arXiv subjects

Michal Amir

Publications and source records attributed to Michal Amir.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Simple Lattices in Products of Davis Complexes

Burger and Mozes (1997) constructed the first examples of simple uniform lattices in products of trees. In this paper, we construct simple uniform lattices in products of certain Davis complexes. More precisely, we consider lattices in products of trees and two-dimensional Davis complexes of the right-angled Coxeter group whose defining graph is an odd graph. As part of the proof, we define an analogue of the Burger-Mozes universal groups in this setting, and provide a local criterion for a vertex transitive group to be dense in the universal group.

math.GR↗

arXiv2018

Two Erdős--Hajnal-type Theorems in Hypergraphs

The Erdős--Hajnal Theorem asserts that non-universal graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain an induced copy of some fixed graph $H$, have homogeneous sets of size significantly larger than one can generally expect to find in a graph. We obtain two results of this flavor in the setting of $r$-uniform hypergraphs. A theorem of Rödl asserts that if an $n$-vertex graph is non-universal then it contains an almost homogeneous set (i.e one with edge density either very close to $0$ or $1$) of size $Ω(n)$. We prove that if a $3$-uniform hypergraph is non-universal then it contains an almost homogeneous set of size $Ω(\log n)$. An example of Rödl from 1986 shows that this bound is tight. Let $R_r(t)$ denote the size of the largest non-universal $r$-graph $G$ so that neither $G$ nor its complement contain a complete $r$-partite subgraph with parts of size $t$. We prove an Erdős--Hajnal-type stepping-up lemma, showing how to transform a lower bound for $R_{r}(t)$ into a lower bound for $R_{r+1}(t)$. As an application of this lemma, we improve a bound of Conlon--Fox--Sudakov by showing that $R_3(t) \geq t^{Ω(t)}$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2018

Ramsey-nice families of graphs

For a finite family $\mathcal{F}$ of fixed graphs let $R_k(\mathcal{F})$ be the smallest integer $n$ for which every $k$-coloring of the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ yields a monochromatic copy of some $F\in\mathcal{F}$. We say that $\mathcal{F}$ is $k$-nice if for every graph $G$ with $χ(G)=R_k(\mathcal{F})$ and for every $k$-coloring of $E(G)$ there exists a monochromatic copy of some $F\in\mathcal{F}$. It is easy to see that if $\mathcal{F}$ contains no forest, then it is not $k$-nice for any $k$. It seems plausible to conjecture that a (weak) converse holds, namely, for any finite family of graphs $\mathcal{F}$ that contains at least one forest, and for all $k\geq k_0(\mathcal{F})$ (or at least for infinitely many values of $k$), $\mathcal{F}$ is $k$-nice. We prove several (modest) results in support of this conjecture, showing, in particular, that it holds for each of the three families consisting of two connected graphs with 3 edges each and observing that it holds for any family $\mathcal{F}$ containing a forest with at most 2 edges. We also study some related problems and disprove a conjecture by Aharoni, Charbit and Howard regarding the size of matchings in regular 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs.

math.CO↗