Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Marthe Bonamy

Publications and source records attributed to Marthe Bonamy.

78 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Recoloring graphs via tree decompositions

Let $k$ be an integer. Two vertex $k$-colorings of a graph are \emph{adjacent} if they differ on exactly one vertex. A graph is \emph{$k$-mixing} if any proper $k$-coloring can be transformed into any other through a sequence of adjacent proper $k$-colorings. Jerrum proved that any graph is $k$-mixing if $k$ is at least the maximum degree plus two. We first improve Jerrum's bound using the grundy number, which is the worst number of colors in a greedy coloring. Any graph is $(tw+2)$-mixing, where $tw$ is the treewidth of the graph (Cereceda 2006). We prove that the shortest sequence between any two $(tw+2)$-colorings is at most quadratic (which is optimal up to a constant factor), a problem left open in Bonamy et al. (2012). We also prove that given any two $(χ(G)+1)$-colorings of a cograph (resp. distance-hereditary graph) $G$, we can find a linear (resp. quadratic) sequence between them. In both cases, the bounds cannot be improved by more than a constant factor for a fixed $χ(G)$. The graph classes are also optimal in some sense: one of the smallest interesting superclass of distance-hereditary graphs corresponds to comparability graphs, for which no such property holds (even when relaxing the constraint on the length of the sequence). As for cographs, they are equivalently the graphs with no induced $P_4$, and there exist $P_5$-free graphs that admit no sequence between two of their $(χ(G)+1)$-colorings. All the proofs are constructivist and lead to polynomial-time recoloring algorithm

cs.DM↗

Brooks' theorem on powers of graphs

We prove that for $k\geq 3$, the bound given by Brooks' theorem on the chromatic number of $k$-th powers of graphs of maximum degree $Δ\geq 3$ can be lowered by 1, even in the case of online list coloring.

cs.DM↗

List coloring the square of sparse graphs with large degree

We consider the problem of coloring the squares of graphs of bounded maximum average degree, that is, the problem of coloring the vertices while ensuring that two vertices that are adjacent or have a common neighbour receive different colors. Borodin et al. proved in 2004 and 2008 that the squares of planar graphs of girth at least seven and sufficiently large maximum degree $Δ$ are list $(Δ+1)$-colorable, while the squares of some planar graphs of girth six and arbitrarily large maximum degree are not. By Euler's Formula, planar graphs of girth at least $6$ are of maximum average degree less than $3$, and planar graphs of girth at least $7$ are of maximum average degree less than $14/5<3$. We strengthen their result and prove that there exists a function $f$ such that the square of any graph with maximum average degree $m<3$ and maximum degree $Δ\geq f(m)$ is list $(Δ+1)$-colorable. This bound of $3$ is optimal in the sense that the above-mentioned planar graphs with girth $6$ have maximum average degree less than $3$ and arbitrarily large maximum degree, while their square cannot be $(Δ+1)$-colored. The same holds for list injective $Δ$-coloring.

cs.DM↗

Planar graphs with maximum degree D at least 8 are (D+1)-edge-choosable

We consider the problem of list edge coloring for planar graphs. Edge coloring is the problem of coloring the edges while ensuring that two edges that are incident receive different colors. A graph is k-edge-choosable if for any assignment of k colors to every edge, there is an edge coloring such that the color of every edge belongs to its color assignment. Vizing conjectured in 1965 that every graph is (D+1)-edge-choosable, where D is the maximum degree. In 1990, Borodin solved the conjecture for planar graphs with maximum degree at least 9, and asked whether the bound could be lowered to 8. We prove here that planar graphs with maximum degree D at least 8 are (D+1)-edge-choosable.

cs.DM↗

Recoloring bounded treewidth graphs

Let $k$ be an integer. Two vertex $k$-colorings of a graph are \emph{adjacent} if they differ on exactly one vertex. A graph is \emph{$k$-mixing} if any proper $k$-coloring can be transformed into any other through a sequence of adjacent proper $k$-colorings. Any graph is $(tw+2)$-mixing, where $tw$ is the treewidth of the graph (Cereceda 2006). We prove that the shortest sequence between any two $(tw+2)$-colorings is at most quadratic, a problem left open in Bonamy et al. (2012). Jerrum proved that any graph is $k$-mixing if $k$ is at least the maximum degree plus two. We improve Jerrum's bound using the grundy number, which is the worst number of colors in a greedy coloring.

cs.DM↗

Graphs with maximum degree D at least 17 and maximum average degree less than 3 are list 2-distance (D+2)-colorable

For graphs of bounded maximum average degree, we consider the problem of 2-distance coloring. This is the problem of coloring the vertices while ensuring that two vertices that are adjacent or have a common neighbor receive different colors. It is already known that planar graphs of girth at least 6 and of maximum degree D are list 2-distance (D+2)-colorable when D>=24 (Borodin and Ivanova (2009)) and 2-distance (D+2)-colorable when D>=18 (Borodin and Ivanova (2009)). We prove here that D>=17 suffices in both cases. More generally, we show that graphs with maximum average degree less than 3 and D>=17 are list 2-distance (D+2)-colorable. The proof can be transposed to list injective (D+1)-coloring.

cs.DM↗