arXiv subjects

Mensur Omerbashich

Publications and source records attributed to Mensur Omerbashich.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Global coupling mechanism of Sun resonant forcing of Mars, Moon, and Earth seismicity

Global seismicity on all three solar system's bodies with in situ measurements (Earth, Moon, and Mars) is due mainly to mechanical Rieger resonance (RR) of the solar wind's macroscopic flapping, driven by the well-known PRg=~154-day Rieger period and detected commonly in most heliophysical data types and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). Thus, InSight mission marsquakes rates are periodic with PRg as characterized by a very high (>>12) fidelity {\Phi}=2.8 10^6 and by being the only >99%-significant spectral peak in the 385.8-64.3-nHz (1-180-day) band of highest planetary energies; the longest-span (v.9) release of raw data revealed the entire RR, excluding a tectonically active Mars. For check, I analyze rates of Oct 2015-Feb 2019, Mw5.6+ earthquakes, and all (1969-1977) Apollo mission moonquakes. To decouple magnetosphere and IMF effects, I study Earth and Moon seismicity during traversals of Earth magnetotail vs. IMF. The analysis showed with >99-67% confidence and {\Phi}>>12 fidelity that (an unspecified majority of) moonquakes and Mw5.6+ earthquakes also recur at Rieger periods. About half of spectral peaks split but also into clusters that average to usual Rieger periodicities, where magnetotail reconnecting clears the signal. Moonquakes are mostly forced at times of solar-wind resonance and not just during tides, as previously and simplistically believed. Earlier claims that solar plasma dynamics could be seismogenic are confirmed. This result calls for reinterpreting the seismicity phenomenon and for reliance on global magnitude scales. Predictability of solar-wind macroscopic dynamics is now within reach, which paves the way for long-term physics-based seismic and space weather prediction and the safety of space missions. Gauss-Vanicek Spectral Analysis revolutionizes geophysics by computing nonlinear global dynamics directly (renders approximating of dynamics obsolete).

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2023

The Sun as a revolving-field magnetic alternator with a wobbling-core rotator from real data

Rather than as a star classically assumed to feature elusive dynamo or a proverbial engine and impulsively alternating polarity, the Sun reveals itself in the 385.8-2.439-nHz (1-mo-13-yr) band of polar ({\phi}Sun>|70{\deg}|) wind's decadal dynamics, dominated by fast (>700 km s^-1) winds, as a globally completely vibrating revolving-field magnetic alternator at work at all times. Thus North-South separation of 1994-2008 Ulysses <10 nT wind polar samplings reveals spectral signatures of an entirely >99%-significant Sun-borne global sharp Alfven resonance (AR) governed by Ps=~11-yr Schwabe global damping (equilibrium) mode northside, ~10-yr degeneration equatorially, and ~9-yr southside. AR is accompanied by a symmetrical antiresonance P(-) whose both N/S tailing harmonics P(-17) are the well-known PR=~154-day (Ps/3/3/3 to +-0.1%) Rieger period dominating solar-system (planetary) dynamics and space weather. Upward drifting low-frequency trends reveal a rigid core; undertones a core offset away from apex. Core wobble at 2.2+/-0.1-yr triggers AR. Multiple total spectral symmetries of solar activity (historical solar-cycle lengths, sunspot and calcium numbers) expose the solar alternator moderating sunspots, nanoflares and CMEs that resemble machinery sparking. Unlike a resonating motor restrained from separating its casing, the cageless Sun lacks a stator and vibrates freely, resulting in all-spin and mass release (fast winds) in an axial shake-off beyond L1. The result was verified against remote data and the experiment, replacing dynamo with magnetoalternator and advancing basic knowledge on the >100 billion trillions solar-type stars. Shannon's theory-based Gauss-Vanicek spectral analysis revolutionizes astrophysics by rigorously simulating fleet formations from a single spacecraft and physics by computing nonlinear global dynamics directly (rendering spherical approximation obsolete).

astro-ph.SR↗

arXiv2022

Spectral evidence from global geomagnetic calibration for stellar-system resonances constraining both quantum physics and geophysics

In 1984, Clarke expanded the domain of observed quantum phenomena from the microscopic regimes of atoms and electrons (10^1-10^3 particles) to macroscopic superconducting circuits exhibiting quantum coherence (10^9-10^12). I show the coherent quantum behavior persists at scales far beyond atoms and circuits: in Earth's (10^51) resonant geophysical cycles, manifesting astro-macroscopic time-crystalline behavior. Thus, based on arguably the most accurate and precise spectral analysis of the most accurate global geomagnetism calibration (CKGPTS95), macroscopic and microscopic phenomena are interconnected through gravitational resonance networks across the cosmos, annulling conventional views of quantum invariance. The analyses unveiled a planet-dominating 9.35-My fundamental cycle arising from Earth's orbital and stellar gravitational influences, which resonantly governs long-term geomagnetic reversals, planetary growth, stratigraphic anomalies that mimic periodic mass extinctions, and the Great Unconformity. The resonances exhibit non-geophysical features of quantum coherence classically confined to microscopic systems, such as time crystals: discrete time-translation symmetry, fractional harmonic locking, and many-body entrainment. Given the ubiquity of the tidal phenomenon, a resonance-based framework exists in which large-scale celestial dynamics calibrate quantum analogously to how extragalactic dynamics calibrate stellar - thereby constraining particle masses, coupling constants, and universal parameters. This data-driven proof completes my 2006 theoretical derivation of G (and thus gravity) from c at both quantum and everyday scales, and confirms the Hyperresonance Unifying Theory, which unified those domains using only high-school algebra arXiv:0801.0876.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2012

Astronomical alignments as the cause of ~M6+ seismicity

I here demonstrate empirically my georesonator concept in which tidally induced magnification of Earth masses' resonance causes seismicity on Earth. I show that all strong (~M6+) earthquakes of 2010 occurred during Earth's long (t > 3 days) astronomical alignments within our solar system. I then show that the same holds true for all very strong (~M8+) earthquakes of the decade of 2000's. Finally, strongest (M8.6+) earthquakes of the past century are shown to have occurred during Earth's multiple long alignments, too, whereas half of the high-strongest (M9+) earthquakes occurred during Full Moon. To add robustness, I include alignments to comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin) as the only heavenly body currently in our solar system besides planets, and show that it impacted very strong seismicity since 2007. I conclude my empirical demonstration with a six-month, 100%-successful forecast of M6+ magnification, performed online in near real-time from October 2011 until April 2012, and which shows always the same, fractal pattern of intensifying-peaking-diminishing of strong earthquakes' strength during long alignments, and the absence of the pattern outside alignments. Days without killer quake can now be known exactly, amounting to several months a year of exact seismic forecast (telling with certainty there will be no strong seisms on that-and-that date). Approximate forecast of strength and timing of strong earthquakes is feasible for the rest of the year, as well as of location once the alignment starts. I thus verified my hyperresonator concept too, arrived at earlier as a mathematical-physical solution to the most general extension of georesonator. As gravity can now be expressed in terms of speed of light, hyperresonance is akin to tuning forks triggering each other at a distance, inferring the existence of aether required for propagation of mutually tuning (interfering) oscillations in Space.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2009

2D Riemann-Christoffel curvature tensor via a 3D space using a specialized permutation scheme

When a space in which Christoffel symbols of the second kind are symmetrical in lower indices exists, it makes for a supplement to the standard procedure when a 2D surface is normally induced from the geometry of the surrounding 3D space in which the surface is embedded. There it appears appropriate to use a scheme for straightforward permutation of indices of Gkij, when such a space would make this transformation possible, so as to obtain the components of the 2D Riemann-Christoffel tensor (here expressed in geodetic coordinates for an ellipsoid of revolution, of use in geophysics). By applying my scheme I find the corresponding indices in 2D and 3D supplement-spaces, and I compute components of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor. By operating over the elements of the projections alone, the all-known value of 1/MN for the Gaussian curvature on an ellipsoid of revolution is obtained. To further validate my scheme, I show that in such a 3D space the tangent vector to a PHI-curve for LAM=const1 would be parallel to a tangent vector to a PHI-curve for LAM=const2 on the surface of an ellipsoid of revolution. Surfaces parameterized by Gauss surface normal coordinates, such as the Earth, now can have the Riemann-Christopher curvature tensor computed in a straightforward fashion for the topographic surface hel(PHIel, LAMel) of the Earth, given Christoffel symbols for such a representation in terms of orthonormal functions on the ellipsoid of revolution.

physics.gen-ph↗

arXiv2008

Note on: "Inevitability of Plate Tectonics on Super-Earths" by Valencia, O Connell and Sasselov, arXiv preprint 0710.0699

Valencia et al. recently claimed that the mass of a Super-Earth (SE) is a sole factor in determining whether a SE is tectonically active or not. However, mass resolving astrometry is unable to discern between a SE and its moons if any. The fact that no exomoons have been discovered yet is rather a matter of instrumentation imperfection at the present, not of physical absence of exomoons. This, with recently discovered relationships between geometric and physical properties in astronomical bodies (Transiting planets; the Earth) makes it impossible to know yet if the Wageners (here constraining) supposition on somehow-tidally caused tectonics holds universally or not also.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2008

Stochastic resonance for exploration geophysics

Stochastic resonance (SR) is a phenomenon in which signal to noise (SN) ratio gets improved by noise addition rather than removal as envisaged classically. SR was first claimed in climatology a few decades ago and then in other disciplines as well. The same as it is observed in natural systems, SR is used also for allowable SN enhancements at will. Here I report a proof of principle that SR can be useful in exploration geophysics. For this I perform high frequency GaussVanicek variance spectral analyses (GVSA) of model traces characterized by varying levels of complexity, completeness and pollution. This demonstration justifies all further research on SR in applied geophysics, as energy demands and depletion of reachable supplies potentially make SR vital in a near future.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2006

Springtide-induced magnification of Earth mantle resonance causes tectonics and conceals universality of physics at all scales

I demonstrate two fundamental contributions. First, the Earth tectonics is generally a consequence of the springtide-induced magnification of mechanical resonance in the Earth mantle. The same mechanism that causes bridges to collapse under the soldiers step-marching makes also the Earth lithosphere fail under the springtide-induced magnification of the mantle resonance resulting in strong earthquakes. Secondly, by generalizing the above finding onto any body anywhere in all the Universes and at all times, I find that there is no distinction between physics at intergalactic, Newtonian, quantum, and smaller scales. Thus, the so-called constant of proportionality of physics, G, is not a constant but a parameter of a most general form: G = s e^2, nonlinearly varying amongst different scales s. Any scale-related variations of physics, erroneously recognized as such by Einstein and Planck, are only apparent and arise as a consequence of the Earth mantle springtide-induced extreme resonance, which is also critically impeding any terrestrial experiments aimed at estimating the final proportionality G. Gravitation is explained if simply regarded mechanical and repulsive.

physics.geo-ph↗