arXiv subjects

Michal Töpfer

Publications and source records attributed to Michal Töpfer.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study

Vibe coding inherently assumes iterative refinement of LLM-generated code through feedback loops. While effective for conventional software tasks, its reliability in runtime-adaptive systems is unclear -- especially when generated code is not manually inspected. This paper studies feedback-based automated verification of LLM-generated adaptation managers in Collective Adaptive Systems (CAS). We focus on the key challenges of verification in the loop: how to detect failures of generated code at runtime and how to report them precisely enough for an LLM to fix them. We combine the adaptation loop with a vibe-coding feedback loop where correctness is checked against (i) generic architectural constraints and (ii) functional constraints formalized in Functional Constraints Logic (FCL), a novel first-order temporal logic over potentially finite traces. Conducting the Dragon Hunt CAS case study, we show that fine-grained constraint violations provide actionable feedback that typically yields a valid adaptation manager within a few iterations, while simple coarse metric-based feedback often stalls. Our findings suggest that feedback precision is the dominant factor for reliable vibe coding in systems designed by domain experts with no programming skills, thereby obviating the need for human code inspection.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Feedback-based Automated Verification in Vibe Coding of CAS Adaptation Built on Constraint Logic

In CAS adaptation, a challenge is to define the dynamic architecture of the system and changes in its behavior. Implementation-wise, this is projected into an adaptation mechanism, typically realized as an Adaptation Manager (AM). With the advances of generative LLMs, generating AM code based on system specification and desired AM behavior (partially in natural language) is a tempting opportunity. The recent introduction of vibe coding suggests a way to target the problem of the correctness of generated code by iterative testing and vibe coding feedback loops instead of direct code inspection. In this paper, we show that generating an AM via vibe coding feedback loops is a viable option when the verification of the generated AM is based on a very precise formulation of the functional requirements. We specify these as constraints in a novel temporal logic FCL that allows us to express the behavior of traces with much finer granularity than classical LTL enables. Furthermore, we show that by combining the adaptation and vibe coding feedback loops where the FCL constraints are evaluated for the current system state, we achieved good results in the experiments with generating AMs for two example systems from the CAS domain. Typically, just a few feedback loop iterations were necessary, each feeding the LLM with reports describing detailed violations of the constraints. This AM testing was combined with high run path coverage achieved by different initial settings.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Tutoring LLM into a Better CUDA Optimizer

Recent leaps in large language models (LLMs) caused a revolution in programming tools (like GitHub Copilot) that can help with code generation, debugging, and even performance optimization. In this paper, we focus on the capabilities of the most recent reasoning models to generate optimized CUDA code for predefined, well-known tasks. Our objective is to determine which types of code optimizations and parallel patterns the LLMs can perform by themselves and whether they can be improved by tutoring (providing more detailed hints and guidelines in the prompt). The generated solutions were evaluated both automatically (for correctness and speedup) and manually (code reviews) to provide a more detailed perspective. We also tried an interactive approach where the LLM can fix its previous mistakes within a session. The results indicate that LLMs are quite skilled coders; however, they require tutoring to reach optimized solutions provided by parallel computing experts.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2023

Online ML Self-adaptation in Face of Traps

Online machine learning (ML) is often used in self-adaptive systems to strengthen the adaptation mechanism and improve the system utility. Despite such benefits, applying online ML for self-adaptation can be challenging, and not many papers report its limitations. Recently, we experimented with applying online ML for self-adaptation of a smart farming scenario and we had faced several unexpected difficulties -- traps -- that, to our knowledge, are not discussed enough in the community. In this paper, we report our experience with these traps. Specifically, we discuss several traps that relate to the specification and online training of the ML-based estimators, their impact on self-adaptation, and the approach used to evaluate the estimators. Our overview of these traps provides a list of lessons learned, which can serve as guidance for other researchers and practitioners when applying online ML for self-adaptation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Ensemble-based modeling abstractions for modern self-optimizing systems

In this paper, we extend our ensemble-based component model DEECo with the capability to use machine-learning and optimization heuristics in establishing and reconfiguration of autonomic component ensembles. We show how to capture these concepts on the model level and give an example of how such a model can be beneficially used for modeling access-control related problem in the Industry 4.0 settings. We argue that incorporating machine-learning and optimization heuristics is a key feature for modern smart systems which are to learn over the time and optimize their behavior at runtime to deal with uncertainty in their environment.

cs.LG↗