants have been invited to submit their multimodal ML models for detection of robot errors and to be evaluated against various performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, with and without a margin of error reflecting the time-sensitivity of these metrics. The results of this challenge will help the research field in better understanding the robot failures in human-robot interactions and designing autonomous robots that can mitigate their own errors after successfully detecting them.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2024

Using Social Cues to Recognize Task Failures for HRI: Overview, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Robots that carry out tasks and interact in complex environments will inevitably commit errors. Error detection is thus an essential ability for robots to master to work efficiently and productively. People can leverage social feedback to get an indication of whether an action was successful or not. With advances in computing and artificial intelligence (AI), it is increasingly possible for robots to achieve a similar capability of collecting social feedback. In this work, we take this one step further and propose a framework for how social cues can be used as feedback signals to recognize task failures for human-robot interaction (HRI). Our proposed framework sets out a research agenda based on insights from the literature on behavioral science, human-robot interaction, and machine learning to focus on three areas: 1) social cues as feedback (from behavioral science), 2) recognizing task failures in robots (from HRI), and 3) approaches for autonomous detection of HRI task failures based on social cues (from machine learning). We propose a taxonomy of error detection based on self-awareness and social feedback. Finally, we provide recommendations for HRI researchers and practitioners interested in developing robots that detect task errors using human social cues. This article is intended for interdisciplinary HRI researchers and practitioners, where the third theme of our analysis provides more technical details aiming toward the practical implementation of these systems.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2024

Student Reflections on Self-Initiated GenAI Use in HCI Education

This study explores students' self-initiated use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in an interactive systems design class. Through 12 group interviews, students revealed the dual nature of GenAI in (1) stimulating creativity and (2) speeding up design iterations, alongside concerns over its potential to cause shallow learning and reliance. GenAI's benefits were pronounced in the execution phase of design, aiding rapid prototyping and ideation, while its use in initial insight generation posed risks to depth and reflective practice. This reflection highlights the complex role of GenAI in Human-Computer Interaction education, emphasizing the need for balanced integration to leverage its advantages without compromising fundamental learning outcomes.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

A Study on Domain Generalization for Failure Detection through Human Reactions in HRI

Machine learning models are commonly tested in-distribution (same dataset); performance almost always drops in out-of-distribution settings. For HRI research, the goal is often to develop generalized models. This makes domain generalization - retaining performance in different settings - a critical issue. In this study, we present a concise analysis of domain generalization in failure detection models trained on human facial expressions. Using two distinct datasets of humans reacting to videos where error occurs, one from a controlled lab setting and another collected online, we trained deep learning models on each dataset. When testing these models on the alternate dataset, we observed a significant performance drop. We reflect on the causes for the observed model behavior and leave recommendations. This work emphasizes the need for HRI research focusing on improving model robustness and real-life applicability.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

What Predicts Interpersonal Affect? Preliminary Analyses from Retrospective Evaluations

While the field of affective computing has contributed to greatly improving the seamlessness of human-robot interactions, the focus has primarily been on the emotional processing of the self, rather than the perception of the other. To address this gap, in a user study with 30 participant dyads, we collected the users' retrospective ratings of the interpersonal perception of the other interactant, after a short interaction. We made use of CORAE, a novel web-based open-source tool for COntinuous Retrospective Affect Evaluation. In this work, we analyze how these interpersonal ratings correlate with different aspects of the interaction, namely personality traits, participation balance, and sentiment analysis. Notably, we discovered that conversational imbalance has a significant effect on the retrospective ratings, among other findings. By employing these analyses and methodologies, we lay the groundwork for enhanced human-robot interactions, wherein affect is understood as a highly dynamic and context-dependent outcome of interaction history.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2023

A Systematic Review on Reproducibility in Child-Robot Interaction

Research reproducibility - i.e., rerunning analyses on original data to replicate the results - is paramount for guaranteeing scientific validity. However, reproducibility is often very challenging, especially in research fields where multi-disciplinary teams are involved, such as child-robot interaction (CRI). This paper presents a systematic review of the last three years (2020-2022) of research in CRI under the lens of reproducibility, by analysing the field for transparency in reporting. Across a total of 325 studies, we found deficiencies in reporting demographics (e.g. age of participants), study design and implementation (e.g. length of interactions), and open data (e.g. maintaining an active code repository). From this analysis, we distill a set of guidelines and provide a checklist to systematically report CRI studies to help and guide research to improve reproducibility in CRI and beyond.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2023

"How Did They Come Across?" Lessons Learned from Continuous Affective Ratings

Social distance, or perception of the other, is recognized as a dynamic dimension of an interaction, but yet to be widely explored or understood. Through CORAE, a novel web-based open-source tool for COntinuous Retrospective Affect Evaluation, we collected retrospective ratings of interpersonal perceptions between 12 participant dyads. In this work, we explore how different aspects of these interactions reflect on the ratings collected, through a discourse analysis of individual and social behavior of the interactants. We found that different events observed in the ratings can be mapped to complex interaction phenomena, shedding light on relevant interaction features that may play a role in interpersonal understanding and grounding. This paves the way for better, more seamless human-robot interactions, where affect is interpreted as highly dynamic and contingent on interaction history.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

What Could a Social Mediator Robot Do? Lessons from Real-World Mediation Scenarios

The use of social robots as instruments for social mediation has been gaining traction in the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). So far, the design of such robots and their behaviors is often driven by technological platforms and experimental setups in controlled laboratory environments. To address complex social relationships in the real world, it is crucial to consider the actual needs and consequences of the situations found therein. This includes understanding when a mediator is necessary, what specific role such a robot could play, and how it moderates human social dynamics. In this paper, we discuss six relevant roles for robotic mediators that we identified by investigating a collection of videos showing realistic group situations. We further discuss mediation behaviors and target measures to evaluate the success of such interventions. We hope that our findings can inspire future research on robot-assisted social mediation by highlighting a wider set of mediation applications than those found in prior studies. Specifically, we aim to inform the categorization and selection of interaction scenarios that reflect real situations, where a mediation robot can have a positive and meaningful impact on group dynamics.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

CORAE: A Tool for Intuitive and Continuous Retrospective Evaluation of Interactions

This paper introduces CORAE, a novel web-based open-source tool for COntinuous Retrospective Affect Evaluation, designed to capture continuous affect data about interpersonal perceptions in dyadic interactions. Grounded in behavioral ecology perspectives of emotion, this approach replaces valence as the relevant rating dimension with approach and withdrawal, reflecting the degree to which behavior is perceived as increasing or decreasing social distance. We conducted a study to experimentally validate the efficacy of our platform with 24 participants. The tool's effectiveness was tested in the context of dyadic negotiation, revealing insights about how interpersonal dynamics evolve over time. We find that the continuous affect rating method is consistent with individuals' perception of the overall interaction. This paper contributes to the growing body of research on affective computing and offers a valuable tool for researchers interested in investigating the temporal dynamics of affect and emotion in social interactions.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2023

The Bystander Affect Detection (BAD) Dataset for Failure Detection in HRI

For a robot to repair its own error, it must first know it has made a mistake. One way that people detect errors is from the implicit reactions from bystanders -- their confusion, smirks, or giggles clue us in that something unexpected occurred. To enable robots to detect and act on bystander responses to task failures, we developed a novel method to elicit bystander responses to human and robot errors. Using 46 different stimulus videos featuring a variety of human and machine task failures, we collected a total of 2452 webcam videos of human reactions from 54 participants. To test the viability of the collected data, we used the bystander reaction dataset as input to a deep-learning model, BADNet, to predict failure occurrence. We tested different data labeling methods and learned how they affect model performance, achieving precisions above 90%. We discuss strategies to model bystander reactions and predict failure and how this approach can be used in real-world robotic deployments to detect errors and improve robot performance. As part of this work, we also contribute with the "Bystander Affect Detection" (BAD) dataset of bystander reactions, supporting the development of better prediction models.

cs.RO↗