The strangest non-strange meson is not so strange after all
The broad non-strange meson $f_0$(500) is considered to be a non-Breit-Wigner resonance. It is generally assumed that if a resonance is broad it can hardly be described by a Breit-Wigner form. We show here that is not true neither for the broad Z boson, nor for the much narrower $Δ(1232)$, and explain why the $f_0$(500) fits with them perfectly. Key differences between them boil down to a single parameter: the angle at which we see the resonance pole from the threshold, which explains the background, the residue phase, and the difference between the pole and Breit-Wigner parameters.
hep-ph↗