SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Michel H. Hof

Publications and source records attributed to Michel H. Hof.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Bivariate deconvolution for cancer detection after surgery

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in cancer patients after surgery can provide an early marker for disease recurrence and guide subsequent treatment decisions. Accurate and sensitive estimation of tumour burden after cancer surgery may be obtained through liq- uid biopsies, measuring circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using, for example, mutation-based Variant Allele Frequency (VAF) values. However, to be applicable to all patients this ei- ther requires tumour-informed, patient-specific mutation panels or sensitive, tumour-agnostic genome-wide measurements. We propose a solution that accounts for patient-specific charac- teristics in genome-wide screens. For that, we introduce a bivariate deconvolution model to estimate tumour proportion from circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profiles of patients before and after surgery. The observations are modelled as a convolution of two bivariate latent variables, corresponding to tumour and background signals, mixed by the tumour proportion at each measurement. This bivariate approach links pre- and post-surgery measurements improving estimation of the tumour proportion after surgery, when the tumour signal is potentially very weak, or absent. We approximate likelihood of the convolution through a discretisation of the bivariate density for each latent variable into a two-dimensional grid for each pair of observations which allows for fast maximum likelihood estimation. We evaluate the predictive performance of the estimated post-surgery tumour proportions based on cfDNA methylation against available mutation-based VAF values in one-year recurrence-free survival.

stat.ME

False Discovery estimation in Record Linkage

Integrating data from multiple sources expands research opportunities at low cost. However, due to different data collection processes and privacy constraints, unique identifiers are unavailable. Record Linkage (RL) algorithms address this by probabilistically linking records based on partially identifying variables. Since these variables lack the strength to perfectly combine information, RL procedures yield an imperfect set of linked records. Therefore, assessing the false discovery proportion (FDP) in RL is crucial for ensuring the reliability of subsequent analyses. In this paper, we introduce a novel method for estimating the FDP in RL for two overlapping data sets. We synthesise data from their estimated empirical distribution and use it along with real data in the linkage process. Since synthetic records cannot form links with real entities, they provide a means to estimate the amount of falsely linked pairs. Notably, this method applies to all RL techniques and across diverse settings where links and non-links have similar distributions -- typical in complex tasks with poorly discriminative linking variables and multiple records sharing similar information while representing different entities. By identifying the FDP in RL and selecting suitable model parameters, our approach enables to assess and improve the reliability of linked data. We evaluate its performance using established RL algorithms and benchmark data applications before deploying it to link siblings from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry, where the reliability of previous RL applications has never been confirmed. Through this application, we highlight the importance of accounting for linkage errors when studying mother-child dynamics in healthcare records.

stat.ME