arXiv subjects

Matan Ben-Tov

Publications and source records attributed to Matan Ben-Tov.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

TROPT: An Open Framework for Unifying and Advancing Discrete Text Optimization

Discrete text-trigger optimization -- searching for text sequences that, when ingested by a model, steer it toward a specified objective -- underpins model red-teaming (e.g., LLM jailbreaks), as well as auditing and interpretability. However, the current state of discrete optimizers hinders their adoption and progress. First, existing optimizers, when open-sourced at all, are scattered across research codebases tied to specific models, objectives, and problem domains. Second, optimizer variants proliferate, each requiring engineering overhead to use or extend, and remaining hard to compare head-to-head. Together, these raise the bar for adopting optimizers in existing or new domains, and for advancing them via new strategies. We address these gaps with TROPT, the first open-source framework that unifies discrete optimizers' execution and standardizes their development under a single interface. TROPT makes it easy to customize end-to-end optimization recipes by swapping any component -- models, objectives, and optimizers -- extending its reach across domains and new applications. TROPT currently ships with 30+ optimization recipes -- covering applications such as jailbreaking and probing model internals -- built from 15+ optimizers (spanning white-box to black-box access) and 15+ losses, from foundational to state-of-the-art methods. Demonstrating its utility, we leverage TROPT in several studies: (i) controlled, large-scale experiments comparing and enhancing optimization strategies for LLM jailbreaks, revealing potent-yet-underadopted techniques; and (ii) porting optimizers from one domain (e.g., LLM jailbreak) to new domains (e.g., corpus-poisoning embedding model). In all, TROPT significantly lowers the barrier to adopting and advancing discrete text optimization.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Universal Jailbreak Suffixes Are Strong Attention Hijackers

We study suffix-based jailbreaks$\unicode{x2013}$a powerful family of attacks against large language models (LLMs) that optimize adversarial suffixes to circumvent safety alignment. Focusing on the widely used foundational GCG attack, we observe that suffixes vary in efficacy: some are markedly more universal$\unicode{x2013}$generalizing to many unseen harmful instructions$\unicode{x2013}$than others. We first show that a shallow, critical mechanism drives GCG's effectiveness. This mechanism builds on the information flow from the adversarial suffix to the final chat template tokens before generation. Quantifying the dominance of this mechanism during generation, we find GCG irregularly and aggressively hijacks the contextualization process. Crucially, we tie hijacking to the universality phenomenon, with more universal suffixes being stronger hijackers. Subsequently, we show that these insights have practical implications: GCG's universality can be efficiently enhanced (up to $\times$5 in some cases) at no additional computational cost, and can also be surgically mitigated, at least halving the attack's success with minimal utility loss. We release our code and data at http://github.com/matanbt/interp-jailbreak.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

CaFA: Cost-aware, Feasible Attacks With Database Constraints Against Neural Tabular Classifiers

This work presents CaFA, a system for Cost-aware Feasible Attacks for assessing the robustness of neural tabular classifiers against adversarial examples realizable in the problem space, while minimizing adversaries' effort. To this end, CaFA leverages TabPGD$-$an algorithm we set forth to generate adversarial perturbations suitable for tabular data$-$ and incorporates integrity constraints automatically mined by state-of-the-art database methods. After producing adversarial examples in the feature space via TabPGD, CaFA projects them on the mined constraints, leading, in turn, to better attack realizability. We tested CaFA with three datasets and two architectures and found, among others, that the constraints we use are of higher quality (measured via soundness and completeness) than ones employed in prior work. Moreover, CaFA achieves higher feasible success rates$-$i.e., it generates adversarial examples that are often misclassified while satisfying constraints$-$than prior attacks while simultaneously perturbing few features with lower magnitudes, thus saving effort and improving inconspicuousness. We open-source CaFA, hoping it will serve as a generic system enabling machine-learning engineers to assess their models' robustness against realizable attacks, thus advancing deployed models' trustworthiness.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

GASLITEing the Retrieval: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Dense Embedding-based Search

Dense embedding-based text retrieval$\unicode{x2013}$retrieval of relevant passages from corpora via deep learning encodings$\unicode{x2013}$has emerged as a powerful method attaining state-of-the-art search results and popularizing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). Still, like other search methods, embedding-based retrieval may be susceptible to search-engine optimization (SEO) attacks, where adversaries promote malicious content by introducing adversarial passages to corpora. Prior work has shown such SEO is feasible, mostly demonstrating attacks against retrieval-integrated systems (e.g., RAG). Yet, these consider relaxed SEO threat models (e.g., targeting single queries), use baseline attack methods, and provide small-scale retrieval evaluation, thus obscuring our comprehensive understanding of retrievers' worst-case behavior. This work aims to faithfully and thoroughly assess retrievers' robustness, paving a path to uncover factors related to their susceptibility to SEO. To this end, we, first, propose the GASLITE attack for generating adversarial passages, that$\unicode{x2013}$without relying on the corpus content or modifying the model$\unicode{x2013}$carry adversary-chosen information while achieving high retrieval ranking, consistently outperforming prior approaches. Second, using GASLITE, we extensively evaluate retrievers' robustness, testing nine advanced models under varied threat models, while focusing on pertinent adversaries targeting queries on a specific concept (e.g., a public figure). Amongst our findings: retrievers are highly vulnerable to SEO against concept-specific queries, even under negligible poisoning rates (e.g., $\geq$0.0001% of the corpus), while generalizing across different corpora and query distributions; single-query SEO is completely solved by GASLITE; adaptive attacks demonstrate bypassing common defenses; [...]

cs.CR↗