arXiv subjects

Mark Robert Baker

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Robert Baker.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Noether's theorems for first and second order field theories in flat spacetimes

Technical derivations of the Noether identity (that is, showing and explaining all steps using methods of the calculus of variations), as well as of Noether's first and second theorems, are typically presented in explicit detail in the mathematics literature for scalar functions with first order derivatives in the action. This presentation has drawbacks for physicists wishing to learn these techniques to apply to physical field theories that have higher rank tensor fields (potentials) or higher orders of derivatives in the action. Motivated by this, and heavily influenced by the calculus of variations presentation of Gelfand and Fomin, we detail complete derivations of the Noether identity and Noether's theorems for first and second order field theories with tensor fields of arbitrary rank in flat (e.g., Minkowski) spacetimes, showing all steps explicitly. We then give some physical examples of how to apply the first and second theorems to field theories in physics, and detail the origin of conventional spacetime symmetries from the Killing and conformal Killing equations. We conclude by briefly reviewing the many areas of physics where the theorems have been discussed and applied.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2026

The general set of Noetherian energy-momentum tensors in linearized gravity: mathematical framework

Energy-momentum tensors are foundational objects which are uniquely defined in standard physical field theories such as electrodynamics and Yang-Mills theory. In general relativity, and in particular linearized gravity where symmetries required for an energy-momentum tensor derived from Noether's first theorem are well defined, there exists a long standing non-uniqueness problem; numerous distinct energy-momentum expressions exist in the literature, and there is not consensus which, if any, is the unique expressions for the theory. Recently, the viability of the superpotential `improvement' method was shown to be insufficient for addressing the non-uniqueness problem of energy-momentum tensors in linearized gravity. In the present article, the mathematical framework for the general set of Noetherian energy-momentum tensors in linearized gravity is derived using Noether's first theorem, which consists of all possible energy-momentum tensors from the Noether current which yield the linearized Einstein field equations in the corresponding Euler-Lagrange equation of the Noether identity without introducing any `improvement' terms. This result has several advantages in addition to not requiring `improvements', such as the ability to impact the Lagrangian proportional piece of the energy-momentum tensor. Numerous common published gravitational energy-momentum expressions are then compared to these general results to assess which can be classified as Noetherian, and which cannot. Standard physical criteria such as symmetry and tracelessness are then used to prove that it is possible to directly obtain an energy-momentum tensor which is simultaneously symmetric and traceless from the Noether current; such an expression is derived from the general results. Consequences of these results and their relation to the aforementioned non-uniqueness problem are discussed.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2024

GR as a classical spin-2 theory?

The self-interaction spin-2 approach to general relativity (GR) has been extremely influential in the particle physics community. Leaving no doubt regarding its heuristic value, we argue that a view of the metric field of GR as nothing but a stand-in for a self-coupling field in flat spacetime runs into a dilemma: either the view is physically incomplete in so far as it requires recourse to GR after all, or it leads to an absurd multiplication of alternative viewpoints on GR rendering any understanding of the metric field as nothing but a spin-2 field in flat spacetime unjustified.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2021

Noether's first theorem and the energy-momentum tensor ambiguity problem

Noether's theorems are widely praised as some of the most beautiful and useful results in physics. However, if one reads the majority of standard texts and literature on the application of Noether's first theorem to field theory, one immediately finds that the ``canonical Noether energy-momentum tensor" derived from the 4-parameter translation of the Poincaré group does not correspond to what's widely accepted as the ``physical'' energy-momentum tensor for central theories such as electrodynamics. This gives the impression that Noether's first theorem is in some sense not working. In recognition of this issue, common practice is to ``improve" the canonical Noether energy-momentum tensor by adding suitable ad-hoc ``improvement" terms that will convert the canonical expression into the desired result. On the other hand, a less common but distinct method developed by Bessel-Hagen considers gauge symmetries as well as coordinate symmetries when applying Noether's first theorem; this allows one to uniquely derive the accepted physical energy-momentum tensor without the need for any ad-hoc improvement terms in theories with exactly gauge invariant actions. $\dots$ Using the converse of Noether's first theorem, we show that the Bessel-Hagen type transformations are uniquely selected in the case of electrodynamics, which powerfully dissolves the methodological ambiguity at hand. We then go on to consider how this line of argument applies to a variety of other cases, including in particular the challenge of defining an energy-momentum tensor for the gravitational field in linearized gravity. Finally, we put the search for proper Noether energy-momentum tensors into context with recent claims that Noether's theorem and its converse make statements on equivalence classes of symmetries and conservation laws$\dots$

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2021

Canonical Noether and the energy-momentum non-uniqueness problem in linearized gravity

Recent research has highlighted the non-uniqueness problem of energy-momentum tensors in linearized gravity; many different tensors are published in the literature, yet for particular calculations a unique expression is required. It has been shown that (A) none of these spin-2 energy-momentum tensors are gauge invariant and (B) the Noether and Hilbert energy-momentum tensors are not, in general, equivalent; therefore uniqueness criteria is difficult to specify. Conventional wisdom states that the various published energy-momentum tensors for linearized gravity can be derived from the canonical Noether energy-momentum tensor of spin-2 Fierz-Pauli theory by adding ad-hoc 'improvement' terms (the divergence of a superpotential and terms proportional to the equations of motion), that these superpotentials are in some way unique or physically significant, and that this implies some meaningful connection to the Noether procedure. To explore this question of uniqueness, we consider the most general possible energy-momentum tensor for linearized gravity with free coefficients using the Fock method. We express this most general energy-momentum tensor as the canonical Noether tensor, supplemented by the divergence of a general superpotential plus all possible terms proportional to the equations of motion. We then derive systems of equations which we solve in order to prove several key results for spin-2 Fierz-Pauli theory, most notably that there are infinitely many conserved energy-momentum tensors derivable from the 'improvement' method, and there are infinitely many conserved symmetric energy-momentum tensors that follow from specifying the Belinfante superpotential alone. $\dots$ since there are infinitely many energy-momentum tensors of this form, no meaningful or unique connection to Noether's first theorem can be claimed by application of the canonical Noether 'improvement' method.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2021

A connection between linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity and classical electrodynamics II: Complete dual formulation

In a recent publication a procedure was developed which can be used to derive completely gauge invariant models from general Lagrangian densities with $N$ order of derivatives and $M$ rank of tensor potential. This procedure was then used to show that unique models follow for each order, namely classical electrodynamics for $N = M = 1$ and linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity for $N = M = 2$. In this article, the nature of the connection between these two well explored physical models is further investigated by means of an additional common property; a complete dual formulation. First we give a review of Gauss-Bonnet gravity and the dual formulation of classical electrodynamics. The dual formulation of linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity is then developed. It is shown that the dual formulation of linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity is analogous to the homogenous half of Maxwell's theory; both have equations of motion corresponding to the (second) Bianchi identity, built from the dual form of their respective field strength tensors. In order to have a dually symmetric counterpart analogous to the non-homogenous half of Maxwell's theory, the first invariant derived from the procedure in $N = M = 2$ can be introduced. The complete gauge invariance of a model with respect to Noether's first theorem, and not just the equation of motion, is a necessary condition for this dual formulation. We show that this result can be generalized to the higher spin gauge theories, where the spin-$n$ curvature tensors for all $N = M = n$ are the field strength tensors for each $n$. These completely gauge invariant models correspond to the Maxwell-like higher spin gauge theories whose equations of motion have been well explored in the literature.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2020

Curvature tensors of higher-spin gauge theories derived from general Lagrangian densities

Curvature tensors of higher-spin gauge theories have been known for some time. In the past, they were postulated using a generalization of the symmetry properties of the Riemann tensor (curl on each index of a totally symmetric rank-$n$ field for each spin-$n$). For this reason they are sometimes referred to as the generalized 'Riemann' tensors. In this article, a method for deriving these curvature tensors from first principles is presented; the derivation is completed without any a priori knowledge of the existence of the Riemann tensors or the curvature tensors of higher-spin gauge theories. To perform this derivation, a recently developed procedure for deriving exactly gauge invariant Lagrangian densities from quadratic combinations of $N$ order of derivatives and $M$ rank of tensor potential is applied to the $N = M = n$ case under the spin-$n$ gauge transformations. This procedure uniquely yields the Lagrangian for classical electrodynamics in the $N = M = 1$ case and the Lagrangian for higher derivative gravity (`Riemann' and `Ricci' squared terms) in the $N = M = 2$ case. It is proven here by direct calculation for the $N = M = 3$ case that the unique solution to this procedure is the spin-3 curvature tensor and its contractions. The spin-4 curvature tensor is also uniquely derived for the $N = M = 4$ case. In other words, it is proven here that, for the most general linear combination of scalars built from $N$ derivatives and $M$ rank of tensor potential, up to $N=M=4$, there exists a unique solution to the resulting system of linear equations as the contracted spin-$n$ curvature tensors. Conjectures regarding the solutions to the higher spin-$n$ $N = M = n$ are discussed.

hep-th↗

arXiv2020

Noether and Hilbert (metric) energy-momentum tensors are not, in general, equivalent

Multiple methods for deriving the energy-momentum tensor for a physical theory exist in the literature. The most common methods are to use Noether's first theorem with the 4-parameter Poincaré translation, or to write the action in a curved spacetime and perform variation with respect to the metric tensor, then return to a Minkowski spacetime. These are referred to as the Noether and Hilbert (metric/ curved space/ variational) energy-momentum tensors, respectively. In electrodynamics and other simple models, the Noether and Hilbert methods yield the same result. Due to this fact, it is often asserted that these methods are generally equivalent for any theory considered, and that this gives physicists a freedom in using either method to derive an energy-momentum tensor depending on the problem at hand. $\dots$ For spin-2, the ideal candidate to check this equivalence for a more complicated model, there exist many energy-momentum tensors in the literature, none of which are gauge invariant, so it is not clear which expression one hopes to obtain from the Noether and Hilbert approaches unlike in the case of e.g. electrodynamics. It has been shown, however, that the linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity model (second order derivatives, second rank tensor potential) has an energy-momentum tensor that is unique, gauge invariant, symmetric, conserved, and trace-free when derived from Noether's first theorem (all the same properties of the physical energy-momentum tensor of electrodynamics). This makes it the ideal candidate to check if the Noether and Hilbert methods coincide for a more complicated model. It is proven here using this model as a counterexample, by direct calculation, that the Noether and Hilbert energy-momentum tensors are not, in general, equivalent.

math-ph↗

arXiv2018

A connection between linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity and classical electrodynamics

A connection between linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity and classical electrodynamics is found by developing a procedure which can be used to derive completely gauge invariant models. The procedure involves building the most general Lagrangian for a particular order of derivatives ($N$) and rank of tensor potential ($M$), then solving such that the model is completely gauge invariant (the Lagrangian density, equation of motion and energy-momentum tensor are all gauge invariant). In the case of $N = 1$ order of derivatives and $M = 1$ rank of tensor potential, electrodynamics is uniquely derived from the procedure. In the case of $N = 2$ order of derivatives and $M = 2$ rank of symmetric tensor potential, linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity is uniquely derived from the procedure. The natural outcome of the models for classical electrodynamics and linearized Gauss-Bonnet gravity from a common set of rules provides an interesting connection between two well explored physical models.

gr-qc↗

arXiv2016

On the analytical formulation of classical electromagnetic fields

Three objections to the canonical analytical treatment of covariant electromagnetic theory are presented: (i) only half of Maxwell's equations are present upon variation of the fundamental Lagrangian; (ii) the trace of the canonical energy-momentum tensor is not equivalent to the trace of the observed energy-momentum tensor; (iii) the Belinfante symmetrization procedure exists separate from the analytical approach in order to obtain the known observed result. It is shown that the analytical construction from Noether's theorem is based on manipulations that were developed to obtain the compact forms of the theory presented by Minkowski and Einstein; presentations which were developed before the existence of Noether's theorem. By reformulating the fundamental Lagrangian, all of the objections are simultaneously relieved. Variation of the proposed Lagrangian yields the complete set of Maxwell's equations in the Euler-Lagrange equation of motion, and the observed energy-momentum tensor directly follows from Noether's theorem. Previously unavailable symmetries and identities that follow naturally from this procedure are also discussed.

physics.class-ph↗