arXiv subjects

Matt Germonprez

Publications and source records attributed to Matt Germonprez.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Accountability in Open Source Software Ecosystems: Workshop Report

Open source software ecosystems are composed of a variety of stakeholders including but not limited to non-profit organizations, volunteer contributors, users, and corporations. The needs and motivations of these stakeholders are often diverse, unknown, and sometimes even conflicting given the engagement and investment of both volunteers and corporate actors. Given this, it is not clear how open source communities identify and engage with their stakeholders, understand their needs, and hold themselves accountable to those needs. We convened 24 expert scholars and practitioners studying and working with open source software communities for an exploratory workshop discussion on these ideas. The workshop titled "Accountability and Open Source Software Ecosystems" was organized on Oct 14-15 on campus in Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. The purpose of this in-person workshop was to initiate conversations that explore important and urgent questions related to the role of accountability in open source software ecosystems, and to inspire an exciting research agenda and meaningful stakeholder engagement ideas for practitioners.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Open Source Software Lifecycle Classification: Developing Wrangling Techniques for Complex Sociotechnical Systems

Open source software is a rapidly evolving center for distributed work, and understanding the characteristics of this work across its different contexts is vital for informing policy, economics, and the design of enabling software. The steep increase in open source projects and corporate participation have transformed a peripheral, cottage industry component of the global technology ecosystem into a large, infinitely complex "technology parts supplier" wired into every corner of contemporary life. The lack of theory and tools for breaking this complexity down into identifiable project types or strategies for understanding them more systematically is incommensurate with current industry, society, and developer needs. This paper reviews previous attempts to classify open source software and other organizational ecosystems, using open source scientific software ecosystems in contrast with those found in corporatized open source software. It then examines the divergent and sometimes conflicting purposes that may exist for classifying open source projects and how these competing interests impede our progress in developing a comprehensive understanding of how open source software projects and companies operate. Finally, we will present an empirical, mixed-methods study demonstrating how to classify open-source projects by their lifecycle position. This is the first step forward, advancing our scientific and practical knowledge of open source software through the lens of dynamic and evolving open source genres. It concludes with examples and a proposed path forward.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Open Source Software Field Research: Spanning Social and Practice Networks for Re-Entering the Field

Sociotechnical research increasingly includes the social sub-networks that emerge from large-scale sociotechnical infrastructure, including the infrastructure for building open source software. This paper addresses these numerous sub-networks as advantageous for researchers. It provides a methodological synthesis focusing on how researchers can best span adjacent social sub-networks during engaged field research. Specifically, we describe practices and artifacts that aid movement from one social subsystem within a more extensive technical infrastructure to another. To surface the importance of spanning sub-networks, we incorporate a discussion of social capital and the role of technical infrastructure in its development for sociotechnical researchers. We then characterize a five-step process for spanning social sub-networks during engaged field research: commitment, context mapping, jargon competence, returning value, and bridging. We then present our experience studying corporate open source software projects and the role of that experience in accelerating our work in open source scientific software research as described through the lens of bridging social capital. Based on our analysis, we offer recommendations for engaging in fieldwork in adjacent social sub-networks that share a technical context and discussion of how the relationship between social and technically acquired social capital is a missing but critical methodological dimension for research on large-scale sociotechnical research.

cs.CY↗