SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Midori Kato

Publications and source records attributed to Midori Kato.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning Standard Model structure from LHC data with Riemannian flow matching

In this work we demonstrate that a single transformer-based generative model can capture Standard Model structure spanning five decades of invariant mass, from the sub-GeV regime to the TeV continuum, a range that no single Monte Carlo sample covers. To achieve this we design \textsc{ShellFlow}, a Riemannian conditional flow matching model that, given the recorded event composition, generates each particle on its on-shell manifold. Its only physics priors are the on-shell condition and the invariant-mass formula. The model is trained on $\sim 10^{9}$ real $pp$ collision events from the ATLAS Open Data 13~TeV release and told nothing else. From a single training run, the model learns to reproduce all of the following: intra-particle kinematics, the dilepton resonances ($J/\psi$, $\Upsilon$, $Z$) at their PDG positions, the leptonic Weinberg angle, the $W$ and top-quark masses, and inter-particle correlations that enter no training objective. A substantial fraction of the Standard Model is thus learnable directly from recorded collision data.

hep-ph

On characters and formal degrees of discrete series of affine Hecke algebras of classical types

We address two fundamental questions in the representation theory of affine Hecke algebras of classical types. One is an inductive algorithm to compute characters of tempered modules, and the other is the determination of the constants in the formal degrees of discrete series (in the form conjectured by Reeder \cite{Re}). The former is completely different than the Lusztig-Shoji algorithm \cite{Sh, L}, and it is more effective in a number of cases. The main idea in our proof is to introduce a new family of representations which behave like tempered modules, but for which it is easier to analyze the effect of parameter specializations. Our proof also requires a comparison of the $C^{\ast}$-theoretic results of Opdam, Delorme, Slooten, Solleveld \cite{O, DO, Sl2, OSa, OS}, and the geometric construction from \cite{K1,K2,CK}.

math.RT