Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Michael A. Henning

Publications and source records attributed to Michael A. Henning.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
arXiv2017

Algorithmic Aspects of Semitotal Domination in Graphs

For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a set $D \subseteq V$ is called a semitotal dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and every vertex in $D$ is within distance~$2$ of another vertex of~$D$. The \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem is to find a semitotal dominating set of minimum cardinality. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, the \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} problem is to decide whether $G$ has a semitotal dominating set of cardinality at most $k$. The \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} problem is known to be NP-complete for general graphs. In this paper, we show that the \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} problem remains NP-complete for planar graphs, split graphs and chordal bipartite graphs. We give a polynomial time algorithm to solve the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem in interval graphs. We show that the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem in a graph with maximum degree~$Δ$ admits an approximation algorithm that achieves the approximation ratio of $2+3\ln(Δ+1)$, showing that the problem is in the class log-APX. We also show that the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem cannot be approximated within $(1 - ε)\ln |V| $ for any $ε> 0$ unless NP $\subseteq$ DTIME $(|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)})$. Finally, we prove that the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree $4$.

cs.DM↗
arXiv2017

On accurate domination in graphs

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a subset $D \subseteq V_G$ such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. The cardinality of a smallest dominating set of $G$, denoted by $γ(G)$, is the domination number of $G$. The accurate domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{\rm a}(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest set $D$ that is a dominating set of $G$ and no $|D|$-element subset of $V_G \setminus D$ is a dominating set of $G$. We study graphs for which the accurate domination number is equal to the domination number. In particular, all trees $G$ for which $γ_{\rm a}(G) = γ(G)$ are characterized. Furthermore, we compare the accurate domination number with the domination number of different coronas of a graph.

math.CO↗
arXiv2017

Game Total Domination Critical Graphs

In the total domination game played on a graph $G$, players Dominator and Staller alternately select vertices of $G$, as long as possible, such that each vertex chosen increases the number of vertices totally dominated. Dominator (Staller) wishes to minimize (maximize) the number of vertices selected. The game total domination number, $γ_{\rm tg}(G)$, of $G$ is the number of vertices chosen when Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally. If a vertex $v$ of $G$ is declared to be already totally dominated, then we denote this graph by $G|v$. In this paper the total domination game critical graphs are introduced as the graphs $G$ for which $γ_{\rm tg}(G|v) < γ_{\rm tg}(G)$ holds for every vertex $v$ in $G$. If $γ_{\rm tg}(G) = k$, then $G$ is called $k$-$γ_{\rm tg}$-critical. It is proved that the cycle $C_n$ is $γ_{\rm tg}$-critical if and only if $n\pmod 6 \in \{0,1,3\}$ and that the path $P_n$ is $γ_{\rm tg}$-critical if and only if $n\pmod 6\in \{2,4\}$. $2$-$γ_{\rm tg}$-critical and $3$-$γ_{\rm tg}$-critical graphs are also characterized as well as $3$-$γ_{\rm tg}$-critical joins of graphs.

math.CO↗
arXiv2017

On the Total Forcing Number of a Graph

Let $G$ be a simple and finite graph without isolated vertices. In this paper we study forcing sets (zero forcing sets) which induce a subgraph of $G$ without isolated vertices. Such a set is called a total forcing set, introduced and first studied by Davila \cite{Davila}. The minimum cardinality of a total forcing set in $G$ is the total forcing number of $G$, denoted $F_t(G)$. We study basic properties of $F_t(G)$, relate $F_t(G)$ to various domination parameters, and establish $NP$-completeness of the associated decision problem for $F_t(G)$. We also prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n \ge 3$ and maximum degree $Δ$, then $F_t(G) \le ( \fracΔ{Δ+1} ) n$, with equality if and only if $G$ is a complete graph $K_{Δ+ 1}$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2017

A characterization of trees with equal 2-domination and 2-independence numbers

A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a $2$-dominating set if every vertex of $G$ not in $S$ is adjacent to at least two vertices in $S$, and $S$ is a $2$-independent set if every vertex in $S$ is adjacent to at most one vertex of $S$. The $2$-domination number $γ_2(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a $2$-dominating set in $G$, and the $2$-independence number $α_2(G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a $2$-independent set in $G$. Chellali and Meddah [{\it Trees with equal $2$-domination and $2$-independence numbers,} Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 32 (2012), 263--270] provided a constructive characterization of trees with equal $2$-domination and $2$-independence numbers. Their characterization is in terms of global properties of a tree, and involves properties of minimum $2$-dominating and maximum $2$-independent sets in the tree at each stage of the construction. We provide a constructive characterization that relies only on local properties of the tree at each stage of the construction.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Thoroughly Distributed Colorings

We consider (not necessarily proper) colorings of the vertices of a graph where every color is thoroughly distributed, that is, appears in every open neighborhood. Equivalently, every color is a total dominating set. We define $\td(G)$ as the maximum number of colors in such a coloring and $\FTD(G)$ as the fractional version thereof. In particular, we show that every claw-free graph with minimum degree at least~$2$ has~$\FTD(G)\ge 3/2$ and this is best possible. For planar graphs, we show that every triangular disc has $\FTD(G) \ge 3/2$ and this is best possible, and that every planar graph has $\td(G) \le 4$ and this is best possible, while we conjecture that every planar triangulation has $\td(G)\ge 2$. Further, although there are arbitrarily large examples of connected, cubic graphs with $\td(G)=1$, we show that for a connected cubic graph $\FTD(G) \ge 2-o(1)$, and conjecture that it is always at least~$2$. We also consider the related concepts in hypergraphs.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Trees with Equal Total Domination and Game Total Domination Numbers

In this paper, we continue the study of the total domination game in graphs introduced in [Graphs Combin. 31(5) (2015), 1453--1462], where the players Dominator and Staller alternately select vertices of $G$. Each vertex chosen must strictly increase the number of vertices totally dominated, where a vertex totally dominates another vertex if they are neighbors. This process eventually produces a total dominating set $S$ of $G$ in which every vertex is totally dominated by a vertex in $S$. Dominator wishes to minimize the number of vertices chosen, while Staller wishes to maximize it. The game total domination number, $γ_{\rm tg}(G)$, (respectively, Staller-start game total domination number, $γ_{\rm tg}'(G)$) of $G$ is the number of vertices chosen when Dominator (respectively, Staller) starts the game and both players play optimally. For general graphs $G$, sometimes $γ_{\rm tg}(G) > γ_{\rm tg}'(G)$. We show that if $G$ is a forest with no isolated vertex, then $γ_{\rm tg}(G) \le γ_{\rm tg}'(G)$. Using this result, we characterize the trees with equal total domination and game total domination number.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Location-domination in line graphs

A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is locating if every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$, where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. If $D$ is also a dominating set (total dominating set), it is called a locating-dominating set (respectively, locating-total dominating set) of $G$. A graph $G$ is twin-free if every two distinct vertices of $G$ have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonzalez and A. Marquez, The difference between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] and [F. Foucaud and M. A. Henning. Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 23 (2016), P3.9] respectively, that any twin-free graph $G$ without isolated vertices has a locating-dominating set of size at most one-half its order and a locating-total dominating set of size at most two-thirds its order. In this paper, we prove these two conjectures for the class of line graphs. Both bounds are tight for this class, in the sense that there are infinitely many connected line graphs for which equality holds in the bounds.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

(Total) Domination in Prisms

With the aid of hypergraph transversals it is proved that $γ_t(Q_{n+1}) = 2γ(Q_n)$, where $γ_t(G)$ and $γ(G)$ denote the total domination number and the domination number of $G$, respectively, and $Q_n$ is the $n$-dimensional hypercube. More generally, it is shown that if $G$ is a bipartite graph, then $γ_t(G \square K_2) = 2γ(G)$. Further, we show that the bipartite condition is essential by constructing, for any $k \ge 1$, a (non-bipartite) graph $G$ such that $γ_t (G \square K_2 ) = 2γ(G) - k$. Along the way several domination-type identities for hypercubes are also obtained.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture

A total dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $D$. A locating-total dominating set of $G$ is a total dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-total domination number of $G$, denoted $LT(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in $G$. It is well-known that every connected graph of order $n \geq 3$ has a total dominating set of size at most $\frac{2}{3}n$. We conjecture that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ with no isolated vertex, then $LT(G) \leq \frac{2}{3}n$. We prove the conjecture for graphs without $4$-cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$, then $LT(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Relating Domination, Exponential Domination, and Porous Exponential Domination

The domination number $γ(G)$ of a graph $G$, its exponential domination number $γ_e(G)$, and its porous exponential domination number $γ_e^*(G)$ satisfy $γ_e^*(G)\leq γ_e(G)\leq γ(G)$. We contribute results about the gaps in these inequalities as well as the graphs for which some of the inequalities hold with equality. Relaxing the natural integer linear program whose optimum value is $γ_e^*(G)$, we are led to the definition of the fractional porous exponential domination number $γ_{e,f}^*(G)$ of a graph $G$. For a subcubic tree $T$ of order $n$, we show $γ_{e,f}^*(T)=\frac{n+2}{6}$ and $γ_e(T)\leq 2γ_{e,f}^*(T)$. We characterize the two classes of subcubic trees $T$ with $γ_e(T)=γ_{e,f}^*(T)$ and $γ(T)=γ_e(T)$, respectively. Using linear programming arguments, we establish several lower bounds on the fractional porous exponential domination number in more general settings.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Tight lower bounds on the matching number in a graph with given maximum degree

Let $k \geq 3$. We prove the following three bounds for the matching number, $α'(G)$, of a graph, $G$, of order $n$ size $m$ and maximum degree at most $k$. If $k$ is odd, then $α'(G) \ge \left( \frac{k-1}{k(k^2 - 3)} \right) n \, + \, \left( \frac{k^2 - k - 2}{k(k^2 - 3)} \right) m \, - \, \frac{k-1}{k(k^2 - 3)}$. If $k$ is even, then $α'(G) \ge \frac{n}{k(k+1)} \, + \, \frac{m}{k+1} - \frac{1}{k}$. If $k$ is even, then $α'(G) \ge \left( \frac{k+2}{k^2+k+2} \right) m \, - \, \left( \frac{k-2}{k^2+k+2} \right) n \, - \frac{k+2}{k^2+k+2}$. In this paper we actually prove a slight strengthening of the above for which the bounds are tight for essentially all densities of graphs. The above three bounds are in fact powerful enough to give a complete description of the set $L_k$ of pairs $(γ,β)$ of real numbers with the following property. There exists a constant $K$ such that $α'(G) \geq γn + βm - K$ for every connected graph $G$ with maximum degree at most~$k$, where $n$ and $m$ denote the number of vertices and the number of edges, respectively, in $G$. We show that $L_k$ is a convex set. Further, if $k$ is odd, then $L_k$ is the intersection of two closed half-spaces, and there is exactly one extreme point of $L_k$, while if $k$ is even, then $L_k$ is the intersection of three closed half-spaces, and there are precisely two extreme points of $L_k$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Total Dominating Sequences in Graphs

A vertex in a graph totally dominates another vertex if they are adjacent. A sequence of vertices in a graph $G$ is called a total dominating sequence if every vertex $v$ in the sequence totally dominates at least one vertex that was not totally dominated by any vertex that precedes $v$ in the sequence, and at the end all vertices of $G$ are totally dominated. While the length of a shortest such sequence is the total domination number of $G$, in this paper we investigate total dominating sequences of maximum length, which we call the Grundy total domination number, $γ_{\rm gr}^t(G)$, of $G$. We provide a characterization of the graphs $G$ for which $γ_{\rm gr}^t(G)=|V(G)|$ and of those for which $γ_{\rm gr}^t(G)=2$. We show that if $T$ is a nontrivial tree of order~$n$ with no vertex with two or more leaf-neighbors, then $γ_{\rm gr}^t(T) \ge \frac{2}{3}(n+1)$, and characterize the extremal trees. We also prove that for $k \ge 3$, if $G$ is a connected $k$-regular graph of order~$n$ different from $K_{k,k}$, then $γ_{\rm gr}^t(G) \ge (n + \lceil \frac{k}{2} \rceil - 2)/(k-1)$ if $G$ is not bipartite and $γ_{\rm gr}^t(G) \ge (n + 2\lceil \frac{k}{2} \rceil - 4)/(k-1)$ if $G$ is bipartite. The Grundy total domination number is proven to be bounded from above by two times the Grundy domination number, while the former invariant can be arbitrarily smaller than the latter. Finally, a natural connection with edge covering sequences in hypergraphs is established, which in particular yields the NP-completeness of the decision version of the Grundy total domination number.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Bounds on the Game Transversal Number in Hypergraphs

Let $H = (V,E)$ be a hypergraph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$ of order $\nH = |V|$ and size $\mH = |E|$. A transversal in $H$ is a subset of vertices in $H$ that has a nonempty intersection with every edge of $H$. A vertex hits an edge if it belongs to that edge. The transversal game played on $H$ involves of two players, \emph{Edge-hitter} and \emph{Staller}, who take turns choosing a vertex from $H$. Each vertex chosen must hit at least one edge not hit by the vertices previously chosen. The game ends when the set of vertices chosen becomes a transversal in $H$. Edge-hitter wishes to minimize the number of vertices chosen in the game, while Staller wishes to maximize it. The \emph{game transversal number}, $τ_g(H)$, of $H$ is the number of vertices chosen when Edge-hitter starts the game and both players play optimally. We compare the game transversal number of a hypergraph with its transversal number, and also present an important fact concerning the monotonicity of $τ_g$, that we call the Transversal Continuation Principle. It is known that if $H$ is a hypergraph with all edges of size at least~$2$, and $H$ is not a $4$-cycle, then $τ_g(H) \le \frac{4}{11}(\nH+\mH)$; and if $H$ is a (loopless) graph, then $τ_g(H) \le \frac{1}{3}(\nH + \mH + 1)$. We prove that if $H$ is a $3$-uniform hypergraph, then $τ_g(H) \le \frac{5}{16}(\nH + \mH)$, and if $H$ is $4$-uniform, then $τ_g(H) \le \frac{71}{252}(\nH + \mH)$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2016

Location-domination and matching in cubic graphs

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex outside $D$ is adjacent to a vertex in $D$. A locating-dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted $γ_L(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in $G$. Garijo, Gonzalez and Marquez [Applied Math. Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] posed the conjecture that for $n$ sufficiently large, the maximum value of the location-domination number of a twin-free, connected graph on $n$ vertices is equal to $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor$. We propose the related (stronger) conjecture that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ without isolated vertices, then $γ_L(G)\leq \frac{n}{2}$. We prove the conjecture for cubic graphs. We rely heavily on proof techniques from matching theory to prove our result.

math.CO↗
arXiv2015

Progress Towards the Total Domination Game $\frac{3}{4}$-Conjecture

In this paper, we continue the study of the total domination game in graphs introduced in [Graphs Combin. 31(5) (2015), 1453--1462], where the players Dominator and Staller alternately select vertices of $G$. Each vertex chosen must strictly increase the number of vertices totally dominated, where a vertex totally dominates another vertex if they are neighbors. This process eventually produces a total dominating set $S$ of $G$ in which every vertex is totally dominated by a vertex in $S$. Dominator wishes to minimize the number of vertices chosen, while Staller wishes to maximize it. The game total domination number, $γ_{\rm tg}(G)$, of $G$ is the number of vertices chosen when Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally. Henning, Klavžar and Rall [Combinatorica, to appear] posted the $\frac{3}{4}$-Game Total Domination Conjecture that states that if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices in which every component contains at least three vertices, then $γ_{\rm tg}(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n$. In this paper, we prove this conjecture over the class of graphs $G$ that satisfy both the condition that the degree sum of adjacent vertices in $G$ is at least $4$ and the condition that no two vertices of degree $1$ are at distance $4$ apart in $G$. In particular, we prove that by adopting a greedy strategy, Dominator can complete the total domination game played in a graph with minimum degree at least $2$ in at most $3n/4$ moves.

math.CO↗
arXiv2015

Locating-dominating sets in twin-free graphs

A locating-dominating set of a graph $G$ is a dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted $γ_L(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in $G$. It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. González and A. Márquez. The difference between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ without isolated vertices, then $γ_L(G)\le \frac{n}{2}$. We prove the general bound $γ_L(G)\le \frac{2n}{3}$, slightly improving over the $\lfloor\frac{2n}{3}\rfloor+1$ bound of Garijo et al. We then provide constructions of graphs reaching the $\frac{n}{2}$ bound, showing that if the conjecture is true, the family of extremal graphs is a very rich one. Moreover, we characterize the trees $G$ that are extremal for this bound. We finally prove the conjecture for split graphs and co-bipartite graphs.

math.CO↗