Mikael Turkki | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

An analysis of the Type Ia SN 2024gy and a comparison of different host extinction estimation techniques

Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are well-known standardisable candles, and are one of the main ways to measure the distance to their host galaxies. However, extinction due to interstellar dust causes objects to appear fainter and redder. Correcting for this requires estimating the amount of intervening material and how the extinction changes as a function of wavelength. We present and analyse optical and near-infrared data of the well-observed SN 2024gy and use these to compare different extinction estimation techniques, making use of photometric, spectroscopic, and polarimetric data. SN 2024gy is a normal SN Ia with high velocity (HV) components in Si II $\lambda6355$ (phase $<-10$ days) and a particularly strong HV feature in the Ca II near-infrared triplet (up to peak). Modelling SN 2024gy with TARDIS shows better matches with a double-detonation scenario compared to a delayed-detonation scenario due to a better match to the Ca II HV component. A measurement of the stable Ni/Fe ratio however favours a delayed-detonation scenario. Host extinction estimates range from $E(B-V)_{host}=0.12\pm0.02$ mag (narrow interstellar absorption lines) to $E(B-V)_{host}=0.24\pm0.06$ mag (Lira law) with a mean of $E(B-V)_{host}=0.22\pm0.04$ mag, assuming $R_V=3.1$. The spread between different methods highlights the challenge of accurately estimating the amount of extinction light suffers before being observed.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2025

A real-time search for Type Ia Supernovae with late-time CSM interaction in ZTF

The nature of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor systems and the mechanisms that lead up to their explosions are still widely debated. In rare cases the SN ejecta interact with circumstellar material (CSM) that was ejected from the progenitor system prior to the SN. The unknown distance between the CSM and SN explosion site makes it impossible to predict when the interaction will start. If the time between the SN and start of CSM interaction is of the order of months to years the SN has generally faded and is not actively followed up anymore, making it even more difficult to detect the interaction while it happens. Here we report on a real-time monitoring program which ran between 13-11-2023 and 09-07-2024, monitoring 6914 SNe Ia for signs of late-time rebrightening using the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF). Flagged candidates were rapidly followed up with photometry and spectroscopy to confirm the late-time excess and its position. We report the discovery of a $\sim50$ day rebrightening event in SN 2020qxz around 1200 days after the peak of its light curve. SN 2020qxz had signs of early CSM interaction but faded from view over 2 years before its reappearance. Follow-up spectroscopy revealed 4 emission lines that faded shortly after the end of the ZTF detected rebrightening. Our best match for these emission lines are H$β$ (blue shifted by $\sim5900$ km s$^{-1}$) and CaII$_{\lambda8542}$, NI$_{\lambda8567}$, and KI$_{λλ8763, 8767}$, all blue shifted by 5100 km s$^{-1}$ (although we note that these identifications are uncertain). This shows that catching and following up on late-time interactions as they occur can give new clues about the nature of the progenitor systems that produce these SNe by putting constraints on the possible type of donor star, and the only way to do this systematically is to use large sky surveys such as ZTF to monitor a large sample of objects.

astro-ph.HE↗