SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Mario Piazza

Publications and source records attributed to Mario Piazza.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A Kruskal Decision Procedure for Intuitionistic Modal Logic IK4

We prove decidability of Simpson's intuitionistic modal logic IK$ by working directly with cut-free nested proofs. Once the end formula is fixed, only finitely many combinations of input and output formulae can occur at a node, although the modal tree itself remains unbounded. We order these nested sequents by rooted homeomorphic embedding: weakening may add input formulae, while transitivity allows a modal edge to be stretched into a non-empty path. Kruskal's theorem makes rooted homeomorphic embedding a well-quasi-order, but does not by itself make backward application of the rules effective: an inference may still occur inside an arbitrarily large context. The finite-support lemma shows that a minimal predecessor need retain only the positions used by the inference, the images of the chosen basis elements, and the branch points joining them. Together with an effective enumeration of bounded rule instances, this bound makes the minimal predecessors computable. Backward closure from the initial sequents gives an increasing sequence of finitely based upward-closed sets. The sequence eventually stabilises, and its stable value is the set of provable nested sequents. At that point, finitely many cut-free proofs suffice: every other provable nested sequent is obtained from one of them by weakening along an embedding. Their maximum height gives a uniform proof-height bound.

cs.LO

Refutation calculi for lattice-based logics: from display to tableaux

Refutation calculi are formal systems developed to derive the invalid formulas of a given logic. While the notion of refutation calculi has played a key role in the development of tableaux calculi, a refutation approach to display calculi has not yet been attempted. In this paper, we introduce refutation display calculi for basic LE-logics, i.e., those logics canonically associated with basic normal lattice expansions of any signature. In particular, we prove soundness and completeness via proof-analysis results on derivable sequents. Finally, we obtain terminating tableaux calculi from these refutation display calculi.

math.LO

A logic for default deontic reasoning

In many real-life settings, agents must navigate dynamic environments while reasoning under incomplete information and acting on a corpus of unstable, context-dependent, and often conflicting norms. We introduce a general, non-modal, proof-theoretic framework for deontic reasoning grounded in default logic. Its central feature is the notion of controlled sequent - a sequent annotated with sets of formulas (control sets) that prescribe what should or should not be entailed by the formulas in the antecedent. When combined with distinct extra-logical rules representing defaults and norms, these control sets record the conditions and constraints governing their applicability, thereby enabling local soundness checks for derived sequents. We prove that controlled sequent calculi satisfies admissibility of contraction and non-analytic cuts, and we establish their strong completeness with respect to credulous consequence in default theories and normative systems. Finally, we illustrate in depth how controlled sequent calculi provide a flexible and expressive basis for resolving deontic conflicts and capturing dynamic deontic notions via appropriate extra-logical rules.

cs.LO

Non-contractive logics, Paradoxes, and Multiplicative Quantifiers

The paper investigates from a proof-theoretic perspective various non-contractive logical systems circumventing logical and semantic paradoxes. Until recently, such systems only displayed additive quantifiers (Gri\v{s}in, Cantini). Systems with multiplicative quantifers have also been proposed in the 2010s (Zardini), but they turned out to be inconsistent with the naive rules for truth or comprehension. We start by presenting a first-order system for disquotational truth with additive quantifiers and we compare it with Gri\v{s}in set theory. We then analyze the reasons behind the inconsistency phenomenon affecting multiplicative quantifers: after interpreting the exponentials in affine logic as vacuous quantifiers, we show how such a logic can be simulated within a truth-free fragment of a system with multiplicative quantifiers. Finally, we prove that the logic of these multiplicative quantifiers (but without disquotational truth) is consistent, by showing that an infinitary version of the cut rule can be eliminated. This paves the way to a syntactic approach to the proof theory of infinitary logic with infinite sequents.

math.LO

Elementary Complexity and von Neumann Algebras

In this paper, we show how a construction of an implicit complexity model can be implemented using concepts coming from the core of von Neumann algebras. Namely, our aim is to gain an understanding of classical computation in terms of the hyperfinite $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor, starting from the class of Kalmar recursive functions. More methodologically, we address the problem of finding the right perspective from which to view the new relation between computation and combinatorial aspects in operator algebras. The rich structure of discrete invariants may provide a mathematical setting able to shed light on some basic combinatorial phenomena that are at the basis of our understanding of complexity.

cs.CC