arXiv subjects

Markus Krötzsch

Publications and source records attributed to Markus Krötzsch.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Recovering Explanations from Transformed Rule-Based Ontologies

Datalog rules are often used to define ontologies over Knowledge Graphs. Rule reasoners routinely optimise such ontologies by rewriting their rules into a form that can be evaluated more efficiently. These transformations preserve the entailed facts, but not the structure of the underlying derivations. A proof tree under the rewritten rules explains why a fact holds, but does not readily yield an explanation in terms of the original rules. We study the problem of constructing, from a proof of entailment under the rewritten rules, a proof under the original ones: we establish its computational complexity and identify two practically relevant languages for specifying proof transformations.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Stratified Negation in RDF Rules: A Correct Approach (Extended Version)

Combining RDF rule languages, such as N3 or SHACL Rules, with default negation is challenging. Existing methods to stratify negation often fail for RDF rules, since individual triples do not carry enough information to meaningfully restrict potential dependencies. Blank nodes in rule heads further complicate the matter, since the order of rule applications may determine whether new values are created, which in turn can change the applicability of rules with negation. To solve these open problems, we propose chain stratification as a robust new condition that guarantees a well-behaved semantics for RDF rules with negation, and existential rules in general. Our condition combines an elaborate analysis of potential multistep derivations with a mechanism for using integrity constraints to discard impossible cases. Applying rules in any order that respects chain stratification is guaranteed to derive an RDF graph that is unique, lean, and justified under the usual negation-as-failure semantics. To show the practicality, we also provide a prototype implementation.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating a Visual Query Tracer and Builder for Learning Declarative Logic Programming

Nemo Explain Visualizer (nev) is an interactive visual query tracer and builder for Nemo, a powerful Datalog reasoner with extended features. Our tools were developed with and for expert users. However, considering the lack of resources to learn Datalog and similar declarative logic programming languages, we conducted a qualitative user study to assess how our tools might help students. The study, interviewing 14 participants with varying levels of involvement with the content of a university course on knowledge graphs, revealed a very positive assessment of our tools, which strengthens the value of visual explanation tools beyond their intended use.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Rule Rewriting Revisited: A Fresh Look at Static Filtering for Datalog and ASP

Static filtering is a data-independent optimisation method for Datalog, which generalises algebraic query rewriting techniques from relational databases. In spite of its early discovery by Kifer and Lozinskii in 1986, the method has been overlooked in recent research and system development, and special cases are being rediscovered independently. We therefore recall the original approach, using updated terminology and more general filter predicates that capture features of modern systems, and we show how to extend its applicability to answer set programming (ASP). The outcome is strictly more general but also more complex than the classical approach: double exponential in general and single exponential even for predicates of bounded arity. As a solution, we propose tractable approximations of the algorithm that can still yield much improved logic programs in typical cases, e.g., it can improve the performance of rule systems over real-world data in the order of magnitude.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2025

Towards Mass Spectrum Analysis with ASP

We present a new use of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to discover the molecular structure of chemical samples based on the relative abundance of elements and structural fragments, as measured in mass spectrometry. To constrain the exponential search space for this combinatorial problem, we develop canonical representations of molecular structures and an ASP implementation that uses these definitions. We evaluate the correctness of our implementation over a large set of known molecular structures, and we compare its quality and performance to other ASP symmetry-breaking methods and to a commercial tool from analytical chemistry. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Supporting Risk Management for Medical Devices via the Riskman Ontology and Shapes (Preprint)

We propose the Riskman ontology and shapes for representing and analysing information about risk management for medical devices. Risk management is concerned with taking necessary precautions to ensure that a medical device does not cause harms for users or the environment. To date, risk management documentation is submitted to notified bodies (for certification) in the form of semi-structured natural language text. We propose to use terms from the Riskman ontology to provide a formal, logical underpinning for risk management documentation, and to use the included SHACL constraints to check whether the provided data is in accordance with the requirements of the two relevant norms, i.e. ISO 14971 and VDE Spec 90025.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

The Shape of $\mathcal{EL}$ Proofs: A Tale of Three Calculi (Extended Version)

Consequence-based reasoning can be used to construct proofs that explain entailments of description logic (DL) ontologies. In the literature, one can find multiple consequence-based calculi for reasoning in the $\mathcal{EL}$ family of DLs, each of which gives rise to proofs of different shapes. Here, we study three such calculi and the proofs they produce on a benchmark based on the OWL Reasoner Evaluation. The calculi are implemented using a translation into existential rules with stratified negation, which had already been demonstrated to be effective for the calculus of the ELK reasoner. We then use the rule engine NEMO to evaluate the rules and obtain traces of the rule execution. After translating these traces back into DL proofs, we compare them on several metrics that reflect different aspects of their complexity.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Chase Termination Beyond Polynomial Time

The chase is a widely implemented approach to reason with tuple-generating dependencies (tgds), used in data exchange, data integration, and ontology-based query answering. However, it is merely a semi-decision procedure, which may fail to terminate. Many decidable conditions have been proposed for tgds to ensure chase termination, typically by forbidding some kind of "cycle" in the chase process. We propose a new criterion that explicitly allows some such cycles, and yet ensures termination of the standard chase under reasonable conditions. This leads to new decidable fragments of tgds that are not only syntactically more general but also strictly more expressive than the fragments defined by prior acyclicity conditions. Indeed, while known terminating fragments are restricted to PTime data complexity, our conditions yield decidable languages for any k-ExpTime. We further refine our syntactic conditions to obtain fragments of tgds for which an optimised chase procedure decides query entailment in PSpace or k-ExpSpace, respectively.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2023

Nemo: First Glimpse of a New Rule Engine

This system demonstration presents Nemo, a new logic programming engine with a focus on reliability and performance. Nemo is built for data-centric analytic computations, modelled in a fully declarative Datalog dialect. Its scalability for these tasks matches or exceeds that of leading Datalog systems. We demonstrate uses in reasoning with knowledge graphs and ontologies with 10^5 to 10^8 input facts, all on a laptop. Nemo is written in Rust and available as a free and open source tool.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

Efficient Dependency Analysis for Rule-Based Ontologies

Several types of dependencies have been proposed for the static analysis of existential rule ontologies, promising insights about computational properties and possible practical uses of a given set of rules, e.g., in ontology-based query answering. Unfortunately, these dependencies are rarely implemented, so their potential is hardly realised in practice. We focus on two kinds of rule dependencies -- positive reliances and restraints -- and design and implement optimised algorithms for their efficient computation. Experiments on real-world ontologies of up to more than 100,000 rules show the scalability of our approach, which lets us realise several previously proposed applications as practical case studies. In particular, we can analyse to what extent rule-based bottom-up approaches of reasoning can be guaranteed to yield redundancy-free "lean" knowledge graphs (so-called cores) on practical ontologies.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

Deciding Hyperproperties Combined with Functional Specifications

We study satisfiability for HyperLTL with a $\forall^*\exists^*$ quantifier prefix, known to be highly undecidable in general. HyperLTL can express system properties that relate multiple traces (so-called hyperproperties), which are often combined with trace properties that specify functional behavior on single traces. Following this conceptual split, we first define several safety and liveness fragments of $\forall^*\exists^*$ HyperLTL, and characterize the complexity of their (often much easier) satisfiability problem. We then add LTL trace properties as functional specifications. Though (highly) undecidable in many cases, this way of combining "simple" HyperLTL and arbitrary LTL also leads to interesting new decidable fragments. This systematic study of $\forall^*\exists^*$ fragments is complemented by a new (incomplete) algorithm for $\forall\exists^*$-HyperLTL satisfiability.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

Chasing Streams with Existential Rules

We study reasoning with existential rules to perform query answering over streams of data. On static databases, this problem has been widely studied, but its extension to rapidly changing data has not yet been considered. To bridge this gap, we extend LARS, a well-known framework for rule-based stream reasoning, to support existential rules. For that, we show how to translate LARS with existentials into a semantics-preserving set of existential rules. As query answering with such rules is undecidable in general, we describe how to leverage the temporal nature of streams and present suitable notions of acyclicity that ensure decidability.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

Expressivity of Planning with Horn Description Logic Ontologies (Technical Report)

State constraints in AI Planning globally restrict the legal environment states. Standard planning languages make closed-domain and closed-world assumptions. Here we address open-world state constraints formalized by planning over a description logic (DL) ontology. Previously, this combination of DL and planning has been investigated for the light-weight DL DL-Lite. Here we propose a novel compilation scheme into standard PDDL with derived predicates, which applies to more expressive DLs and is based on the rewritability of DL queries into Datalog with stratified negation. We also provide a new rewritability result for the DL Horn-ALCHOIQ, which allows us to apply our compilation scheme to quite expressive ontologies. In contrast, we show that in the slight extension Horn-SROIQ no such compilation is possible unless the weak exponential hierarchy collapses. Finally, we show that our approach can outperform previous work on existing benchmarks for planning with DL ontologies, and is feasible on new benchmarks taking advantage of more expressive ontologies. That is an extended version of a paper accepted at AAAI 22.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

A Sorted Datalog Hammer for Supervisor Verification Conditions Modulo Simple Linear Arithmetic

In a previous paper, we have shown that clause sets belonging to the Horn Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment over simple linear real arithmetic (HBS(SLR)) can be translated into HBS clause sets over a finite set of first-order constants. The translation preserves validity and satisfiability and it is still applicable if we extend our input with positive universally or existentially quantified verification conditions (conjectures). We call this translation a Datalog hammer. The combination of its implementation in SPASS-SPL with the Datalog reasoner VLog establishes an effective way of deciding verification conditions in the Horn fragment. We verify supervisor code for two examples: a lane change assistant in a car and an electronic control unit of a supercharged combustion engine. In this paper, we improve our Datalog hammer in several ways: we generalize it to mixed real-integer arithmetic and finite first-order sorts; we extend the class of acceptable inequalities beyond variable bounds and positively grounded inequalities; and we significantly reduce the size of the hammer output by a soft typing discipline. We call the result the sorted Datalog hammer. It not only allows us to handle more complex supervisor code and to model already considered supervisor code more concisely, but it also improves our performance on real world benchmark examples. Finally, we replace the before file-based interface between SPASS-SPL and VLog by a close coupling resulting in a single executable binary.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Answering Queries with Negation over Existential Rules

Ontology-based query answering with existential rules is well understood and implemented for positive queries, in particular conjunctive queries. The situation changes drastically for queries with negation, where there is no agreed-upon semantics or standard implementation. Stratification, as used for Datalog, is not enough for existential rules, since the latter still admit multiple universal models that can differ on negative queries. We therefore propose universal core models as a basis for a meaningful (non-monotonic) semantics for queries with negation. Since cores are hard to compute, we identify syntactic descriptions of queries that can equivalently be answered over other types of models. This leads to fragments of queries with negation that can safely be evaluated by current chase implementations. We establish new techniques to estimate how the core model differs from other universal models, and we incorporate our findings into a new reasoning approach for existential rules with negation.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Capturing Homomorphism-Closed Decidable Queries with Existential Rules

Existential rules are a very popular ontology-mediated query language for which the chase represents a generic computational approach for query answering. It is straightforward that existential rule queries exhibiting chase termination are decidable and can only recognize properties that are preserved under homomorphisms. In this paper, we show the converse: every decidable query that is closed under homomorphism can be expressed by an existential rule set for which the standard chase universally terminates. Membership in this fragment is not decidable, but we show via a diagonalisation argument that this is unavoidable.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

A Datalog Hammer for Supervisor Verification Conditions Modulo Simple Linear Arithmetic

The Bernays-Schönfinkel first-order logic fragment over simple linear real arithmetic constraints BS(SLR) is known to be decidable. We prove that BS(SLR) clause sets with both universally and existentially quantified verification conditions (conjectures) can be translated into BS(SLR) clause sets over a finite set of first-order constants. For the Horn case, we provide a Datalog hammer preserving validity and satisfiability. A toolchain from the BS(LRA) prover SPASS-SPL to the Datalog reasoner VLog establishes an effective way of deciding verification conditions in the Horn fragment. This is exemplified by the verification of supervisor code for a lane change assistant in a car and of an electronic control unit for a supercharged combustion engine.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Partially Ordered Automata and Piecewise Testability

Partially ordered automata are automata where the transition relation induces a partial order on states. The expressive power of partially ordered automata is closely related to the expressivity of fragments of first-order logic on finite words or, equivalently, to the language classes of the levels of the Straubing-Thérien hierarchy. Several fragments (levels) have been intensively investigated under various names. For instance, the fragment of first-order formulae with a single existential block of quantifiers in prenex normal form is known as piecewise testable languages or $J$-trivial languages. These languages are characterized by confluent partially ordered DFAs or by complete, confluent, and self-loop-deterministic partially ordered NFAs (ptNFAs for short). In this paper, we study the complexity of basic questions for several types of partially ordered automata on finite words; namely, the questions of inclusion, equivalence, and ($k$-)piecewise testability. The lower-bound complexity boils down to the complexity of universality. The universality problem asks whether a system recognizes all words over its alphabet. For ptNFAs, the complexity of universality decreases if the alphabet is fixed, but it is open if the alphabet may grow with the number of states. We show that deciding universality for general ptNFAs is as hard as for general NFAs. Our proof is a novel and nontrivial extension of our recent construction for self-loop-deterministic partially ordered NFAs, a model strictly more expressive than ptNFAs. We provide a comprehensive picture of the complexities of the problems of inclusion, equivalence, and ($k$-)piecewise testability for the considered types of automata.

cs.LO↗