SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Mehrshad Taziki

Publications and source records attributed to Mehrshad Taziki.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

A Linear-Time Approximation Scheme for the Densest Subgraph Problem

In the undirected \emph{Densest Subgraph Problem (DSG)} the goal is to output a subset $S$ of vertices of a given graph $G$ that maximizes the quantity $|E(S)|/|S|$, where $E(S)$ is the set of edges in the subgraph induced by $S$. The problem is well studied in both theory and practice, and it admits natural efficient exact algorithms, as well as near-linear time algorithms with a $(1-\varepsilon)$ approximation ratio. However, all previously-known approximation schemes incur logarithmic factors in the size of the graph or other parameters of the graph. This raises the question of whether a linear time $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation can be obtained for all $\varepsilon>0$. We answer this question affirmatively by providing a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm running in time $O\left(\frac{n+m}{\varepsilon^3}\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$, where $m$ and $n$ are respectively the number of edges and vertices of $G$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first truly linear-time approximation scheme for the problem (when $\varepsilon>0$ is a constant). Our algorithm uses assignments arising from a flow-based formulation together with a structural carving lemma. This lemma allows us to progressively carve "sparse" parts of the graph while nearly preserving the densest subgraph, allowing us to shift heavy computations to smaller instances, which eventually yields the mentioned runtime. Our framework also yields a $(1/2 -\varepsilon)$-approximation for the \emph{Densest At-Least-$k$ Subgraph Problem}, where in addition to maximizing the density, we require the subgraph to have at least $k$ vertices. Our algorithm runs in time $O\left( \frac{(n+m) \log^2 n \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}}{\varepsilon} \right)$. This nearly matches the known $1/2$ approximation hardness while running in near-linear time.

cs.DS

Dual Charging for Half-Integral TSP

We show that the max entropy algorithm is a randomized 1.49776 approximation for half-integral TSP, improving upon the previous known bound of 1.49993 from Karlin et al. This also improves upon the best-known approximation for half-integral TSP due to Gupta et al. Our improvement results from using the dual, instead of the primal, to analyze the expected cost of the matching. We believe this method of analysis could lead to a simpler proof that max entropy is a better-than-3/2 approximation in the general case. We also give a 1.4671 approximation for half integral LP solutions with no proper minimum cuts and an even number of vertices, improving upon the bound of Haddadan and Newman of 1.476. We then extend the analysis to the case when there are an odd number of vertices $n$ at the cost of an additional $O(1/n)$ factor.

cs.DS

On the Ratio of Shannon Numbers of Graphs

Let $Γ$ be a function that maps two arbitrary graphs $G$ and $H$ to a non-negative real number such that $$α(G^{\boxtimes n})\leq α(H^{\boxtimes n})Γ(G,H)^n$$ where $n$ is any natural number and $G^{\boxtimes n}$ is the strong product of $G$ with itself $n$ times. We establish the equivalence of two different approaches for finding such a function $Γ$. The common solution obtained through either approach is termed ``the relative fractional independence number of a graph $G$ with respect to another graph $H$". We show this function by $α^*(G|H)$ and discuss some of its properties. In particular, we show that $α^*(G|H)\geq \frac{X(G)}{X(H)} \geq \frac{1}{α^*(H|G)},$ where $X(G)$ can be the independence number, the Shannon capacity, the fractional independence number, the Lovász number, or the Schrijver's or Szegedy's variants of the Lovász number of a graph $G$. This inequality is the first explicit non-trivial upper bound on the ratio of the invariants of two arbitrary graphs, as mentioned earlier, which can also be used to obtain upper or lower bounds for these invariants. As explicit applications, we present new upper bounds for the ratio of the Shannon capacity of two Cayley graphs and compute new lower bounds on the Shannon capacity of certain Johnson graphs (yielding the exact value of their Haemers number). Moreover, we show that $α^*(G|H)$ can be used to present a stronger version of the well-known No-Homomorphism Lemma.

math.CO

Relative Fractional Packing Number and Its Properties

The concept of the \textit{relative fractional packing number} between two graphs $G$ and $H$, initially introduced in arXiv:2307.06155 [math.CO], serves as an upper bound for the ratio of the zero-error Shannon capacity of these graphs. Defined as: \begin{equation*} \sup\limits_{W} \frac{α(G \boxtimes W)}{α(H \boxtimes W)} \end{equation*} where the supremum is computed over all arbitrary graphs and $\boxtimes$ denotes the strong product of graphs. This article delves into various critical theorems regarding the computation of this number. Specifically, we address its NP-hardness and the complexity of approximating it. Furthermore, we develop a conjecture for necessary and sufficient conditions for this number to be less than one. We also validate this conjecture for specific graph families. Additionally, we present miscellaneous concepts and introduce a generalized version of the independence number that gives insights that could significantly contribute to the study of the relative fractional packing number.

math.CO