arXiv subjects

Michał Dereziński

Publications and source records attributed to Michał Dereziński.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2021

Sparse sketches with small inversion bias

For a tall $n\times d$ matrix $A$ and a random $m\times n$ sketching matrix $S$, the sketched estimate of the inverse covariance matrix $(A^\top A)^{-1}$ is typically biased: $E[(\tilde A^\top\tilde A)^{-1}]\ne(A^\top A)^{-1}$, where $\tilde A=SA$. This phenomenon, which we call inversion bias, arises, e.g., in statistics and distributed optimization, when averaging multiple independently constructed estimates of quantities that depend on the inverse covariance. We develop a framework for analyzing inversion bias, based on our proposed concept of an $(ε,δ)$-unbiased estimator for random matrices. We show that when the sketching matrix $S$ is dense and has i.i.d. sub-gaussian entries, then after simple rescaling, the estimator $(\frac m{m-d}\tilde A^\top\tilde A)^{-1}$ is $(ε,δ)$-unbiased for $(A^\top A)^{-1}$ with a sketch of size $m=O(d+\sqrt d/ε)$. This implies that for $m=O(d)$, the inversion bias of this estimator is $O(1/\sqrt d)$, which is much smaller than the $Θ(1)$ approximation error obtained as a consequence of the subspace embedding guarantee for sub-gaussian sketches. We then propose a new sketching technique, called LEverage Score Sparsified (LESS) embeddings, which uses ideas from both data-oblivious sparse embeddings as well as data-aware leverage-based row sampling methods, to get $ε$ inversion bias for sketch size $m=O(d\log d+\sqrt d/ε)$ in time $O(\text{nnz}(A)\log n+md^2)$, where nnz is the number of non-zeros. The key techniques enabling our analysis include an extension of a classical inequality of Bai and Silverstein for random quadratic forms, which we call the Restricted Bai-Silverstein inequality; and anti-concentration of the Binomial distribution via the Paley-Zygmund inequality, which we use to prove a lower bound showing that leverage score sampling sketches generally do not achieve small inversion bias.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Query Complexity of Least Absolute Deviation Regression via Robust Uniform Convergence

Consider a regression problem where the learner is given a large collection of $d$-dimensional data points, but can only query a small subset of the real-valued labels. How many queries are needed to obtain a $1+ε$ relative error approximation of the optimum? While this problem has been extensively studied for least squares regression, little is known for other losses. An important example is least absolute deviation regression ($\ell_1$ regression) which enjoys superior robustness to outliers compared to least squares. We develop a new framework for analyzing importance sampling methods in regression problems, which enables us to show that the query complexity of least absolute deviation regression is $Θ(d/ε^2)$ up to logarithmic factors. We further extend our techniques to show the first bounds on the query complexity for any $\ell_p$ loss with $p\in(1,2)$. As a key novelty in our analysis, we introduce the notion of robust uniform convergence, which is a new approximation guarantee for the empirical loss. While it is inspired by uniform convergence in statistical learning, our approach additionally incorporates a correction term to avoid unnecessary variance due to outliers. This can be viewed as a new connection between statistical learning theory and variance reduction techniques in stochastic optimization, which should be of independent interest.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Improved guarantees and a multiple-descent curve for Column Subset Selection and the Nyström method

The Column Subset Selection Problem (CSSP) and the Nyström method are among the leading tools for constructing small low-rank approximations of large datasets in machine learning and scientific computing. A fundamental question in this area is: how well can a data subset of size k compete with the best rank k approximation? We develop techniques which exploit spectral properties of the data matrix to obtain improved approximation guarantees which go beyond the standard worst-case analysis. Our approach leads to significantly better bounds for datasets with known rates of singular value decay, e.g., polynomial or exponential decay. Our analysis also reveals an intriguing phenomenon: the approximation factor as a function of k may exhibit multiple peaks and valleys, which we call a multiple-descent curve. A lower bound we establish shows that this behavior is not an artifact of our analysis, but rather it is an inherent property of the CSSP and Nyström tasks. Finally, using the example of a radial basis function (RBF) kernel, we show that both our improved bounds and the multiple-descent curve can be observed on real datasets simply by varying the RBF parameter.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Debiasing Distributed Second Order Optimization with Surrogate Sketching and Scaled Regularization

In distributed second order optimization, a standard strategy is to average many local estimates, each of which is based on a small sketch or batch of the data. However, the local estimates on each machine are typically biased, relative to the full solution on all of the data, and this can limit the effectiveness of averaging. Here, we introduce a new technique for debiasing the local estimates, which leads to both theoretical and empirical improvements in the convergence rate of distributed second order methods. Our technique has two novel components: (1) modifying standard sketching techniques to obtain what we call a surrogate sketch; and (2) carefully scaling the global regularization parameter for local computations. Our surrogate sketches are based on determinantal point processes, a family of distributions for which the bias of an estimate of the inverse Hessian can be computed exactly. Based on this computation, we show that when the objective being minimized is $l_2$-regularized with parameter $λ$ and individual machines are each given a sketch of size $m$, then to eliminate the bias, local estimates should be computed using a shrunk regularization parameter given by $λ^{\prime}=λ\cdot(1-\frac{d_λ}{m})$, where $d_λ$ is the $λ$-effective dimension of the Hessian (or, for quadratic problems, the data matrix).

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Sampling from a $k$-DPP without looking at all items

Determinantal point processes (DPPs) are a useful probabilistic model for selecting a small diverse subset out of a large collection of items, with applications in summarization, stochastic optimization, active learning and more. Given a kernel function and a subset size $k$, our goal is to sample $k$ out of $n$ items with probability proportional to the determinant of the kernel matrix induced by the subset (a.k.a. $k$-DPP). Existing $k$-DPP sampling algorithms require an expensive preprocessing step which involves multiple passes over all $n$ items, making it infeasible for large datasets. A naïve heuristic addressing this problem is to uniformly subsample a fraction of the data and perform $k$-DPP sampling only on those items, however this method offers no guarantee that the produced sample will even approximately resemble the target distribution over the original dataset. In this paper, we develop an algorithm which adaptively builds a sufficiently large uniform sample of data that is then used to efficiently generate a smaller set of $k$ items, while ensuring that this set is drawn exactly from the target distribution defined on all $n$ items. We show empirically that our algorithm produces a $k$-DPP sample after observing only a small fraction of all elements, leading to several orders of magnitude faster performance compared to the state-of-the-art.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random design

Double descent refers to the phase transition that is exhibited by the generalization error of unregularized learning models when varying the ratio between the number of parameters and the number of training samples. The recent success of highly over-parameterized machine learning models such as deep neural networks has motivated a theoretical analysis of the double descent phenomenon in classical models such as linear regression which can also generalize well in the over-parameterized regime. We provide the first exact non-asymptotic expressions for double descent of the minimum norm linear estimator. Our approach involves constructing a special determinantal point process which we call surrogate random design, to replace the standard i.i.d. design of the training sample. This surrogate design admits exact expressions for the mean squared error of the estimator while preserving the key properties of the standard design. We also establish an exact implicit regularization result for over-parameterized training samples. In particular, we show that, for the surrogate design, the implicit bias of the unregularized minimum norm estimator precisely corresponds to solving a ridge-regularized least squares problem on the population distribution. In our analysis we introduce a new mathematical tool of independent interest: the class of random matrices for which determinant commutes with expectation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Determinantal Point Processes in Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra

Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra (RandNLA) uses randomness to develop improved algorithms for matrix problems that arise in scientific computing, data science, machine learning, etc. Determinantal Point Processes (DPPs), a seemingly unrelated topic in pure and applied mathematics, is a class of stochastic point processes with probability distribution characterized by sub-determinants of a kernel matrix. Recent work has uncovered deep and fruitful connections between DPPs and RandNLA which lead to new guarantees and improved algorithms that are of interest to both areas. We provide an overview of this exciting new line of research, including brief introductions to RandNLA and DPPs, as well as applications of DPPs to classical linear algebra tasks such as least squares regression, low-rank approximation and the Nyström method. For example, random sampling with a DPP leads to new kinds of unbiased estimators for least squares, enabling more refined statistical and inferential understanding of these algorithms; a DPP is, in some sense, an optimal randomized algorithm for the Nyström method; and a RandNLA technique called leverage score sampling can be derived as the marginal distribution of a DPP. We also discuss recent algorithmic developments, illustrating that, while not quite as efficient as standard RandNLA techniques, DPP-based algorithms are only moderately more expensive.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Isotropy and Log-Concave Polynomials: Accelerated Sampling and High-Precision Counting of Matroid Bases

We define a notion of isotropy for discrete set distributions. If $μ$ is a distribution over subsets $S$ of a ground set $[n]$, we say that $μ$ is in isotropic position if $P[e \in S]$ is the same for all $e\in [n]$. We design a new approximate sampling algorithm that leverages isotropy for the class of distributions $μ$ that have a log-concave generating polynomial; this class includes determinantal point processes, strongly Rayleigh distributions, and uniform distributions over matroid bases. We show that when $μ$ is in approximately isotropic position, the running time of our algorithm depends polynomially on the size of the set $S$, and only logarithmically on $n$. When $n$ is much larger than the size of $S$, this is significantly faster than prior algorithms, and can even be sublinear in $n$. We then show how to transform a non-isotropic $μ$ into an equivalent approximately isotropic form with a polynomial-time preprocessing step, accelerating subsequent sampling times. The main new ingredient enabling our algorithms is a class of negative dependence inequalities that may be of independent interest. As an application of our results, we show how to approximately count bases of a matroid of rank $k$ over a ground set of $n$ elements to within a factor of $1+ε$ in time $ O((n+1/ε^2)\cdot poly(k, \log n))$. This is the first algorithm that runs in nearly linear time for fixed rank $k$, and achieves an inverse polynomially low approximation error.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Convergence Analysis of Block Coordinate Algorithms with Determinantal Sampling

We analyze the convergence rate of the randomized Newton-like method introduced by Qu et. al. (2016) for smooth and convex objectives, which uses random coordinate blocks of a Hessian-over-approximation matrix $\bM$ instead of the true Hessian. The convergence analysis of the algorithm is challenging because of its complex dependence on the structure of $\bM$. However, we show that when the coordinate blocks are sampled with probability proportional to their determinant, the convergence rate depends solely on the eigenvalue distribution of matrix $\bM$, and has an analytically tractable form. To do so, we derive a fundamental new expectation formula for determinantal point processes. We show that determinantal sampling allows us to reason about the optimal subset size of blocks in terms of the spectrum of $\bM$. Additionally, we provide a numerical evaluation of our analysis, demonstrating cases where determinantal sampling is superior or on par with uniform sampling.

math.NA↗

arXiv2019

Exact sampling of determinantal point processes with sublinear time preprocessing

We study the complexity of sampling from a distribution over all index subsets of the set $\{1,...,n\}$ with the probability of a subset $S$ proportional to the determinant of the submatrix $\mathbf{L}_S$ of some $n\times n$ p.s.d. matrix $\mathbf{L}$, where $\mathbf{L}_S$ corresponds to the entries of $\mathbf{L}$ indexed by $S$. Known as a determinantal point process, this distribution is used in machine learning to induce diversity in subset selection. In practice, we often wish to sample multiple subsets $S$ with small expected size $k = E[|S|] \ll n$ from a very large matrix $\mathbf{L}$, so it is important to minimize the preprocessing cost of the procedure (performed once) as well as the sampling cost (performed repeatedly). For this purpose, we propose a new algorithm which, given access to $\mathbf{L}$, samples exactly from a determinantal point process while satisfying the following two properties: (1) its preprocessing cost is $n \cdot \text{poly}(k)$, i.e., sublinear in the size of $\mathbf{L}$, and (2) its sampling cost is $\text{poly}(k)$, i.e., independent of the size of $\mathbf{L}$. Prior to our results, state-of-the-art exact samplers required $O(n^3)$ preprocessing time and sampling time linear in $n$ or dependent on the spectral properties of $\mathbf{L}$. We also give a reduction which allows using our algorithm for exact sampling from cardinality constrained determinantal point processes with $n\cdot\text{poly}(k)$ time preprocessing.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

Bayesian experimental design using regularized determinantal point processes

In experimental design, we are given $n$ vectors in $d$ dimensions, and our goal is to select $k\ll n$ of them to perform expensive measurements, e.g., to obtain labels/responses, for a linear regression task. Many statistical criteria have been proposed for choosing the optimal design, with popular choices including A- and D-optimality. If prior knowledge is given, typically in the form of a $d\times d$ precision matrix $\mathbf A$, then all of the criteria can be extended to incorporate that information via a Bayesian framework. In this paper, we demonstrate a new fundamental connection between Bayesian experimental design and determinantal point processes, the latter being widely used for sampling diverse subsets of data. We use this connection to develop new efficient algorithms for finding $(1+ε)$-approximations of optimal designs under four optimality criteria: A, C, D and V. Our algorithms can achieve this when the desired subset size $k$ is $Ω(\frac{d_{\mathbf A}}ε + \frac{\log 1/ε}{ε^2})$, where $d_{\mathbf A}\leq d$ is the $\mathbf A$-effective dimension, which can often be much smaller than $d$. Our results offer direct improvements over a number of prior works, for both Bayesian and classical experimental design, in terms of algorithm efficiency, approximation quality, and range of applicable criteria.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

Distributed estimation of the inverse Hessian by determinantal averaging

In distributed optimization and distributed numerical linear algebra, we often encounter an inversion bias: if we want to compute a quantity that depends on the inverse of a sum of distributed matrices, then the sum of the inverses does not equal the inverse of the sum. An example of this occurs in distributed Newton's method, where we wish to compute (or implicitly work with) the inverse Hessian multiplied by the gradient. In this case, locally computed estimates are biased, and so taking a uniform average will not recover the correct solution. To address this, we propose determinantal averaging, a new approach for correcting the inversion bias. This approach involves reweighting the local estimates of the Newton's step proportionally to the determinant of the local Hessian estimate, and then averaging them together to obtain an improved global estimate. This method provides the first known distributed Newton step that is asymptotically consistent, i.e., it recovers the exact step in the limit as the number of distributed partitions grows to infinity. To show this, we develop new expectation identities and moment bounds for the determinant and adjugate of a random matrix. Determinantal averaging can be applied not only to Newton's method, but to computing any quantity that is a linear tranformation of a matrix inverse, e.g., taking a trace of the inverse covariance matrix, which is used in data uncertainty quantification.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

Fast determinantal point processes via distortion-free intermediate sampling

Given a fixed $n\times d$ matrix $\mathbf{X}$, where $n\gg d$, we study the complexity of sampling from a distribution over all subsets of rows where the probability of a subset is proportional to the squared volume of the parallelepiped spanned by the rows (a.k.a. a determinantal point process). In this task, it is important to minimize the preprocessing cost of the procedure (performed once) as well as the sampling cost (performed repeatedly). To that end, we propose a new determinantal point process algorithm which has the following two properties, both of which are novel: (1) a preprocessing step which runs in time $O(\text{number-of-non-zeros}(\mathbf{X})\cdot\log n)+\text{poly}(d)$, and (2) a sampling step which runs in $\text{poly}(d)$ time, independent of the number of rows $n$. We achieve this by introducing a new regularized determinantal point process (R-DPP), which serves as an intermediate distribution in the sampling procedure by reducing the number of rows from $n$ to $\text{poly}(d)$. Crucially, this intermediate distribution does not distort the probabilities of the target sample. Our key novelty in defining the R-DPP is the use of a Poisson random variable for controlling the probabilities of different subset sizes, leading to new determinantal formulas such as the normalization constant for this distribution. Our algorithm has applications in many diverse areas where determinantal point processes have been used, such as machine learning, stochastic optimization, data summarization and low-rank matrix reconstruction.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

Minimax experimental design: Bridging the gap between statistical and worst-case approaches to least squares regression

In experimental design, we are given a large collection of vectors, each with a hidden response value that we assume derives from an underlying linear model, and we wish to pick a small subset of the vectors such that querying the corresponding responses will lead to a good estimator of the model. A classical approach in statistics is to assume the responses are linear, plus zero-mean i.i.d. Gaussian noise, in which case the goal is to provide an unbiased estimator with smallest mean squared error (A-optimal design). A related approach, more common in computer science, is to assume the responses are arbitrary but fixed, in which case the goal is to estimate the least squares solution using few responses, as quickly as possible, for worst-case inputs. Despite many attempts, characterizing the relationship between these two approaches has proven elusive. We address this by proposing a framework for experimental design where the responses are produced by an arbitrary unknown distribution. We show that there is an efficient randomized experimental design procedure that achieves strong variance bounds for an unbiased estimator using few responses in this general model. Nearly tight bounds for the classical A-optimality criterion, as well as improved bounds for worst-case responses, emerge as special cases of this result. In the process, we develop a new algorithm for a joint sampling distribution called volume sampling, and we propose a new i.i.d. importance sampling method: inverse score sampling. A key novelty of our analysis is in developing new expected error bounds for worst-case regression by controlling the tail behavior of i.i.d. sampling via the jointness of volume sampling. Our result motivates a new minimax-optimality criterion for experimental design which can be viewed as an extension of both A-optimal design and sampling for worst-case regression.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Correcting the bias in least squares regression with volume-rescaled sampling

Consider linear regression where the examples are generated by an unknown distribution on $R^d\times R$. Without any assumptions on the noise, the linear least squares solution for any i.i.d. sample will typically be biased w.r.t. the least squares optimum over the entire distribution. However, we show that if an i.i.d. sample of any size k is augmented by a certain small additional sample, then the solution of the combined sample becomes unbiased. We show this when the additional sample consists of d points drawn jointly according to the input distribution that is rescaled by the squared volume spanned by the points. Furthermore, we propose algorithms to sample from this volume-rescaled distribution when the data distribution is only known through an i.i.d sample.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Leveraged volume sampling for linear regression

Suppose an $n \times d$ design matrix in a linear regression problem is given, but the response for each point is hidden unless explicitly requested. The goal is to sample only a small number $k \ll n$ of the responses, and then produce a weight vector whose sum of squares loss over all points is at most $1+ε$ times the minimum. When $k$ is very small (e.g., $k=d$), jointly sampling diverse subsets of points is crucial. One such method called volume sampling has a unique and desirable property that the weight vector it produces is an unbiased estimate of the optimum. It is therefore natural to ask if this method offers the optimal unbiased estimate in terms of the number of responses $k$ needed to achieve a $1+ε$ loss approximation. Surprisingly we show that volume sampling can have poor behavior when we require a very accurate approximation -- indeed worse than some i.i.d. sampling techniques whose estimates are biased, such as leverage score sampling. We then develop a new rescaled variant of volume sampling that produces an unbiased estimate which avoids this bad behavior and has at least as good a tail bound as leverage score sampling: sample size $k=O(d\log d + d/ε)$ suffices to guarantee total loss at most $1+ε$ times the minimum with high probability. Thus, we improve on the best previously known sample size for an unbiased estimator, $k=O(d^2/ε)$. Our rescaling procedure leads to a new efficient algorithm for volume sampling which is based on a determinantal rejection sampling technique with potentially broader applications to determinantal point processes. Other contributions include introducing the combinatorics needed for rescaled volume sampling and developing tail bounds for sums of dependent random matrices which arise in the process.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Reverse iterative volume sampling for linear regression

We study the following basic machine learning task: Given a fixed set of $d$-dimensional input points for a linear regression problem, we wish to predict a hidden response value for each of the points. We can only afford to attain the responses for a small subset of the points that are then used to construct linear predictions for all points in the dataset. The performance of the predictions is evaluated by the total square loss on all responses (the attained as well as the hidden ones). We show that a good approximate solution to this least squares problem can be obtained from just dimension $d$ many responses by using a joint sampling technique called volume sampling. Moreover, the least squares solution obtained for the volume sampled subproblem is an unbiased estimator of optimal solution based on all n responses. This unbiasedness is a desirable property that is not shared by other common subset selection techniques. Motivated by these basic properties, we develop a theoretical framework for studying volume sampling, resulting in a number of new matrix expectation equalities and statistical guarantees which are of importance not only to least squares regression but also to numerical linear algebra in general. Our methods also lead to a regularized variant of volume sampling, and we propose the first efficient algorithms for volume sampling which make this technique a practical tool in the machine learning toolbox. Finally, we provide experimental evidence which confirms our theoretical findings.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Unbiased estimates for linear regression via volume sampling

Given a full rank matrix $X$ with more columns than rows, consider the task of estimating the pseudo inverse $X^+$ based on the pseudo inverse of a sampled subset of columns (of size at least the number of rows). We show that this is possible if the subset of columns is chosen proportional to the squared volume spanned by the rows of the chosen submatrix (ie, volume sampling). The resulting estimator is unbiased and surprisingly the covariance of the estimator also has a closed form: It equals a specific factor times $X^{+\top}X^+$. Pseudo inverse plays an important part in solving the linear least squares problem, where we try to predict a label for each column of $X$. We assume labels are expensive and we are only given the labels for the small subset of columns we sample from $X$. Using our methods we show that the weight vector of the solution for the sub problem is an unbiased estimator of the optimal solution for the whole problem based on all column labels. We believe that these new formulas establish a fundamental connection between linear least squares and volume sampling. We use our methods to obtain an algorithm for volume sampling that is faster than state-of-the-art and for obtaining bounds for the total loss of the estimated least-squares solution on all labeled columns.

cs.LG↗