arXiv subjects

Masahiro Kasatani

Publications and source records attributed to Masahiro Kasatani.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2008

The polynomial representation of the double affine Hecke algebra of type $(C^\vee_n, C_n)$ for specialized parameters

In this paper, we study the polynomial representation of the double affine Hecke algebra of type $(C^\vee_n, C_n)$ for specialized parameters. Inductively and combinatorially, we give a linear basis of the representation in terms of linear combinations of non-symmetric Koornwinder polynomials. The basis consists of generalized eigenfunctions with respect to $q$-Dunkl-Cherednik operators $\hat{Y}_i$, and it gives a way to cancel out poles of non-symmetric Koornwinder polynomials. We examine irreducibility and $Y$-semisimplicity of the representation for the specialized parameters. For some cases, we give a characterization of the subrepresentations by vanishing conditions for Laurent polynomials.

math.RT↗

arXiv2005

Subrepresentations in the Polynomial Representation of the Double Affine Hecke Algebra of type $GL_n$ at $t^{k+1}q^{r-1}=1$

We study a Laurent polynomial representation $V$ of the double affine Hecke algebra of type $GL_n$ for specialized parameters $t^{k+1}q^{r-1}=1$. We define a series of subrepresentations of $V$ by using a vanishing condition. For some cases, we give an explicit basis of the subrepresentation in terms of nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials. These results are nonsymmetric versions of \cite{FJMM} and \cite{KMSV}.

math.QA↗

arXiv2004

Zeros of Symmetric Laurent Polynomials of Type $(BC)_n$ and Koornwinder-Macdonald Polynomials Specialized at $t^{k+1}q^{r-1}=1$

A characterization of the space of symmetric Laurent polynomials of type $(BC)_n$ which vanish on a certain set of submanifolds is given by using the Koornwinder-Macdonald polynomials. A similar characterization was given previously for symmetric polynomials of type $A_n$ by using the Macdonald polynomials. We use a new method which exploits the duality relation. The method simplifies a part of the proof in the $A_n$ case.

math.QA↗