SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Michael Lachmann

Publications and source records attributed to Michael Lachmann.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Improving Outbreak Forecasts Through Model Augmentation

Accurate forecasts of disease outbreaks are critical for effective public health responses, management of healthcare surge capacity, and communication of public risk. There are a growing number of powerful forecasting methods that fall into two broad categories -- empirical models that extrapolate from historical data, and mechanistic models based on fixed epidemiological assumptions. However, these methods often underperform precisely when reliable predictions are most urgently needed -- during periods of rapid epidemic escalation. Here, we introduce epimodulation, a hybrid approach that integrates fundamental epidemiological principles into existing predictive models to enhance forecasting accuracy, especially around epidemic peaks. When applied to simple empirical forecasting methods (ARIMA, Holt--Winters, and spline models), epimodulation improved overall prediction accuracy by an average of 9.1\% (range: 8.2--12.5\%) for COVID-19 hospital admissions and by 19.5\% (range: 17.6--23.2\%) for influenza hospital admissions; accuracy during epidemic peaks improved even further, by an average of 20.7\% and 25.4\%, respectively. Epimodulation also substantially enhanced the performance of complex forecasting methods, including the COVID-19 Forecast Hub ensemble model, demonstrating its broad utility in improving forecast reliability at critical moments in disease outbreaks.

stat.AP

Assembly Theory and its Relationship with Computational Complexity

Assembly theory (AT) quantifies selection using the assembly equation and identifies complex objects that occur in abundance based on two measurements, assembly index and copy number, where the assembly index is the minimum number of joining operations necessary to construct an object from basic parts, and the copy number is how many instances of the given object(s) are observed. Together these define a quantity, called Assembly, which captures the amount of causation required to produce objects in abundance in an observed sample. This contrasts with the random generation of objects. Herein we describe how AT's focus on selection as the mechanism for generating complexity offers a distinct approach, and answers different questions, than computational complexity theory with its focus on minimum descriptions via compressibility. To explore formal differences between the two approaches, we show several simple and explicit mathematical examples demonstrating that the assembly index, itself only one piece of the theoretical framework of AT, is formally not equivalent to other commonly used complexity measures from computer science and information theory including Shannon entropy, Huffman encoding, and Lempel-Ziv-Welch compression. We also include proofs that assembly index is not in the same computational complexity class as these compression algorithms and discuss fundamental differences in the ontological basis of AT, and assembly index as a physical observable, which distinguish it from theoretical approaches to formalizing life that are unmoored from measurement.

cs.CC

Assembly Theory Explains and Quantifies the Emergence of Selection and Evolution

Since the time of Darwin, scientists have struggled to reconcile the evolution of biological forms in a universe determined by fixed laws. These laws underpin the origin of life, evolution, human culture and technology, as set by the boundary conditions of the universe, however these laws cannot predict the emergence of these things. By contrast evolutionary theory works in the opposite direction, indicating how selection can explain why some things exist and not others. To understand how open-ended forms can emerge in a forward-process from physics that does not include their design, a new approach to understand the non-biological to biological transition is necessary. Herein, we present a new theory, Assembly Theory (AT), which explains and quantifies the emergence of selection and evolution. In AT, the complexity of an individual observable object is measured by its Assembly Index (a), defined as the minimal number of steps needed to construct the object from basic building blocks. Combining a with the copy number defines a new quantity called Assembly which quantifies the amount of selection required to produce a given ensemble of objects. We investigate the internal structure and properties of assembly space and quantify the dynamics of undirected exploratory processes as compared to the directed processes that emerge from selection. The implementation of assembly theory allows the emergence of selection in physical systems to be quantified at any scale as the transition from undirected-discovery dynamics to a selected process within the assembly space. This yields a mechanism for the onset of selection and evolution and a formal approach to defining life. Because the assembly of an object is easily calculable and measurable it is possible to quantify a lower limit on the amount of selection and memory required to produce complexity uniquely linked to biology in the universe.

physics.bio-ph

The fitness value of information

Biologists measure information in different ways. Neurobiologists and researchers in bioinformatics often measure information using information-theoretic measures such as Shannon's entropy or mutual information. Behavioral biologists and evolutionary ecologists more commonly use decision-theoretic measures, such the value of information, which assess the worth of information to a decision maker. Here we show that these two kinds of measures are intimately related in the context of biological evolution. We present a simple model of evolution in an uncertain environment, and calculate the increase in Darwinian fitness that is made possible by information about the environmental state. This fitness increase -- the fitness value of information -- is a composite of both Shannon's mutual information and the decision-theoretic value of information. Furthermore, we show that in certain cases the fitness value of responding to a cue is exactly equal to the mutual information between the cue and the environment. In general the Shannon entropy of the environment, which seemingly fails to take anything about organismal fitness into account, nonetheless imposes an upper bound on the fitness value of information.

q-bio.PE

Who Wins Domineering on Rectangular Boards?

Using mostly elementary considerations, we find out who wins the game of Domineering on all rectangular boards of width 2, 3, 5, and 7. We obtain bounds on other boards as well, and prove the existence of polynomial-time strategies for playing on all boards of width 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 11. We also comment briefly on toroidal and cylindrical boards.

math.CO

The physical limits of communication

It has been well-known since the pioneering work of Claude Shannon in the 1940s that a message transmitted with optimal efficiency over a channel of limited bandwidth is indistinguishable from random noise to a receiver who is unfamiliar with the language in which the message is written. In this letter we demonstrate an equivalent result about electromagnetic transmissions. We show that when electromagnetic radiation is used as the transmission medium, the most information-efficient format for a given message is indistinguishable from black-body radiation to a receiver who is unfamiliar with that format. The characteristic temperature of the radiation is set by the amount of energy used to make the transmission. If information is not encoded in the direction of the radiation, but only its timing, energy or polarization, then the most efficient format has the form of a one-dimensional black-body spectrum which is easily distinguished from the three-dimensional case.

cond-mat.stat-mech