arXiv subjects

Mayuko Kori

Publications and source records attributed to Mayuko Kori.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Coalgebraic Non-Wellfounded Proofs: Recursiveness and GTC

Non-wellfounded proof systems impose a global condition called the global trace condition (GTC) on a derivation tree to ensure soundness. Providing a categorical characterisation of the GTC that guarantees soundness remains challenging due to the global, non-compositional nature of these conditions and the infinitary structure of non-wellfounded proofs. We develop a coalgebraic framework for non-wellfounded proof systems where derivation trees are modelled as coalgebras of generalised polynomial functors on presheaves. Since the GTC is a constraint on infinite paths in derivation graphs, we employ graphs of coalgebras and formulate the GTC coalgebraically as a condition on these graphs. Soundness is then formulated as the existence of a unique coalgebra-to-algebra morphism from a coalgebra representing a derivation graph to an algebra specifying semantics. Within this framework, we characterise the GTC via recursive coalgebras: a coalgebra satisfies the GTC if and only if its image under a suitable adjoint is recursive. Under an appropriate assumption on the given semantic algebra, this yields soundness, that is, every proof admits a unique coalgebra-to-algebra morphism. We demonstrate our framework through a non-wellfounded proof system for the modal mu-calculus, one for higher-order fixed-point logics, and a non-wellfounded variant of Santocanale's circular proof system in mu-bicomplete categories.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

From Coalgebraic Determinization to Belief Construction for Partial Observability

The belief construction is a fundamental technique for transforming partially observable systems to fully observable ones while preserving the relevant semantics. It plays a central role in the analysis of partially observable systems, in particular partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs), which is a central model in artificial intelligence and formal verification. In this paper, we develop a coalgebraic framework for the belief construction. To handle observations categorically, we lift a monad to slice categories and introduce a belief decomposition that reorganizes states according to their observations. This allows us to introduce a coalgebraic generalization of the belief construction, obtained by combining the belief decomposition with the coalgebraic determinization of Silva, Bonchi, Bonsangue, and Rutten. In this framework, we show that the semantics of a partially observable system coincides with that of the corresponding belief coalgebra. We then study when the latter further agrees with the semantics of its fully observable counterpart, and use this to identify conditions under which the semantics of a partially observable system coincides with that of the corresponding fully observable belief system. As consequences, we recover the standard equivalence between POMDPs and belief MDPs, and obtain a new equivalence result for weighted transition systems with the semimodule monad.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

A Framework for Coalgebraic Reward-Sensitive Bisimulation (Extended Version)

In this paper we present a framework for modelling \emph{reward-sensitive bisimulations}, that is, bisimulations that account for quantitative differences such as accumulated rewards. To capture both qualitative and quantitative aspects uniformly, we consider two interacting notions of bisimulation: a graded variant that tracks bounded reward differences, and an ungraded one that abstracts from them. Our characterization of these notions is done in the fibrational and coalgebraic approach to (bi)simulation initiated by Hermida and Jacobs. To formally relate the graded and ungraded notions, we deploy categorical gluing, a standard technique in categorical logic. Furthermore, we show that this construction interacts well with standard coalgebra concepts, such as final coalgebras, and that it yields a unified characterization in terms of combined notions of bisimulations under mild assumptions. In order to demonstrate the versatility of our approach, we show how it encompasses various bisimulation notions for different kinds of systems, including relation-based bisimulations for automata with rewards and metric-based notions of bisimulations for labelled Markov processes.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

A Denotational Product Construction for Temporal Verification of Effectful Higher-Order Programs

We propose a categorical framework for linear-time temporal verification of effectful higher-order programs, including probabilistic higher-order programs. Our framework provides a generic denotational reduction -- namely, a denotational product construction -- from linear-time safety verification of effectful higher-order programs to computation of weakest pre-conditions of product programs. This reduction enables us to apply existing algorithms for such well-studied computations of weakest pre-conditions, some of which are available as off-the-shelf solvers. We show the correctness of our denotational product construction by proving a preservation theorem under strong monad morphisms and an existence of suitable liftings along a fibration. We instantiate our framework with both probabilistic and angelic nondeterministic higher-order programs, and implement an automated solver for the probabilistic case based on the existing solver developed by Kura and Unno. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first automated verifier for linear-time temporal verification of probabilistic higher-order programs with recursion.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Initial Algebra Correspondence under Reachability Conditions

Suitable reachability conditions can make two different fixed point semantics of a transition system coincide. For instance, the total and partial expected reward semantics on Markov chains (MCs) coincide whenever the MC at hand is almost surely reachable. In this paper, we present a unifying framework for such reachability conditions that ensures the correspondence of two different semantics. Our categorical framework naturally induces an abstract reachability condition via a suitable adjunction, which allows us to prove coincidences of fixed points, and more generally of initial algebras. We demonstrate the generality of our approach by instantiating several examples, including the almost surely reachability condition for MCs, and the unambiguity condition of automata. We further study a canonical construction of our instance for Markov decision processes by pointwise Kan extensions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

A No-go Theorem for Coalgebraic Product Construction

Verifying traces of systems is a central topic in formal verification. We study model checking of Markov chains (MCs) against temporal properties represented as (finite) automata. For instance, given an MC and a deterministic finite automaton (DFA), a simple but practically useful model checking problem asks for the probability of (terminating) traces accepted by the DFA, which can be computed via a product MC of the given MC and DFA and reduced to a simple reachability problem. Recently, Watanabe, Junges, Rot, and Hasuo proposed coalgebraic product constructions, a categorical framework that uniformly explains such coalgebraic constructions using distributive laws. This framework covers a range of instances, including the model checking of MCs against DFAs. In this paper, on top of their framework we first present a no-go theorem for product constructions, showing a case when we cannot do product constructions for model checking. Specifically, we show that there are no coalgebraic product MCs of MCs and nondeterministic finite automata for computing the probability of the accepting traces. The proof relies on a characterisation of natural transformations between certain functors that determine the type of branching, including nondeterministic or probabilistic branching. Second, we present a coalgebraic product construction of MCs and multiset finite automata (MFAs) as a new instance within our framework. This construction addresses a model checking problem that asks for the expected number of accepting runs on MFAs over traces of MCs. We show that this problem is solvable in polynomial time.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Composing Codensity Bisimulations

Proving compositionality of behavioral equivalence on state-based systems with respect to algebraic operations is a classical and widely studied problem. We study a categorical formulation of this problem, where operations on state-based systems modeled as coalgebras can be elegantly captured through distributive laws between functors. To prove compositionality, it then suffices to show that this distributive law lifts from sets to relations, giving an explanation of how behavioral equivalence on smaller systems can be combined to obtain behavioral equivalence on the composed system. In this paper, we refine this approach by focusing on so-called codensity lifting of functors, which gives a very generic presentation of various notions of (bi)similarity as well as quantitative notions such as behavioral metrics on probabilistic systems. The key idea is to use codensity liftings both at the level of algebras and coalgebras, using a new generalization of the codensity lifting. The problem of lifting distributive laws then reduces to the abstract problem of constructing distributive laws between codensity liftings, for which we propose a simplified sufficient condition. Our sufficient condition instantiates to concrete proof methods for compositionality of algebraic operations on various types of state-based systems. We instantiate our results to prove compositionality of qualitative and quantitative properties of deterministic automata. We also explore the limits of our approach by including an example of probabilistic systems, where it is unclear whether the sufficient condition holds, and instead we use our setting to give a direct proof of compositionality. ...

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Exploiting Adjoints in Property Directed Reachability Analysis

We formulate, in lattice-theoretic terms, two novel algorithms inspired by Bradley's property directed reachability algorithm. For finding safe invariants or counterexamples, the first algorithm exploits over-approximations of both forward and backward transition relations, expressed abstractly by the notion of adjoints. In the absence of adjoints, one can use the second algorithm, which exploits lower sets and their principals. As a notable example of application, we consider quantitative reachability problems for Markov Decision Processes.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

The Lattice-Theoretic Essence of Property Directed Reachability Analysis

We present LT-PDR, a lattice-theoretic generalization of Bradley's property directed reachability analysis (PDR) algorithm. LT-PDR identifies the essence of PDR to be an ingenious combination of verification and refutation attempts based on the Knaster-Tarski and Kleene theorems. We introduce four concrete instances of LT-PDR, derive their implementation from a generic Haskell implementation of LT-PDR, and experimentally evaluate them. We also present a categorical structural theory that derives these instances.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Fibrational Initial Algebra-Final Coalgebra Coincidence over Initial Algebras: Turning Verification Witnesses Upside Down

The coincidence between initial algebras (IAs) and final coalgebras (FCs) is a phenomenon that underpins various important results in theoretical computer science. In this paper, we identify a general fibrational condition for the IA-FC coincidence, namely in the fiber over an initial algebra in the base category. Identifying (co)algebras in a fiber as (co)inductive predicates, our fibrational IA-FC coincidence allows one to use coinductive witnesses (such as invariants) for verifying inductive properties (such as liveness). Our general fibrational theory features the technical condition of stability of chain colimits; we extend the framework to the presence of a monadic effect, too, restricting to fibrations of complete lattice-valued predicates. Practical benefits of our categorical theory are exemplified by new "upside-down" witness notions for three verification problems: probabilistic liveness, and acceptance and model-checking with respect to bottom-up tree automata.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

A Cyclic Proof System for HFLN

A cyclic proof system allows us to perform inductive reasoning without explicit inductions. We propose a cyclic proof system for HFLN, which is a higher-order predicate logic with natural numbers and alternating fixed-points. Ours is the first cyclic proof system for a higher-order logic, to our knowledge. Due to the presence of higher-order predicates and alternating fixed-points, our cyclic proof system requires a more delicate global condition on cyclic proofs than the original system of Brotherston and Simpson. We prove the decidability of checking the global condition and soundness of this system, and also prove a restricted form of standard completeness for an infinitary variant of our cyclic proof system. A potential application of our cyclic proof system is semi-automated verification of higher-order programs, based on Kobayashi et al.'s recent work on reductions from program verification to HFLN validity checking.

cs.LO↗