Can Bayes Factors "Prove" the Null Hypothesis?
It is possible to obtain a large Bayes Factor (BF) favoring the null hypothesis when both the null and alternative hypotheses have low likelihoods, and there are other hypotheses being ignored that are much more strongly supported by the data. As sample sizes become large it becomes increasingly probable that a strong BF favouring a point null against a conventional Bayesian vague alternative co-occurs with a BF favouring various specific alternatives against the null. For any BF threshold q and sample mean, there is a value n such that sample sizes larger than n guarantee that although the BF comparing H0 against a conventional (vague) alternative exceeds q, nevertheless for some range of hypothetical {\mu}, a BF comparing H0 against {\mu} in that range falls below 1/q. This paper discusses the conditions under which this conundrum occurs and investigates methods for resolving it.