arXiv subjects

Mikaela Irene Fudolig

Publications and source records attributed to Mikaela Irene Fudolig.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Formative Study of Brief Affective Text as a Complement to Wearable Sensing for Longitudinal Student Health Monitoring

Wearable devices capture physiological and behavioral data with increasing fidelity, but the psychological context shaping these outcomes is difficult to recover from sensor data alone, limiting the utility of passive sensing for digital health goals such as early detection of distress, personalized intervention, and timely clinical outreach. We examined whether ultra-brief naturalistic concern text could serve as a scalable complement to passive sensing. In a year-long study of 458 university students (3,610 person-waves) tracked with Oura rings, participants responded bimonthly to an open-ended prompt about what concerned them most; responses had a median length of three words. We compared dictionary-based, general pretrained, and domain-adapted NLP approaches using within-person mixed-effects models across nine sleep and physical activity outcomes to determine which method best recovers physiologically relevant signal from brief naturalistic text. Weeks dominated by academic concern framing were associated with lower physical activity; weeks characterized by emotional exhaustion language were associated with poorer sleep quality and lower heart rate variability. General pretrained embeddings performed as well as or better than domain-adapted models across most outcomes, with differences between the two generally small and within the range of estimation noise. Zero-shot classification of concern topics showed no consistent evidence of association with outcomes; affective dimensions across all three methods showed more associations, though these did not survive correction for multiple comparisons, offering preliminary evidence that emotional register may carry more signal than topical content. These findings offer design guidance: ultra-brief affective prompts enrich the psychological interpretability of passive physiological data at minimal burden.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Tokens, the oft-overlooked appetizer: Large language models, the distributional hypothesis, and meaning

Tokenization is a necessary component within the current architecture of many language mod-els, including the transformer-based large language models (LLMs) of Generative AI, yet its impact on the model's cognition is often overlooked. We argue that LLMs demonstrate that the Distributional Hypothesis (DH) is sufficient for reasonably human-like language performance (particularly with respect to inferential lexical competence), and that the emergence of human-meaningful linguistic units among tokens and current structural constraints motivate changes to existing, linguistically-agnostic tokenization techniques, particularly with respect to their roles as (1) vehicles for conveying salient distributional patterns from human language to the model and as (2) semantic primitives. We explore tokenizations from a BPE tokenizer; extant model vocabularies obtained from Hugging Face and tiktoken; and the information in exemplar token vectors as they move through the layers of a RoBERTa (large) model. Besides creating suboptimal semantic building blocks and obscuring the model's access to the necessary distributional patterns, we describe how tokens and pretraining can act as a backdoor for bias and other unwanted content, which current alignment practices may not remediate. Additionally, we relay evidence that the tokenization algorithm's objective function impacts the LLM's cognition, despite being arguably meaningfully insulated from the main system intelligence. Finally, we discuss implications for architectural choices, meaning construction, the primacy of language for thought, and LLM cognition. [First uploaded to arXiv in December, 2024.]

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Gender Disparities in LLM-Based Intimate Partner Violence Detection

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major public health concern, and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for support and information-seeking in sensitive domains. We examine whether LLMs perceive relationship abuse differently depending on victim--perpetrator gender configuration. Using 475 Reddit posts from r/relationship\_advice, we generate counterfactual variants by swapping gendered identifiers to create four dyads: female--female (F/F), female--male (F/M), male--female (M/F), and male--male (M/M), where the first position denotes the victim. Four recent LLMs (GPT-5o, Gemini 3, Llama 4, and Grok 3) evaluate each variant using a structured questionnaire covering IPV, perpetrator intent, cheating, and abuse subtypes. Results show substantial variation across models and dyads. Abuse and intent detection systematically decrease in mixed-gender dyads where the victim is male, with female perpetrator identity emerging as a consistent negative predictor of abuse recognition. Mixed-effects logistic regression confirms that gender roles significantly shape model outputs. Our findings suggest that LLMs reproduce gendered biases from online training data, with implications for support-related deployment. Code and resources are available at https://github.com/TabiaTanzin/Gender-Disparities-in-LLM-Based-Intimate-Partner-Violence-Detection.git.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Taste for Privacy: How Context, Identity, and Lived-Experience Shape Information Sharing Preferences

Privacy preferences are not fixed individual traits, they depend on context and lived experiences. In this study, we analyze 2,912 survey responses from 782 college students collected over seven survey periods during 2023 and 2024. We ask about their usage of social media, the security settings of their accounts, and measure their comfort in sharing personally identifiable information (PII) across 17 different institutional contexts. Compared to past research, we observe a large shift towards private accounts, going from 1/3rd private in 2007 to 2/3rds in 2024, and find that participants' discomfort sharing PII with social media platforms strongly predicts their privacy settings. Beyond social media, we identify a stable ranking of institutional trust, though some institutions, like the police, show high variability reflecting divergent lived experiences. Traditionally marginalized groups and participants having faced adverse childhood experiences show more discomfort with institutions of power, especially in areas where they face greater vulnerability. We argue for context-adaptive privacy settings that recognize institutional relationships and demographic vulnerabilities, moving beyond one-size-fits-all consent frameworks toward contextually appropriate data governance.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Identifying Body Composition Measures That Correlate with Self-Compassion and Social Support

This study explores the relationship between body composition metrics, self-compassion, and social support among college students. Using seasonal body composition data from the InBody770 system and psychometric measures from the Lived Experiences Measured Using Rings Study (LEMURS) (n=156; freshmen=66, sophomores=90), Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) reveals body composition metrics exhibit moderate correlation with self-compassion and social support. Certain physiological and psychological features showed strong and consistent relationships with well-being across the academic year. Trunk and leg impedance stood out as key physiological indicators, while mindfulness, over-identification, affectionate support, and tangible support emerged as recurring psychological and social correlates. This demonstrates that body composition metrics can serve as valuable biomarkers for indicating self-perceived psychosocial well-being, offering insights for future research on scalable mental health modeling and intervention strategies.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

Collective sleep and activity patterns of college students from wearable devices

To optimize interventions for improving wellness, it is essential to understand habits, which wearable devices can measure with greater precision. Using high temporal resolution biometric data taken from the Oura Gen3 ring, we examine daily and weekly sleep and activity patterns of a cohort of young adults (N=582) in their first semester of college. A high compliance rate is observed for both daily and nightly wear, with slight dips in wear compliance observed shortly after waking up and also in the evening. Most students have a late-night chronotype with a median midpoint of sleep at 5AM, with males and those with mental health impairment having more delayed sleep periods. Social jetlag, or the difference in sleep times between free days and school days, is prevalent in our sample. While sleep periods generally shift earlier on weekdays and later on weekends, sleep duration on both weekdays and weekends is shorter than during prolonged school breaks, suggesting chronic sleep debt when school is in session. Synchronized spikes in activity consistent with class schedules are also observed, suggesting that walking in between classes is a widespread behavior in our sample that substantially contributes to physical activity. Lower active calorie expenditure is associated with weekends and a delayed but longer sleep period the night before, suggesting that for our cohort, active calorie expenditure is affected less by deviations from natural circadian rhythms and more by the timing associated with activities. Our study shows that regular sleep and activity routines may be inferred from consumer wearable devices if high temporal resolution and long data collection periods are available.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

A decomposition of book structure through ousiometric fluctuations in cumulative word-time

While quantitative methods have been used to examine changes in word usage in books, studies have focused on overall trends, such as the shapes of narratives, which are independent of book length. We instead look at how words change over the course of a book as a function of the number of words, rather than the fraction of the book, completed at any given point; we define this measure as "cumulative word-time". Using ousiometrics, a reinterpretation of the valence-arousal-dominance framework of meaning obtained from semantic differentials, we convert text into time series of power and danger scores in cumulative word-time. Each time series is then decomposed using empirical mode decomposition into a sum of constituent oscillatory modes and a non-oscillatory trend. By comparing the decomposition of the original power and danger time series with those derived from shuffled text, we find that shorter books exhibit only a general trend, while longer books have fluctuations in addition to the general trend. These fluctuations typically have a period of a few thousand words regardless of the book length or library classification code, but vary depending on the content and structure of the book. Our findings suggest that, in the ousiometric sense, longer books are not expanded versions of shorter books, but are more similar in structure to a concatenation of shorter texts. Further, they are consistent with editorial practices that require longer texts to be broken down into sections, such as chapters. Our method also provides a data-driven denoising approach that works for texts of various lengths, in contrast to the more traditional approach of using large window sizes that may inadvertently smooth out relevant information, especially for shorter texts. These results open up avenues for future work in computational literary analysis, particularly the measurement of a basic unit of narrative.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2021

Augmenting semantic lexicons using word embeddings and transfer learning

Sentiment-aware intelligent systems are essential to a wide array of applications. These systems are driven by language models which broadly fall into two paradigms: Lexicon-based and contextual. Although recent contextual models are increasingly dominant, we still see demand for lexicon-based models because of their interpretability and ease of use. For example, lexicon-based models allow researchers to readily determine which words and phrases contribute most to a change in measured sentiment. A challenge for any lexicon-based approach is that the lexicon needs to be routinely expanded with new words and expressions. Here, we propose two models for automatic lexicon expansion. Our first model establishes a baseline employing a simple and shallow neural network initialized with pre-trained word embeddings using a non-contextual approach. Our second model improves upon our baseline, featuring a deep Transformer-based network that brings to bear word definitions to estimate their lexical polarity. Our evaluation shows that both models are able to score new words with a similar accuracy to reviewers from Amazon Mechanical Turk, but at a fraction of the cost.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2021

Sentiment and structure in word co-occurrence networks on Twitter

We explore the relationship between context and happiness scores in political tweets using word co-occurrence networks, where nodes in the network are the words, and the weight of an edge is the number of tweets in the corpus for which the two connected words co-occur. In particular, we consider tweets with hashtags #imwithher and #crookedhillary, both relating to Hillary Clinton's presidential bid in 2016. We then analyze the network properties in conjunction with the word scores by comparing with null models to separate the effects of the network structure and the score distribution. Neutral words are found to be dominant and most words, regardless of polarity, tend to co-occur with neutral words. We do not observe any score homophily among positive and negative words. However, when we perform network backboning, community detection results in word groupings with meaningful narratives, and the happiness scores of the words in each group correspond to its respective theme. Thus, although we observe no clear relationship between happiness scores and co-occurrence at the node or edge level, a community-centric approach can isolate themes of competing sentiments in a corpus.

cs.CL↗