Michael Fairley | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

TreeDGS: Aerial Gaussian Splatting for Distant DBH Measurement

Aerial remote sensing efficiently surveys large areas, but accurate direct object-level measurement remains difficult in complex natural scenes. Advancements in 3D computer vision, particularly radiance field representations such as NeRF and 3D Gaussian splatting, can improve reconstruction fidelity from posed imagery. Nevertheless, direct aerial measurement of important attributes like tree diameter at breast height (DBH) remains challenging. Trunks in aerial forest scans are distant and sparsely observed in image views; at typical operating altitudes, stems may span only a few pixels. With these constraints, conventional reconstruction methods have inaccurate breast-height trunk geometry. TreeDGS is an aerial image reconstruction method that uses 3D Gaussian splatting as a continuous scene representation for trunk measurement. After SfM--MVS initialization and Gaussian optimization, we extract a dense point set from the Gaussian field using RaDe-GS's depth-aware cumulative-opacity integration and associate each sample with a multi-view opacity reliability score. Then, we isolate trunk points and estimate DBH using opacity-weighted solid-circle fitting. Evaluated on 10 plots with field-measured DBH, TreeDGS reaches 4.79 cm RMSE (about 2.6 pixels at this GSD) and outperforms a LiDAR baseline (7.66 cm RMSE). This shows that TreeDGS can enable accurate, low-cost aerial DBH measurement .

cs.CV↗

arXiv2019

Computing the Expected Value of Sample Information Efficiently: Expertise and Skills Required for Four Model-Based Methods

Objectives: Value of information (VOI) analyses can help policy-makers make informed decisions about whether to conduct and how to design future studies. Historically, a computationally expensive method to compute the Expected Value of Sample Information (EVSI) restricted the use of VOI to simple decision models and study designs. Recently, four EVSI approximation methods have made such analyses more feasible and accessible. We provide practical recommendations for analysts computing EVSI by evaluating these novel methods. Methods: Members of the Collaborative Network for Value of Information (ConVOI) compared the inputs, analyst's expertise and skills, and software required for four recently developed approximation methods. Information was also collected on the strengths and limitations of each approximation method. Results: All four EVSI methods require a decision-analytic model's probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) output. One of the methods also requires the model to be re-run to obtain new PSA outputs for each EVSI estimation. To compute EVSI, analysts must be familiar with at least one of the following skills: advanced regression modeling, likelihood specification, and Bayesian modeling. All methods have different strengths and limitations, e.g., some methods handle evaluation of study designs with more outcomes more efficiently while others quantify uncertainty in EVSI estimates. All methods are programmed in the statistical language R and two of the methods provide online applications. Conclusion: Our paper helps to inform the choice between four efficient EVSI estimation methods, enabling analysts to assess the methods' strengths and limitations and select the most appropriate EVSI method given their situation and skills.

stat.OT↗