arXiv subjects

Matthew Goette

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew Goette.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Motion Artifact-Aware Self-Supervised Representation Learning for 3D Brain MRI Motion Artifact Reduction

Patient motion remains a source of image degradation in brain MRI, leading to signal loss, blurring, and geometric distortion that compromise quantitative analysis. Existing deep learning methods for motion correction typically rely on paired clean-corrupted data or k-space acquisitions, which are rarely available in clinical settings. We propose SSRL-MAR, a motion artifact-aware unpaired representation learning framework for motion artifact reduction that requires neither paired training data nor explicit motion labels. SSRL-MAR employed a three-stage training strategy: (1) contrastive learning on 3D patches to extract motion representations by contrasting clean and synthetically corrupted images, (2) a motion artifact-aware synthesis network to generate motion artifacts from clean scans, and (3) a motion artifact-aware generator to restore clean volumes using the learned degrader for self-supervised supervision. On in-silico dataset, SSRL-MAR achieved PSNR 23.81dB, SSIM 91.55%, and NMSE 0.79%. On in-vivo MR-ART dataset, the pretrained model reduced motion distortion, and unsupervised domain adaptation further improved anatomical fidelity. Against a source-only supervised model trained on the same simulated pairs, SSRL-MAR improved PSNR by up to 2.0 dB on MR-ART after unsupervised domain adaptation, and remained within 0.25-0.47 dB of an oracle supervised model that requires real paired data unavailable in practice. At the milder motion level, volumetric error in structures such as the corpus callosum and ventricular system decreased by more than 50%, confirming improved neuroanatomical consistency. These results indicate that SSRL-MAR provides a robust and scalable image-domain solution for 3D brain MRI motion correction, enabling reliable structural quantification in large-scale neuroimaging studies without requiring prospectively acquired pairs or acquisition-specific calibration.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of AI-driven MRI Motion Artifact Detection and Correction

Background: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methods for detecting and correcting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) motion artifacts, assessing current developments, effectiveness, challenges, and future research directions. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, focusing on deep learning (DL) approaches, particularly generative models, for the detection and correction of MRI motion artifacts. Quantitative data were extracted regarding utilized datasets, DL architectures, and performance metrics. Results: DL, particularly generative models, show promise for reducing motion artifacts and improving image quality; however, limited generalizability, reliance on paired training data, and risk of visual distortions remain key challenges that motivate standardized datasets and reporting. Conclusions: AI-driven methods, particularly DL generative models, show significant potential for improving MRI image quality by effectively addressing motion artifacts. However, critical challenges must be addressed, including the need for comprehensive public datasets, standardized reporting protocols for artifact levels, and more advanced, adaptable DL techniques to reduce reliance on extensive paired datasets. Addressing these aspects could substantially enhance MRI diagnostic accuracy, reduce healthcare costs, and improve patient care outcomes.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2022

MRI-based Material Mass Density and Relative Stopping Power Estimation via Deep Learning for Proton Therapy

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly incorporated into treatment planning, because of its superior soft tissue contrast used for tumor and soft tissue delineation versus computed tomography (CT). However, MRI cannot directly provide mass density or relative stopping power (RSP) maps required for proton radiotherapy dose calculation. To demonstrate the feasibility of MRI-only based mass density and RSP estimation using deep learning (DL) for proton radiotherapy. A DL-based framework was developed to discover underlying voxel-wise correlation between MR images and mass density and RSP. Five tissue substitute phantoms including skin, muscle, adipose, 45% hydroxyapatite (HA), and spongiosa bone were customized for MRI scanning based on material composition information from ICRP reports. Two animal tissue phantoms made of pig brain and liver were prepared for DL training. In the phantom study, two DL models were trained: one containing clinical T1 and T2 MRIs and another incorporating zero echo time (ZTE) MRIs as input. In the patient application study, two DL models were trained: one including T1 and T2 MRIs as input, and one incorporating synthetic dual-energy computed tomography (sDECT) images to provide bone tissue information. In the phantom study, DL model based on T1 and T2 MRI demonstrated higher accuracy mass density and RSP estimation in skin, muscle, adipose, brain, and liver with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of 0.42%, 0.14%, 0.19%, 0.78% and 0.26% for mass density and 0.30%, 0.11%, 0.16%, 0.61% and 0.23% for RSP, respectively. DL model incorporating ZTE MRI improved the accuracy of mass density and RSP estimation in 45% HA and spongiosa bone with MAPE at 0.23% and 0.09% for mass density and 0.19% and 0.07% for RSP, respectively. Results show feasibility of MRI-only based mass density and RSP estimation for proton therapy treatment planning using DL method.

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2022

Multimodal Imaging-based Material Mass Density Estimation for Proton Therapy Using Physics-Constrained Deep Learning

Mapping computed tomography (CT) number to material property dominates the proton range uncertainty. This work aims to develop a physics-constrained deep learning-based multimodal imaging (PDMI) framework to integrate physics, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and advanced dual-energy CT (DECT) to derive accurate patient mass density maps. Seven tissue substitute MRI phantoms were used for PDMI-based material calibration. The training inputs are from MRI and twin-beam dual-energy images acquired at 120 kVp with gold and tin filters. The feasibility investigation included an empirical DECT correlation and four residual networks (ResNet) derived from different training inputs and strategies by the PDMI framework. PRN-MR-DE and RN-MR-DE denote ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using MRI and DECT images. PRN-DE and RN-DE represent ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using DECT-only images. For the tissue surrogate study, PRN-MR-DE, PRN-DE, and RN-MR-DE result in mean mass density errors: -0.72%, 2.62%, -3.58% for adipose; -0.03%, -0.61%, and -0.18% for muscle; -0.58%, -1.36%, and -4.86% for 45% HA bone. The retrospective patient study indicated that PRN-MR-DE predicted the densities of soft tissue and bone within expected intervals based on the literature survey, while PRN-DE generated large density deviations. The proposed PDMI framework can generate accurate mass density maps using MRI and DECT images. The physics-constrained training can further enhance model efficacy, making PRN-MR-DE outperform RN-MR-DE. The patient investigation also shows that the PDMI framework has the potential to improve proton range uncertainty with accurate patient mass density maps.

physics.med-ph↗