SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Matthew Colbrook

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew Colbrook.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Computation and Verification of Spectra for Non-Hermitian Systems

We establish a connection between quantum mechanics and computation, revealing fundamental limitations for algorithms computing spectra, especially in non-Hermitian settings. Introducing the concept of locally trivial pseudospectra (LTP), we show such assumptions are necessary for spectral computation. LTP adapts dynamically to system energies, enabling spectral analysis across a broad class of challenging non-Hermitian problems. Exploiting this framework, we overcome a longstanding obstacle by computing the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the imaginary cubic oscillator $H_{\mathrm{B}} = p^2 + i x^3$ with error bounds and no spurious modes -- yielding, to our knowledge, the first such error-controlled result. We confirm, for instance, the 100th eigenvalue as $627.6947122484365113526737029011536\ldots$. Here, truncation-induced $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetry breaking causes spurious eigenvalues -- a pitfall our method avoids, highlighting the link between truncation and physics. Finally, we illustrate the approach's generality via spectral computations for a range of physically relevant operators. This letter provides a rigorous framework linking computational theory to quantum mechanics and offers a precise tool for spectral calculations with error bounds.

quant-ph

Noisy PDE Training Requires Bigger PINNs

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are increasingly used to approximate solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs), particularly in high dimensions. In real-world settings, data are often noisy, making it crucial to understand when a predictor can still achieve low empirical risk. Yet, little is known about the conditions under which a PINN can do so effectively. We analyse PINNs applied to the Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) PDE and establish a lower bound on the network size required for the supervised PINN empirical risk to fall below the variance of noisy supervision labels. Specifically, if a predictor achieves empirical risk $O(\eta)$ below $\sigma^2$ (the variance of the supervision data), then necessarily $d_N\log d_N\gtrsim N_s \eta^2$, where $N_s$ is the number of samples and $d_N$ the number of trainable parameters. A similar constraint holds in the fully unsupervised PINN setting when boundary labels are noisy. Thus, simply increasing the number of noisy supervision labels does not offer a ``free lunch'' in reducing empirical risk. We also give empirical studies on the HJB PDE, the Poisson PDE and the the Navier-Stokes PDE set to produce the Taylor-Green solutions. In these experiments we demonstrate that PINNs indeed need to be beyond a threshold model size for them to train to errors below $\sigma^2$. These results provide a quantitative foundation for understanding parameter requirements when training PINNs in the presence of noisy data.

cs.LG

Bridging the Gap between Koopmanism and Response Theory: Using Natural Variability to Predict Forced Response

The fluctuation-dissipation theorem is a cornerstone result in statistical mechanics that can be used to translate the statistics of the free natural variability of a system into information on its forced response to perturbations. By combining this viewpoint on response theory with the key ingredients of Koopmanism, it is possible to deconstruct virtually any response operator into a sum of terms, each associated with a specific mode of natural variability of the system. This dramatically improves the interpretability of the resulting response formulas. We show here on three simple yet mathematically meaningful examples how to use the Extended Dynamical Mode Decomposition (EDMD) algorithm on an individual trajectory of the system to compute with high accuracy correlation functions as well as Green functions associated with acting forcings. This demonstrates the great potential of using Koopman analysis for the key problem of evaluating and testing the sensitivity of a complex system.

cond-mat.stat-mech