Melih Coşğun | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Inclusive Federated Learning Through Compliance-Weighted Noise Allocation in Healthcare AI

Background: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of clinical AI models without centralizing patient data, but adoption is limited by privacy concerns, heterogeneous institutional compliance, and resource disparities; standard differential privacy (DP) applies uniform noise to all clients, penalizing well-compliant or under-resourced institutions. Objective: We introduce a compliance-aware FL framework that adapts DP to institutional compliance, letting lower-compliance sites participate without uniformly penalizing others. Methods: A compliance scoring tool aligned with HIPAA, GDPR, NIST, ISO, and HL7/FHIR maps each client score to a per-step Gaussian noise scale for server-side DP-SGD on a small aggregator dataset. The formal $(ε,δ)$ bound applies to the aggregator dataset under a semi-honest aggregator; client-level DP needs secure aggregation (future work). We evaluate five FL strategies on PneumoniaMNIST and BreastMNIST (16 clients, 50 rounds, five seeds); the cumulative aggregator-dataset $ε$ is about 1434 (Breast) and 513 (Pneumonia) at $δ=10^{-5}$. Results: Including 12 lower-compliance clients (Experiment 1) versus a compliant-only baseline (Experiment 4) changed BreastMNIST accuracy by +4.5 (FedAvg), +6.8 (FedMedian), +5.2 (FedProx), +1.6 (FedYogi), and -4.1 (FedAdam) percentage points (pooled +2.8 pp; not significant at n=5; up to +17 pp per configuration); compliance-weighted allocation matched uniform server-side DP at equal mean noise (+0.1 pp), carrying no utility penalty, and first-round noise cost 1.3 pp (Breast) and 2.5 pp (Pneumonia, FedAvg). Conclusions: Compliance-weighted server-side DP lets lower-compliance institutions join FL without degrading performance, giving auditable per-site noise control at no utility cost; formal guarantees apply to the aggregator dataset, with client-level DP requiring secure aggregation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Bridging Local and Federated Data Normalization in Federated Learning: A Privacy-Preserving Approach

Data normalization is a crucial preprocessing step for enhancing model performance and training stability. In federated learning (FL), where data remains distributed across multiple parties during collaborative model training, normalization presents unique challenges due to the decentralized and often heterogeneous nature of the data. Traditional methods rely on either independent client-side processing, i.e., local normalization, or normalizing the entire dataset before distributing it to parties, i.e., pooled normalization. Local normalization can be problematic when data distributions across parties are non-IID, while the pooled normalization approach conflicts with the decentralized nature of FL. In this paper, we explore the adaptation of widely used normalization techniques to FL and define the term federated normalization. Federated normalization simulates pooled normalization by enabling the collaborative exchange of normalization parameters among parties. Thus, it achieves performance on par with pooled normalization without compromising data locality. However, sharing normalization parameters such as the mean introduces potential privacy risks, which we further mitigate through a robust privacy-preserving solution. Our contributions include: (i) We systematically evaluate the impact of various federated and local normalization techniques in heterogeneous FL scenarios, (ii) We propose a novel homomorphically encrypted $k$-th ranked element (and median) calculation tailored for the federated setting, enabling secure and efficient federated normalization, (iii) We propose privacy-preserving implementations of widely used normalization techniques for FL, leveraging multiparty fully homomorphic encryption (MHE).

cs.CR↗