arXiv subjects

Matthias Hüls

Publications and source records attributed to Matthias Hüls.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Mean-field Pulse Adaptation for the Circularization of Interacting Rydberg Atoms

Arrays of circular Rydberg atoms provide a promising platform for quantum simulation and computation; however, their preparation in the presence of interatomic interactions remains a major challenge. While optimal control methods have enabled the design of fast and accurate radio-frequency pulses for the circularization of a single atom and of an atom pair, the extension to more atoms is fundamentally limited by the exponential growth of the Hilbert space, which renders numerical simulations computationally infeasible. Here, we introduce an effective model that treats interactions within a mean-field approximation, thereby enabling the simulation of large atomic systems. Our model further enables the adaptation of pulses optimized for non-interacting atoms to interacting systems, based on the computation of a single time evolution. For two interacting $^{87}\mathrm{Rb}$ atoms, we demonstrate that the error of our method remains below $1 \, \%$ and that our adapted pulses recover the initial performance of optimal pulses in the regime of weak to moderate interaction strengths.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Fast Pulses for High-Fidelity Circularization of Interacting Rydberg atoms

Circular states in Rydberg atoms offer a promising platform for quantum computation, quantum simulation and quantum sensing. However, the final step of their preparation - termed as circularization, a process that involves the transfer of a large amount of angular momentum quanta to the valence electron by means of radio-frequency (RF) pulses - remains as a major bottleneck for all technological applications based on interacting circular Rydberg atoms. Even though successfully implemented to circularize an atom cloud in the dilute regime, previous efforts to speed up the circularization process have focused on the single-atom case, thereby neglecting the interactions which constitute one of the main resources for quantum simulation and computation. In this theoretical work we show how interactions between two atoms disturb the efficiency of pulses designed for single atoms and identify shifts induced by the interactions on relevant transition energies as the dominant disturbance. We demonstrate that the initial efficiency of single-atom pulses can be restored by adapting them to these shifts. Our approach is based on a simple functional form depending only on two linear parameters, which we derive analytically. The adapted pulses prepare two $^{87}$Rb atoms after $65 \,$ns in a $n=52$ circular state with a fidelity of at least $95\,\%$ for interatomic distances down to $6.5\,μ$m and for all angular configurations, while also complying experimental amplitude and frequency constraints. Finally, we show that when combining our adapted pulses with Krotov's pulse-shaping algorithm we obtain high-fidelity pulses for any pair arrangement with interatomic distances larger than $5.9\,μ$m. This work demonstrates that fast RF pulses can circularize interacting Rydberg atoms, paving the way toward their technological application.

physics.atom-ph↗

arXiv2022

Benchmarking the performance of portfolio optimization with QAOA

We present a detailed study of portfolio optimization using different versions of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). For a given list of assets, the portfolio optimization problem is formulated as quadratic binary optimization constrained on the number of assets contained in the portfolio. QAOA has been suggested as a possible candidate for solving this problem (and similar combinatorial optimization problems) more efficiently than classical computers in the case of a sufficiently large number of assets. However, the practical implementation of this algorithm requires a careful consideration of several technical issues, not all of which are discussed in the present literature. The present article intends to fill this gap and thereby provide the reader with a useful guide for applying QAOA to the portfolio optimization problem (and similar problems). In particular, we will discuss several possible choices of the variational form and of different classical algorithms for finding the corresponding optimized parameters. Viewing at the application of QAOA on error-prone NISQ hardware, we also analyze the influence of statistical sampling errors (due to a finite number of shots) and gate and readout errors (due to imperfect quantum hardware). Finally, we define a criterion for distinguishing between "easy" and "hard" instances of the portfolio optimization problem

quant-ph↗