arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Michal Koucký.
Sleator and Tarjan [JACM, 1985] conjectured that splay trees are dynamically optimal -- that on every access sequence, they perform within a constant factor of the optimal offline dynamic binary search tree. Despite four decades of work, no $o(\log n)$ competitive ratio was known. We prove that splay trees are $O(\log\log n \cdot \log^2\log\log n)=\tilde{O}(\log\log n)$-competitive.
Catalytic computing concerns space bounded computation which starts with memory full of data that have to be restored by the end of the computation. Lossy catalytic computing, defined by Gupta et al. (2024) and fully characterized by Folkertsma et al. (ITCS 2025), is the study of allowing a small number of errors when resetting the catalytic tape at the end of a computation. Such a notion is useful when considering the robust use of catalytic techniques in the study of ordinary space-bounded algorithms. To that end however, defining and characterizing less strict notions of error was left open by Folkertsma et al. (ITCS 2025) and other works such as Mertz (B. EATCS, 2023). We expand the definition of possible resetting error in three natural ways: 1. randomized catalytic computation which can completely destroy the catalytic tape with some probability over the randomness 2. randomized catalytic computation which makes a bounded number of errors in expectation over the randomness 3. deterministic catalytic computation which makes a bounded number of errors in expectation over the initial catalytic tape itself We show a near complete characterization of the above models, both in the general case and in the logspace polynomial-time regime, by showing equivalences either between one another, to errorless catalytic space models, or to standard time or space complexity classes. Under a derandomization assumption, we show a near full collapse of all existing catalytic classes in the logspace regime.
A function $φ:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^N$ is called an isometric embedding of the $n$-dimensional Hamming metric space to the $N$-dimensional edit metric space if, for all $x,y\in\{0,1\}^n$, the Hamming distance between $x$ and $y$ is equal to the edit distance between $φ(x)$ and $φ(y)$. The rate of such an embedding is defined as the ratio $n/N$. It is well known in the literature how to construct isometric embeddings with rate $Ω(1/\log n)$. However, achieving even near-isometric embeddings with positive constant rate has remained elusive until now. In this paper, we present an isometric embedding with rate $1/8$ by discovering connections to synchronization strings, which were studied in the context of insertion-deletion codes (Haeupler-Shahrasbi [JACM'21]). At a technical level, we introduce a framework for obtaining high-rate isometric embeddings using a novel object called misaligners. As an immediate consequence of our constant-rate isometric embedding, we improve known conditional lower bounds for various optimization problems in the edit metric, now with optimal dependence on the dimension. We complement our results by showing that no isometric embedding $φ:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^N$ can have rate greater than $15/32$ for all positive integers $n$. En route to proving this upper bound, we uncover fundamental structural properties necessary for every Hamming-to-edit isometric embedding. We also prove similar upper and lower bounds for embeddings over larger alphabets. Finally, we consider embeddings $φ:Σ_{\mathrm{in}}^n \to Σ_{\mathrm{out}}^N$ between different input and output alphabets, where the rate is given by $\frac{n\log|Σ_{\mathrm{in}}|}{N\log|Σ_{\mathrm{out}}|}$. In this setting, we show that the rate can be made arbitrarily close to $1$.
We develop catalytic algorithms for fundamental problems in algorithm design that run in polynomial time, use only $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ workspace, and use sublinear catalytic space matching the best-known space bounds of non-catalytic algorithms running in polynomial time. First, we design a polynomial time algorithm for directed $s$-$t$ connectivity using $n \big/ 2^{Θ(\sqrt{\log n})}$ catalytic space, which matches the state-of-the-art time-space bounds in the non-catalytic setting [Barnes et al., 1998], and improves the catalytic space usage of the best known algorithm [Cook and Pyne, 2026]. Furthermore, using only $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ random bits we get a randomized algorithm whose running time nearly matches the fastest time bounds known for space-unrestricted algorithms. Second, we design polynomial time algorithms for the problems of computing Edit Distance, Longest Common Subsequence, and the Discrete Fréchet Distance, again using $n \big/ 2^{Θ(\sqrt{\log n})}$ catalytic space. This again matches non-catalytic time-space frontier for Edit Distance and Least Common Subsequence [Kiyomi et al., 2021].
A catalytic machine is a space-bounded Turing machine with additional access to a second, much larger work tape, with the caveat that this tape is full, and its contents must be preserved by the computation. Catalytic machines were defined by Buhrman et al. (STOC 2014), who, alongside many follow-up works, exhibited the power of catalytic space ($CSPACE$) and in particular catalytic logspace machines ($CL$) beyond that of traditional space-bounded machines. Several variants of $CL$ have been proposed, including non-deterministic and co-non-deterministic catalytic computation by Buhrman et al. (STACS 2016) and randomized catalytic computation by Datta et al. (CSR 2020). These and other works proposed several questions, such as catalytic analogues of the theorems of Savitch and Immerman and Szelepcsényi. Catalytic computation was recently derandomized by Cook et al. (STOC 2025), but only in certain parameter regimes. We settle almost all questions regarding randomized and non-deterministic catalytic computation, by giving an optimal reduction from catalytic space with additional resources to the corresponding non-catalytic space classes. With regards to non-determinism, our main result is that \[CL=CNL\] and with regards to randomness we show \[CL=CPrL\] where $CPrL$ denotes randomized catalytic logspace where the accepting probability can be arbitrarily close to $1/2$. We also have a number of near-optimal partial results for non-deterministic and randomized catalytic computation with less catalytic space. We show catalytic versions of Savitch's theorem, Immerman-Szelepscényi, and the derandomization results of Nisan and Saks and Zhou, all of which are unconditional and hold for all parameter settings. Our results build on the compress-or-compute framework of Cook et al. (STOC 2025). Despite proving broader and stronger results, our framework is simpler and more modular.
Several measures exist for string similarity, including notable ones like the edit distance and the indel distance. The former measures the count of insertions, deletions, and substitutions required to transform one string into another, while the latter specifically quantifies the number of insertions and deletions. Many algorithmic solutions explicitly address one of these measures, and frequently techniques applicable to one can also be adapted to work with the other. In this paper, we investigate whether there exists a standardized approach for applying results from one setting to another. Specifically, we demonstrate the capability to reduce questions regarding string similarity over arbitrary alphabets to equivalent questions over a binary alphabet. Furthermore, we illustrate how to transform questions concerning indel distance into equivalent questions based on edit distance. This complements an earlier result of Tiskin (2007) which addresses the inverse direction.
In this paper we consider sorting in the cache-oblivious model of Frigo, Leiserson, Prokop, and Ramachandran (1999). We introduce a new simple sorting algorithm in that model which has asymptotically optimal IO complexity $O(\frac{n}{B} \log_{M/B} n)$, where $n$ is the instance size, $M$ size of the cache and $B$ size of a memory block. This is the same as the complexity of the best known cache-oblivious sorting algorithm FunnelSort.
Edit distance is an important measure of string similarity. It counts the number of insertions, deletions and substitutions one has to make to a string $x$ to get a string $y$. In this paper we design an almost linear-size sketching scheme for computing edit distance up to a given threshold $k$. The scheme consists of two algorithms, a sketching algorithm and a recovery algorithm. The sketching algorithm depends on the parameter $k$ and takes as input a string $x$ and a public random string $ρ$ and computes a sketch $sk_ρ(x;k)$, which is a digested version of $x$. The recovery algorithm is given two sketches $sk_ρ(x;k)$ and $sk_ρ(y;k)$ as well as the public random string $ρ$ used to create the two sketches, and (with high probability) if the edit distance $ED(x,y)$ between $x$ and $y$ is at most $k$, will output $ED(x,y)$ together with an optimal sequence of edit operations that transforms $x$ to $y$, and if $ED(x,y) > k$ will output LARGE. The size of the sketch output by the sketching algorithm on input $x$ is $k{2^{O(\sqrt{\log(n)\log\log(n)})}}$ (where $n$ is an upper bound on length of $x$). The sketching and recovery algorithms both run in time polynomial in $n$. The dependence of sketch size on $k$ is information theoretically optimal and improves over the quadratic dependence on $k$ in schemes of Kociumaka, Porat and Starikovskaya (FOCS'2021), and Bhattacharya and Koucký (STOC'2023).
The list-labeling problem captures the basic task of storing a dynamically changing set of up to $n$ elements in sorted order in an array of size $m = (1 + Θ(1))n$. The goal is to support insertions and deletions while moving around elements within the array as little as possible. Until recently, the best known upper bound stood at $O(\log^2 n)$ amortized cost. This bound, which was first established in 1981, was finally improved two years ago, when a randomized $O(\log^{3/2} n)$ expected-cost algorithm was discovered. The best randomized lower bound for this problem remains $Ω(\log n)$, and closing this gap is considered to be a major open problem in data structures. In this paper, we present the See-Saw Algorithm, a randomized list-labeling solution that achieves a nearly optimal bound of $O(\log n \operatorname{polyloglog} n)$ amortized expected cost. This bound is achieved despite at least three lower bounds showing that this type of result is impossible for large classes of solutions.
In this paper we provide a new locally consistent decomposition of strings. Each string $x$ is decomposed into blocks that can be described by grammars of size $\widetilde{O}(k)$ (using some amount of randomness). If we take two strings $x$ and $y$ of edit distance at most $k$ then their block decomposition uses the same number of grammars and the $i$-th grammar of $x$ is the same as the $i$-th grammar of $y$ except for at most $k$ indexes $i$. The edit distance of $x$ and $y$ equals to the sum of edit distances of pairs of blocks where $x$ and $y$ differ. Our decomposition can be used to design a sketch of size $\widetilde{O}(k^2)$ for edit distance, and also a rolling sketch for edit distance of size $\widetilde{O}(k^2)$. The rolling sketch allows to update the sketched string by appending a symbol or removing a symbol from the beginning of the string.
In this paper we give an algorithm for streaming $k$-edit approximate pattern matching which uses space $\widetilde{O}(k^2)$ and time $\widetilde{O}(k^2)$ per arriving symbol. This improves substantially on the recent algorithm of Kociumaka, Porat and Starikovskaya (2022) which uses space $\widetilde{O}(k^5)$ and time $\widetilde{O}(k^8)$ per arriving symbol. In the $k$-edit approximate pattern matching problem we get a pattern $P$ and text $T$ and we want to identify all substrings of the text $T$ that are at edit distance at most $k$ from $P$. In the streaming version of this problem both the pattern and the text arrive in a streaming fashion symbol by symbol and after each symbol of the text we need to report whether there is a current suffix of the text with edit distance at most $k$ from $P$. We measure the total space needed by the algorithm and time needed per arriving symbol.
We show that for every $r \ge 2$ there exists $ε_r > 0$ such that any $r$-uniform hypergraph with $m$ edges and maximum vertex degree $o(\sqrt{m})$ contains a set of at most $(\frac{1}{2} - ε_r)m$ edges the removal of which breaks the hypergraph into connected components with at most $m/2$ edges. We use this to give an algorithm running in time $d^{(1 - ε_r)m}$ that decides satisfiability of $m$-variable $(d, k)$-CSPs in which every variable appears in at most $r$ constraints, where $ε_r$ depends only on $r$ and $k\in o(\sqrt{m})$. Furthermore our algorithm solves the corresponding #CSP-SAT and Max-CSP-SAT of these CSPs. We also show that CNF representations of unsatisfiable $(2, k)$-CSPs with variable frequency $r$ can be refuted in tree-like resolution in size $2^{(1 - ε_r)m}$. Furthermore for Tseitin formulas on graphs with degree at most $k$ (which are $(2, k)$-CSPs) we give a deterministic algorithm finding such a refutation.
Given a Boolean function $f:\{-1,1\}^n\to \{-1,1\}$, the Fourier distribution assigns probability $\widehat{f}(S)^2$ to $S\subseteq [n]$. The Fourier Entropy-Influence (FEI) conjecture of Friedgut and Kalai asks if there exist a universal constant C>0 such that $H(\hat{f}^2)\leq C Inf(f)$, where $H(\hat{f}^2)$ is the Shannon entropy of the Fourier distribution of $f$ and $Inf(f)$ is the total influence of $f$. 1) We consider the weaker Fourier Min-entropy-Influence (FMEI) conjecture. This asks if $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)\leq C Inf(f)$, where $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)$ is the min-entropy of the Fourier distribution. We show $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)\leq 2C_{\min}^\oplus(f)$, where $C_{\min}^\oplus(f)$ is the minimum parity certificate complexity of $f$. We also show that for every $ε\geq 0$, we have $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)\leq 2\log (\|\hat{f}\|_{1,ε}/(1-ε))$, where $\|\hat{f}\|_{1,ε}$ is the approximate spectral norm of $f$. As a corollary, we verify the FMEI conjecture for the class of read-$k$ $DNF$s (for constant $k$). 2) We show that $H(\hat{f}^2)\leq 2 aUC^\oplus(f)$, where $aUC^\oplus(f)$ is the average unambiguous parity certificate complexity of $f$. This improves upon Chakraborty et al. An important consequence of the FEI conjecture is the long-standing Mansour's conjecture. We show that a weaker version of FEI already implies Mansour's conjecture: is $H(\hat{f}^2)\leq C \min\{C^0(f),C^1(f)\}$?, where $C^0(f), C^1(f)$ are the 0- and 1-certificate complexities of $f$, respectively. 3) We study what FEI implies about the structure of polynomials that 1/3-approximate a Boolean function. We pose a conjecture (which is implied by FEI): no "flat" degree-$d$ polynomial of sparsity $2^{ω(d)}$ can 1/3-approximate a Boolean function. We prove this conjecture unconditionally for a particular class of polynomials.
We build boolean circuits of size $O(nm^2)$ and depth $O(\log(n) + m \log(m))$ for sorting $n$ integers each of $m$-bits. We build also circuits that sort $n$ integers each of $m$-bits according to their first $k$ bits that are of size $O(nmk(1 + \log^*(n) - \log^*(m)))$ and depth $O(\log^{3}(n))$. This improves on the result of Asharov et al. arXiv:2010.09884 and resolves some of their open questions.
In this paper, we investigate the relative power of several conjectures that attracted recently lot of interest. We establish a connection between the Network Coding Conjecture (NCC) of Li and Li and several data structure like problems such as non-adaptive function inversion of Hellman and the well-studied problem of polynomial evaluation and interpolation. In turn these data structure problems imply super-linear circuit lower bounds for explicit functions such as integer sorting and multi-point polynomial evaluation.
In this paper we study the computational complexity of functions that have efficient card-based protocols. Card-based protocols were proposed by den Boer [EUROCRYPT '89] as a means for secure two-party computation. Our contribution is two-fold: We classify a large class of protocols with respect to the computational complexity of functions they compute, and we propose other encodings of inputs which require fewer cards than the usual 2-card representation.
Oblivious RAM (ORAM), introduced in the context of software protection by Goldreich and Ostrovsky [JACM'96], aims at obfuscating the memory access pattern induced by a RAM computation. Ideally, the memory access pattern of an ORAM should be independent of the data being processed. Since the work of Goldreich and Ostrovsky, it was believed that there is an inherent $ Ω(\log n) $ bandwidth overhead in any ORAM working with memory of size $ n $. Larsen and Nielsen [CRYPTO'18] were the first to give a general $ Ω(\log n) $ lower bound for any online ORAM, i.e., an ORAM that must process its inputs in an online manner. In this work, we revisit the lower bound of Larsen and Nielsen, which was proved under the assumption that the adversarial server knows exactly which server accesses correspond to which input operation. We give an $Ω(\log n) $ lower bound for the bandwidth overhead of any online ORAM even when the adversary has no access to this information. For many known constructions of ORAM this information is provided implicitly as each input operation induces an access sequence of roughly the same length. Thus, they are subject to the lower bound of Larsen and Nielsen. Our results rule out a broader class of constructions and specifically, they imply that obfuscating the boundaries between the input operations does not help in building a more efficient ORAM. As our main technical contribution and to handle the lack of structure, we study the properties of access graphs induced naturally by the memory access pattern of an ORAM computation. We identify a particular graph property that can be efficiently tested and that all access graphs of ORAM computation must satisfy with high probability. This property is reminiscent of the Larsen-Nielsen property but it is substantially less structured; that is, it is more generic.
For any $T \geq 1$, there are constants $R=R(T) \geq 1$ and $ζ=ζ(T)>0$ and a randomized algorithm that takes as input an integer $n$ and two strings $x,y$ of length at most $n$, and runs in time $O(n^{1+\frac{1}{T}})$ and outputs an upper bound $U$ on the edit distance $ED(x,y)$ that with high probability, satisfies $U \leq R(ED(x,y)+n^{1-ζ})$. In particular, on any input with $ED(x,y) \geq n^{1-ζ}$ the algorithm outputs a constant factor approximation with high probability. A similar result has been proven independently by Brakensiek and Rubinstein (2019).