arXiv subjects

Marisa Ponti

Publications and source records attributed to Marisa Ponti.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Technological Excellence Requires Human and Social Context

Breakthrough technologies increasingly shape social institutions, economic systems, and political futures. Yet models of research excellence associated with such technologies often prioritize technical performance, scalability, and short-term innovation metrics while treating ethical, social, and cultural dimensions as secondary considerations. This perspective article argues that such separation is no longer tenable. We propose a broader understanding of excellence that combines technical rigor with ethical robustness, social intelligibility, and long-term relevance. The rapid emergence of generative and agentic artificial intelligence further underscores this argument. As technological systems increasingly operate through language, interpretation, and normative alignment, expertise traditionally cultivated in the humanities and social sciences becomes integral to the design, governance, and responsible deployment of such systems. Drawing on historical examples and contemporary research practices, this article examines five interconnected domains where the humanities and social sciences, treated as integrated dimensions of research practice, can strengthen technological development: (1) ethical, legal, and social integration in agenda-setting and research design; (2) plural and reflexive foresight practices that shape technological futures; (3) graduate education as a leverage point for cross-disciplinary literacy; (4) visualization and communication as epistemic and civic practices; and (5) institutional frameworks that move beyond rigid distinctions between basic and applied research. Across these dimensions, we propose practical strategies for embedding interdisciplinary collaboration structurally rather than symbolically.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2025

Exploring the Potential of Citiverses for Regulatory Learning

Citiverses hold the potential to support regulatory learning by offering immersive, virtual environments for experimenting with policy scenarios and technologies. This paper proposes a science-for-policy agenda to explore the potential of citiverses as experimentation spaces for regulatory learning, grounded in a consultation with a high-level panel of experts, including policymakers from the European Commission, national government science advisers and leading researchers in digital regulation and virtual worlds. It identifies key research areas, including scalability, real-time feedback, complexity modelling, cross-border collaboration, risk reduction, citizen participation, ethical considerations and the integration of emerging technologies. In addition, the paper analyses a set of experimental topics, spanning transportation, urban planning and the environment/climate crisis, that could be tested in citiverse platforms to advance regulatory learning in these areas. The proposed work is designed to inform future research for policy and emphasizes a responsible approach to developing and using citiverses. It prioritizes careful consideration of the ethical, economic, ecological and social dimensions of different regulations. The paper also explores essential preliminary steps necessary for integrating citiverses into the broader ecosystems of experimentation spaces, including test beds, living labs and regulatory sandboxes

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

When fairness is an abstraction: Equity and AI in Swedish compulsory education

Artificial intelligence experts often question whether AI is fair. They view fairness as a property of AI systems rather than of sociopolitical and economic systems. This paper emphasizes the need to be fair in the social, political, and economic contexts within which an educational system operates and uses AI. Taking Swedish decentralized compulsory education as the context, this paper examines whether and how the use of AI envisaged by national authorities and edtech companies exacerbates unfairness. A qualitative content analysis of selected Swedish policy documents and edtech reports was conducted using the concept of relevant social groups to understand how different groups view the risks and benefits of AI for fairness. Three groups that view efficiency as a key value of AI are identified, and interpreted as economical, pedagogical and accessibility-related. By separating fairness from social justice, this paper challenges the notion of fairness as the formal equality of opportunities.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2022

AI and Citizen Science for Serendipity

It has been argued that introducing AI to creative practices destroys spontaneity, intuition and serendipity. However, the design of systems that leverage complex interactions between citizen scientists (members of the public engaged in research tasks) and computational AI methods have the potential to facilitate creative exploration and chance encounters. Drawing from theories and literature about serendipity and computation, this article points to three interrelated aspects that support the emergence of serendipity in hybrid citizen science systems: the task environment; the characteristics of citizen scientists; and anomalies and errors.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2022

Who will stay? Using Deep Learning to predict engagement of citizen scientists

Citizen science and machine learning should be considered for monitoring the coastal and ocean environment due to the scale of threats posed by climate change and the limited resources to fill knowledge gaps. Using data from the annotation activity of citizen scientists in a Swedish marine project, we constructed Deep Neural Network models to predict forthcoming engagement. We tested the models to identify patterns in annotation engagement. Based on the results, it is possible to predict whether an annotator will remain active in future sessions. Depending on the goals of individual citizen science projects, it may also be necessary to identify either those volunteers who will leave or those who will continue annotating. This can be predicted by varying the threshold for the prediction. The engagement metrics used to construct the models are based on time and activity and can be used to infer latent characteristics of volunteers and predict their task interest based on their activity patterns. They can estimate if volunteers can accomplish a given number of tasks in a certain amount of time, identify early on who is likely to become a top contributor or identify who is likely to quit and provide them with targeted interventions. The novelty of our predictive models lies in the use of Deep Neural Networks and the sequence of volunteer annotations. A limitation of our models is that they do not use embeddings constructed from user profiles as input data, as many recommender systems do. We expect that including user profiles would improve prediction performance.

cs.LG↗