arXiv subjects

Matthew Waller

Publications and source records attributed to Matthew Waller.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

MGKDB: An IMAS-aligned multicode gyrokinetic simulation database for reproducible fusion turbulence modeling and data-driven analysis

Expensive fusion simulations are commonly preserved in code-specific formats that limit discovery, comparison, and reuse. We present the Multiscale GyroKinetic DataBase (MGKDB), an open-source software framework and curated archive that converts heterogeneous simulation campaigns into traceable scientific records. Each record links code-native inputs and outputs to provenance and quality metadata, an IMAS-aligned physics representation, and derived diagnostics, preserving model-specific evidence while enabling common-field queries. Production pathways support linear and nonlinear GENE and CGYRO calculations and reduced quasilinear TGLF evaluations. At the September 1, 2026 snapshot, MGKDB contained 1,068,089 records, nearly all of which included a populated gyrokinetics IMAS branch. The software is openly available, while access to the NERSC-hosted production records is managed. Three demonstrations show how these linked representations support scientific reuse. Standardized quantities stored in the Diagnostics branch enable population-scale analysis of archived linear modes; common input coordinates reveal coverage, redundancy, and campaign-driven sampling structure across a multicode collection; and record-level retrieval of native CGYRO inputs drives matched TGLF calculations and produces a traceable dataset for exploratory surrogate modeling. Together, these examples demonstrate how MGKDB supports archive characterization, candidate cross-code and cross-fidelity comparisons, campaign planning, and reproducible data-driven modeling without treating different models as automatically equivalent.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2026

The Fusion Equilibrium Challenge: Inferring Magnetic Geometry Without Magnetic Diagnostics

Next-generation fusion reactor devices such as SPARC, ARC, and CFETR will operate in extreme neutron environments that compromise the magnetic sensors traditionally used to reconstruct plasma equilibria. However, reliable knowledge of the plasma equilibrium--including magnetic flux surfaces, safety factor profiles, and shaping parameters--is indispensable for real-time control, disruption avoidance, and physics interpretation. The Fusion Equilibrium Challenge invites the NeurIPS community to confront a deceptively simple but scientifically rigorous inverse problem: reconstruct the two-dimensional poloidal flux function psi(R,Z) and a suite of scalar equilibrium parameters from non-magnetic diagnostics alone, namely external poloidal-field coil currents and Thomson-scattering electron temperature/density profiles. The challenge provides the first open-access, harmonized multi-machine benchmark for fusion, releasing a curated dataset of 9,113 DIII-D shots and 2,416 MAST shots--filtered for Thomson-diagnostic availability, feature completeness, and EFIT-reconstruction quality. Each shot is packaged into a standard Parquet file containing approximately 260 (DIII-D) / approximately 80 (MAST) EFIT flux maps and rich high-rate diagnostics. Two complementary awards reward intra-machine reconstruction fidelity (S_model) on DIII-D and zero-shot cross-machine generalization (G_ratio) to the topologically distinct MAST spherical tokamak. We argue that the challenge functions as a benchmark for reactor-ready equilibrium inference and as a probe of how far machine learning can be pushed toward truly machine-agnostic plasma state estimation.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2025

The Data Fusion Labeler (dFL): Challenges and Solutions to Data Harmonization, Labeling, and Provenance in Fusion Energy

Fusion energy research increasingly depends on the ability to integrate heterogeneous, multimodal datasets from high-resolution diagnostics, control systems, and multiscale simulations. The sheer volume and complexity of these datasets demand the development of new tools capable of systematically harmonizing and extracting knowledge across diverse modalities. The Data Fusion Labeler (dFL) is introduced as a unified workflow instrument that performs uncertainty-aware data harmonization, schema-compliant data fusion, and provenance-rich manual and automated labeling at scale. By embedding alignment, normalization, and labeling within a reproducible, operator-order-aware framework, dFL reduces time-to-analysis by greater than 50X (e.g., enabling >200 shots/hour to be consistently labeled rather than a handful per day), enhances label (and subsequently training) quality, and enables cross-device comparability. Case studies from DIII-D demonstrate its application to automated ELM detection and confinement regime classification, illustrating its potential as a core component of data-driven discovery, model validation, and real-time control in future burning plasma devices.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2025

Quantifying Resolution Limits in Pedestal Profile Measurements with Gaussian Process Regression

Edge transport barriers (ETBs) in magnetically confined fusion plasmas, commonly known as pedestals, play a crucial role in achieving high confinement plasmas. However, their defining characteristic, a steep rise in plasma pressure over short length scales, makes them challenging to diagnose experimentally. In this work, we use Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to develop first-principles metrics for quantifying the spatiotemporal resolution limits of inferring differentiable profiles of temperature, pressure, or other quantities from experimental measurements. Although we focus on pedestals, the methods are fully general and can be applied to any setting involving the inference of profiles from discrete measurements. First, we establish a correspondence between GPR and low-pass filtering, giving an explicit expression for the effective `cutoff frequency' associated with smoothing incurred by GPR. Second, we introduce a novel information-theoretic metric, \(N_{eff}\), which measures the effective number of data points contributing to the inferred value of a profile or its derivative. These metrics enable a quantitative assessment of the trade-off between `over-fitting' and `over-regularization', providing both practitioners and consumers of GPR with a systematic way to evaluate the credibility of inferred profiles. We apply these tools to develop practical advice for using GPR in both time-independent and time-dependent settings, and demonstrate their usage on inferring pedestal profiles using measurements from the DIII-D tokamak.

physics.plasm-ph↗