arXiv subjects

Michaela Borzechowski

Publications and source records attributed to Michaela Borzechowski.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Splitting Sandwiches Unevenly via Unique Sink Orientations and Rainbow Arrangements

The famous Ham-Sandwich theorem states that any $d$ point sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be simultaneously bisected by a single hyperplane. The $\alpha$-Ham-Sandwich theorem gives a sufficient condition for the existence of biased cuts, i.e., hyperplanes that do not cut off half but some prescribed fraction of each point set. We give two new proofs for this theorem. The first proof is completely combinatorial and highlights a strong connection between the $\alpha$-Ham-Sandwich theorem and Unique Sink Orientations of grids. The second proof uses point-hyperplane duality and the Poincar\'e-Miranda theorem and allows us to generalize the result to and beyond oriented matroids. For this we introduce a new concept of rainbow arrangements, generalizing colored pseudo-hyperplane arrangements. Along the way, we also show that the realizability problem for rainbow arrangements is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete, which also implies that the realizability problem for grid Unique Sink Orientations is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete.

math.CO↗

arXiv2024

On Degeneracy in the P-Matroid Oriented Matroid Complementarity Problem

Klaus showed that the Oriented Matroid Complementarity Problem (OMCP) can be solved by a reduction to the problem of sink-finding in a unique sink orientation (USO) if the input is promised to be given by a non-degenerate extension of a P-matroid. In this paper, we investigate the effect of degeneracy on this reduction. On the one hand, this understanding of degeneracies allows us to prove a linear lower bound on the number of vertex evaluations required for sink-finding in P-matroid USOs, the set of USOs obtainable through Klaus' reduction. On the other hand, it allows us to adjust Klaus' reduction to also work with degenerate instances. Furthermore, we introduce a total search version of the P-Matroid Oriented Matroid Complementarity Problem (P-OMCP). Given any extension of any oriented matroid M, by reduction to a total search version of USO sink-finding we can either solve the OMCP, or provide a polynomial-time verifiable certificate that M is not a P-matroid. This places the total search version of the P-OMCP in the complexity class Unique End of Potential Line (UEOPL).

math.CO↗

arXiv2024

Two Choices are Enough for P-LCPs, USOs, and Colorful Tangents

We provide polynomial-time reductions between three search problems from three distinct areas: the P-matrix linear complementarity problem (P-LCP), finding the sink of a unique sink orientation (USO), and a variant of the $α$-Ham Sandwich problem. For all three settings, we show that "two choices are enough", meaning that the general non-binary version of the problem can be reduced in polynomial time to the binary version. This specifically means that generalized P-LCPs are equivalent to P-LCPs, and grid USOs are equivalent to cube USOs. These results are obtained by showing that both the P-LCP and our $α$-Ham Sandwich variant are equivalent to a new problem we introduce, P-Lin-Bellman. This problem can be seen as a new tool for formulating problems as P-LCPs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

On Phases of Unique Sink Orientations

A unique sink orientation (USO) is an orientation of the $n$-dimensional hypercube graph such that every non-empty face contains a unique sink. Schurr showed that given any $n$-dimensional USO and any dimension $i$, the set of edges $E_i$ in that dimension can be decomposed into equivalence classes (so-called phases), such that flipping the orientation of a subset $S$ of $E_i$ yields another USO if and only if $S$ is a union of a set of these phases. In this paper we prove various results on the structure of phases. Using these results, we show that all phases can be computed in $O(3^n)$ time, significantly improving upon the previously known $O(4^n)$ trivial algorithm. Furthermore, we show that given a boolean circuit of size $poly(n)$ succinctly encoding an $n$-dimensional (acyclic) USO, it is PSPACE-complete to determine whether two given edges are in the same phase. The problem is thus equally difficult as determining whether the hypercube orientation encoded by a given circuit is an acyclic USO [Gärtner and Thomas, STACS'15].

math.CO↗

arXiv2023

An FPT Algorithm for Splitting a Necklace Among Two Thieves

It is well-known that the 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting problem reduces to the discrete Ham Sandwich problem. In fact, this reduction was crucial in the proof of the PPA-completeness of the Ham Sandwich problem [Filos-Ratsikas and Goldberg, STOC'19]. Recently, a variant of the Ham Sandwich problem called $α$-Ham Sandwich has been studied, in which the point sets are guaranteed to be well-separated [Steiger and Zhao, DCG'10]. The complexity of this search problem remains unknown, but it is known to lie in the complexity class UEOPL [Chiu, Choudhary and Mulzer, ICALP'20]. We define the analogue of this well-separability condition in the necklace splitting problem -- a necklace is $n$-separable, if every subset $A$ of the $n$ types of jewels can be separated from the types $[n]\setminus A$ by at most $n$ separator points. By the reduction to the Ham Sandwich problem it follows that this version of necklace splitting has a unique solution. We furthermore provide two FPT algorithms: The first FPT algorithm solves 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting on $(n-1+\ell)$-separable necklaces with $n$ types of jewels and $m$ total jewels in time $2^{O(\ell\log\ell)}+m^2$. In particular, this shows that 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting is polynomial-time solvable on $n$-separable necklaces. Thus, attempts to show hardness of $α$-Ham Sandwich through reduction from the 2-Thief-Necklace-Splitting problem cannot work. The second FPT algorithm tests $(n-1+\ell)$-separability of a given necklace with $n$ types of jewels in time $2^{O(\ell^2)}\cdot n^4$. In particular, $n$-separability can thus be tested in polynomial time, even though testing well-separation of point sets is coNP-complete [Bergold et al., SWAT'22].

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

A Universal Construction for Unique Sink Orientations

Unique Sink Orientations (USOs) of cubes can be used to capture the combinatorial structure of many essential algebraic and geometric problems. For various structural and algorithmic questions, including enumeration of USOs and algorithm analysis, it is crucial to have systematic constructions of USOs. While some construction methods for USOs already exist, each one of them has some significant downside. Most of the construction methods have limited expressivity -- USOs with some desired properties cannot be constructed. In contrast, the phase flips of Schurr can construct all USOs, but the operation is not well understood. We were inspired by techniques from cube tilings of space; we expand upon existing techniques in the area to develop generalized rewriting rules for USOs. These rewriting rules are a new construction framework which can be applied to all USOs. The rewriting rules can generate every USO using only USOs of lower dimension. The effect of any specific rewriting rule on an USO is simple to understand. A special case of our construction produces a new elementary transformation of USOs, which we call a partial swap. We further investigate the relationship between partial swaps and phase flips and generalize partial swaps to phase swaps.

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Unique Sink Orientations of Grids is in Unique End of Potential Line

The complexity classes Unique End of Potential Line (UEOPL) and its promise version PUEOPL were introduced in 2018 by Fearnly et al. UEOPL captures search problems where the instances are promised to have a unique solution. UEOPL captures total search versions of these promise problems. The promise problems can be made total by defining violations that are returned as a short certificate of an unfulfilled promise. GridUSO is the problem of finding the sink in a grid with a unique sink orientation. It was introduced by Gärtner et al. We describe a promise preserving reduction from GridUSO to UniqueForwardEOPL, a UEOPL-complete problem. Thus, we show that GridUSO is in UEOPL and its promise version is in PUEOPL.

cs.CG↗