SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Max Sibilla

Publications and source records attributed to Max Sibilla.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

HuBMAP Data Portal: a resource for multimodal spatial and single-cell data of healthy human tissues

The NIH Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) Data Portal (https://portal.hubmapconsortium.org/) serves as a comprehensive repository for multimodal, multi-scale spatial and single-cell data from healthy human tissues. As of August 2026, the portal hosts 9,316 public datasets from 26 data types spanning 29 organ classes across 501 donors. Portal infrastructure and user interfaces support data search and discovery, visualization, and analysis directly in web browsers. These capabilities include metadata- and data-driven search, collaborative Workspaces with access to high-performance compute, and interactive Vitessce visualizations across non-spatial, 2D, and 3D spatial datasets. Data-type-specific uniform processing pipelines and rigorous quality control processes ensure comparability of results across laboratories, organs, and donors, while externally processed community-contributed datasets provide complementary perspectives. Here we describe portal functionality, infrastructure, and design, and highlight its role as a platform for large-scale spatial single-cell research across diverse data types, organs, and scales.

q-bio.QM

Creating a Discipline-specific Commons for Infectious Disease Epidemiology

Objective: To create a commons for infectious disease (ID) epidemiology in which epidemiologists, public health officers, data producers, and software developers can not only share data and software, but receive assistance in improving their interoperability. Materials and Methods: We represented 586 datasets, 54 software, and 24 data formats in OWL 2 and then used logical queries to infer potentially interoperable combinations of software and datasets, as well as statistics about the FAIRness of the collection. We represented the objects in DATS 2.2 and a software metadata schema of our own design. We used these representations as the basis for the Content, Search, FAIR-o-meter, and Workflow pages that constitute the MIDAS Digital Commons. Results: Interoperability was limited by lack of standardization of input and output formats of software. When formats existed, they were human-readable specifications (22/24; 92%); only 3 formats (13%) had machine-readable specifications. Nevertheless, logical search of a triple store based on named data formats was able to identify scores of potentially interoperable combinations of software and datasets. Discussion: We improved the findability and availability of a sample of software and datasets and developed metrics for assessing interoperability. The barriers to interoperability included poor documentation of software input/output formats and little attention to standardization of most types of data in this field. Conclusion: Centralizing and formalizing the representation of digital objects within a commons promotes FAIRness, enables its measurement over time and the identification of potentially interoperable combinations of data and software.

cs.SE