Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Massimiliano Tancioni

Publications and source records attributed to Massimiliano Tancioni.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Double Machine Learning for Time Series

We modify the Double Machine Learning estimator to broaden its applicability to macroeconomic time-series settings. A deterministic cross-fitting step, termed Reverse Cross-Fitting, leverages the time-reversibility of stationary series to improve sample utilization and efficiency. We detail and prove the conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically valid. We then demonstrate, through simulations, that its performance remains valid in realistic finite samples and is robust to model misspecification and violations of assumptions, such as heteroskedasticity. In high dimensions, predictive metrics for tuning nuisance learners do not generally minimize bias in the causal score. We propose a calibration rule targeting a "Goldilocks zone", a region of tuning parameters that delivers stable, partialled-out signals and reduced small-sample bias. Finally, we apply our procedure to residualized Local Projections to estimate the dynamic effects of a rise in Tier 1 regulatory capital. The results underscore the usefulness of the methodology for inference in macroeconomic applications.

econ.EM↗

Disentangling the Distributional Effects of Financial Shocks in the Euro Area

We estimate the dynamic distributional effects of financial shocks in the Euro Area using survey-based microdata on personal incomes. We find that positive financial shocks increase inequality, with heterogeneity across different income groups. Much of the response emerges in the tails of the income distribution. By decomposing individual incomes into financial and labor components, we identify two distinct transmission mechanisms: financial income inequality rises, likely due to differences in asset holdings. In contrast, labor income inequality increases through a skill premium channel. We then consider a nonlinear model framework, distinguishing the sign of the shock, allowing us to document the presence of asymmetric effects. While positive shocks lead to income disparities, adverse shocks have the opposite effect. Notably, middle-income groups are only affected following a negative shock, highlighting differential vulnerabilities across the income distribution.

econ.GN↗