arXiv subjects

Marta Robledo-Moreno

Publications and source records attributed to Marta Robledo-Moreno.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Comparative Study of Domain-adapted VLMs for General Document Visual Question Answering

Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in text-vision tasks, their robustness and transferability to different document domains remains underexplored. In this study, we present a comprehensive evaluation of 8 open-source pretrained VLMs on DocVQA in three different document domains: industrial documents of varying type, infographics, and presentation slides. We systematically assess model performance under zero-shot evaluations, fully supervised finetuning with inter- and intra-dataset evaluations, and few-shot learning evaluations of knowledge transfer between domains. Our findings demonstrate that while large pretrained VLMs possess strong zero-shot baselines for structured layouts, their performance strongly decreases on visually complex layouts of infographics and slides. Although parameter scaling is a dominant factor on performance, supervised finetuning yields higher relative gains in smaller architectures. Furthermore, our cross-domain and few-shot experiments show that visual understanding is the main bottleneck for DocVQA, not a lack of knowledge from the VLMs. Using 50 target domain samples, the models finetuned in DocVQA with datasets of different domains rapidly adapt to the target domain documents, even surpassing their fully supervised counterparts in some cases.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

EERLoss: A Novel Loss Function for Training Deep Biometric Models. A Case Study in Keystroke Dynamics

Deep learning approaches to biometric verification are commonly trained by optimizing indirect objectives, creating a misalignment between the optimization process and the primary evaluation metric, typically the Equal Error Rate (EER). This paper introduces EERLoss: a subdifferentiable, arbitrarily accurate approximation to EER for training deep biometric models. Furthermore, this framework has the potential to be adapted to optimize any specific operating point on the DET curve, enhancing its generalizability. To validate this approach, EERLoss is evaluated on a particularly demanding behavioral biometric modality: keystroke dynamics verification. This task is characterized by its high intra-class and low inter-class variability. Experiments are conducted on the large-scale KVC-onGoing benchmark, incorporating data from over 185,000 subjects across different scenarios. A comprehensive ablation study initially demonstrates the superiority of EERLoss in comparison to existing state-of-the-art loss functions. It also converges substantially faster compared to other losses, reducing the overall training cost. Additionally, a comparison is made between the proposed loss and the KVC-winning architecture by re-training it with EERLoss, demonstrating that the proposed approach significantly outperforms the original SoTA, achieving a relative EER reduction of up to approx. 30\%. This improvement on a challenging, large-scale benchmark validates the effectiveness of EERLoss as a task-aligned training objective specifically suited for high-variance biometric traits.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Exploring Vision-Language Models for Online Signature Verification: A Zero-Shot Capability Study

Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in general visual reasoning, yet their applicability to rigorous biometric tasks remains unexplored. This work presents an exploratory study evaluating the zero-shot performance of state-of-the-art VLMs (GPT-5.2 and Gemini 2.5 Pro) on the Signature Verification Challenge (SVC) benchmark. To enable visual processing, raw kinematic time-series are converted into static images, encoding pressure information into stroke opacity whenever available in the source data. Furthermore, we introduce a scoring protocol that extracts latent token probabilities to compute robust biometric scores. Experimental results reveal a significant performance dichotomy dependent on signal quality and forgery type. In random forgery scenarios, the zero-shot VLM achieves exceptional discrimination, with GPT-5.2 reaching an Equal Error Rate of 0.32% in mobile tasks, outperforming supervised state-of-the-art systems. Conversely, in skilled forgery scenarios, where the task is more challenging because both signatures are almost identical, the results are significantly worse, and a critical "Rationalization Trap" emerges: chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning degrades performance as the model produces kinematic hallucinations to justify forgery artifacts as natural variability.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

AirSignatureDB: Exploring In-Air Signature Biometrics in the Wild and its Privacy Concerns

Behavioral biometrics based on smartphone motion sensors are growing in popularity for authentication purposes. In this study, AirSignatureDB is presented: a new publicly accessible dataset of in-air signatures collected from 108 participants under real-world conditions, using 83 different smartphone models across four sessions. This dataset includes genuine samples and skilled forgeries, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of system robustness against realistic attack scenarios. Traditional and deep learning-based methods for in-air signature verification are benchmarked, while analyzing the influence of sensor modality and enrollment strategies. Beyond verification, a first approach to reconstructing the three-dimensional trajectory of in-air signatures from inertial sensor data alone is introduced. Using on-line handwritten signatures as a reference, we demonstrate that the recovery of accurate trajectories is feasible, challenging the long-held assumption that in-air gestures are inherently traceless. Although this approach enables forensic traceability, it also raises critical questions about the privacy boundaries of behavioral biometrics. Our findings underscore the need for a reevaluation of the privacy assumptions surrounding inertial sensor data, as they can reveal user-specific information that had not previously been considered in the design of in-air signature systems.

cs.HC↗