arXiv subjects

Milad Moradi

Publications and source records attributed to Milad Moradi.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Multi-modal user interface control detection using cross-attention

Detecting user interface (UI) controls from software screenshots is a critical task for automated testing, accessibility, and software analytics, yet it remains challenging due to visual ambiguities, design variability, and the lack of contextual cues in pixel-only approaches. In this paper, we introduce a novel multi-modal extension of YOLOv5 that integrates GPT-generated textual descriptions of UI images into the detection pipeline through cross-attention modules. By aligning visual features with semantic information derived from text embeddings, our model enables more robust and context-aware UI control detection. We evaluate the proposed framework on a large dataset of over 16,000 annotated UI screenshots spanning 23 control classes. Extensive experiments compare three fusion strategies, i.e. element-wise addition, weighted sum, and convolutional fusion, demonstrating consistent improvements over the baseline YOLOv5 model. Among these, convolutional fusion achieved the strongest performance, with significant gains in detecting semantically complex or visually ambiguous classes. These results establish that combining visual and textual modalities can substantially enhance UI element detection, particularly in edge cases where visual information alone is insufficient. Our findings open promising opportunities for more reliable and intelligent tools in software testing, accessibility support, and UI analytics, setting the stage for future research on efficient, robust, and generalizable multi-modal detection systems.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

An empirical study of LoRA-based fine-tuning of large language models for automated test case generation

Automated test case generation from natural language requirements remains a challenging problem in software engineering due to the ambiguity of requirements and the need to produce structured, executable test artifacts. Recent advances in LLMs have shown promise in addressing this task; however, their effectiveness depends on task-specific adaptation and efficient fine-tuning strategies. In this paper, we present a comprehensive empirical study on the use of parameter-efficient fine-tuning, specifically LoRA, for requirement-based test case generation. We evaluate multiple LLM families, including open-source and proprietary models, under a unified experimental pipeline. The study systematically explores the impact of key LoRA hyperparameters, including rank, scaling factor, and dropout, on downstream performance. We propose an automated evaluation framework based on GPT-4o, which assesses generated test cases across nine quality dimensions. Experimental results demonstrate that LoRA-based fine-tuning significantly improves the performance of all open-source models, with Ministral-8B achieving the best results among them. Furthermore, we show that a fine-tuned 8B open-source model can achieve performance comparable to pre-fine-tuned GPT-4.1 models, highlighting the effectiveness of parameter-efficient adaptation. While GPT-4.1 models achieve the highest overall performance, the performance gap between proprietary and open-source models is substantially reduced after fine-tuning. These findings provide important insights into model selection, fine-tuning strategies, and evaluation methods for automated test generation. In particular, they demonstrate that cost-efficient, locally deployable open-source models can serve as viable alternatives to proprietary systems when combined with well-designed fine-tuning approaches.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Artificial intelligence for context-aware visual change detection in software test automation

Automated software testing is integral to the software development process, streamlining workflows and ensuring product reliability. Visual testing, particularly for user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) validation, plays a vital role in maintaining software quality. However, conventional techniques such as pixel-wise comparison and region-based visual change detection often fail to capture contextual similarities, subtle variations, and spatial relationships between UI elements. In this paper, we propose a novel graph-based approach for context-aware visual change detection in software test automation. Our method leverages a machine learning model (YOLOv5) to detect UI controls from software screenshots and constructs a graph that models their contextual and spatial relationships. This graph structure is then used to identify correspondences between UI elements across software versions and to detect meaningful changes. The proposed method incorporates a recursive similarity computation that combines structural, visual, and textual cues, offering a robust and holistic model of UI changes. We evaluate our approach on a curated dataset of real-world software screenshots and demonstrate that it reliably detects both simple and complex UI changes. Our method significantly outperforms pixel-wise and region-based baselines, especially in scenarios requiring contextual understanding. We also discuss current limitations related to dataset diversity, baseline complexity, and model generalization, and outline planned future improvements. Overall, our work advances the state of the art in visual change detection and provides a practical solution for enhancing the reliability and maintainability of evolving software interfaces.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

A critical review of methods and challenges in large language models

This critical review provides an in-depth analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs), encompassing their foundational principles, diverse applications, and advanced training methodologies. We critically examine the evolution from Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to Transformer models, highlighting the significant advancements and innovations in LLM architectures. The review explores state-of-the-art techniques such as in-context learning and various fine-tuning approaches, with an emphasis on optimizing parameter efficiency. We also discuss methods for aligning LLMs with human preferences, including reinforcement learning frameworks and human feedback mechanisms. The emerging technique of retrieval-augmented generation, which integrates external knowledge into LLMs, is also evaluated. Additionally, we address the ethical considerations of deploying LLMs, stressing the importance of responsible and mindful application. By identifying current gaps and suggesting future research directions, this review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of the present state and potential advancements in LLMs. This work serves as an insightful guide for researchers and practitioners in artificial intelligence, offering a unified perspective on the strengths, limitations, and future prospects of LLMs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Multi-level biomedical NER through multi-granularity embeddings and enhanced labeling

Biomedical Named Entity Recognition (NER) is a fundamental task of Biomedical Natural Language Processing for extracting relevant information from biomedical texts, such as clinical records, scientific publications, and electronic health records. The conventional approaches for biomedical NER mainly use traditional machine learning techniques, such as Conditional Random Fields and Support Vector Machines or deep learning-based models like Recurrent Neural Networks and Convolutional Neural Networks. Recently, Transformer-based models, including BERT, have been used in the domain of biomedical NER and have demonstrated remarkable results. However, these models are often based on word-level embeddings, limiting their ability to capture character-level information, which is effective in biomedical NER due to the high variability and complexity of biomedical texts. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a hybrid approach that integrates the strengths of multiple models. In this paper, we proposed an approach that leverages fine-tuned BERT to provide contextualized word embeddings, a pre-trained multi-channel CNN for character-level information capture, and following by a BiLSTM + CRF for sequence labelling and modelling dependencies between the words in the text. In addition, also we propose an enhanced labelling method as part of pre-processing to enhance the identification of the entity's beginning word and thus improve the identification of multi-word entities, a common challenge in biomedical NER. By integrating these models and the pre-processing method, our proposed model effectively captures both contextual information and detailed character-level information. We evaluated our model on the benchmark i2b2/2010 dataset, achieving an F1-score of 90.11. These results illustrate the proficiency of our proposed model in performing biomedical Named Entity Recognition.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence for object detection in image data

In recent years, deep neural networks have been widely used for building high-performance Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems for computer vision applications. Object detection is a fundamental task in computer vision, which has been greatly progressed through developing large and intricate AI models. However, the lack of transparency is a big challenge that may not allow the widespread adoption of these models. Explainable artificial intelligence is a field of research where methods are developed to help users understand the behavior, decision logics, and vulnerabilities of AI systems. Previously, few explanation methods were developed for object detection based on random masking. However, random masks may raise some issues regarding the actual importance of pixels within an image. In this paper, we design and implement a black-box explanation method named Black-box Object Detection Explanation by Masking (BODEM) through adopting a hierarchical random masking approach for object detection systems. We propose a hierarchical random masking framework in which coarse-grained masks are used in lower levels to find salient regions within an image, and fine-grained mask are used to refine the salient regions in higher levels. Experimentations on various object detection datasets and models showed that BODEM can effectively explain the behavior of object detectors. Moreover, our method outperformed Detector Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation (D-RISE) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) with respect to different quantitative measures of explanation effectiveness. The experimental results demonstrate that BODEM can be an effective method for explaining and validating object detection systems in black-box testing scenarios.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2023

ThoughtSource: A central hub for large language model reasoning data

Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 have recently demonstrated impressive results across a wide range of tasks. LLMs are still limited, however, in that they frequently fail at complex reasoning, their reasoning processes are opaque, they are prone to 'hallucinate' facts, and there are concerns about their underlying biases. Letting models verbalize reasoning steps as natural language, a technique known as chain-of-thought prompting, has recently been proposed as a way to address some of these issues. Here we present ThoughtSource, a meta-dataset and software library for chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. The goal of ThoughtSource is to improve future artificial intelligence systems by facilitating qualitative understanding of CoTs, enabling empirical evaluations, and providing training data. This first release of ThoughtSource integrates seven scientific/medical, three general-domain and five math word question answering datasets.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2022

GPT-3 Models are Poor Few-Shot Learners in the Biomedical Domain

Deep neural language models have set new breakthroughs in many tasks of Natural Language Processing (NLP). Recent work has shown that deep transformer language models (pretrained on large amounts of texts) can achieve high levels of task-specific few-shot performance comparable to state-of-the-art models. However, the ability of these large language models in few-shot transfer learning has not yet been explored in the biomedical domain. We investigated the performance of two powerful transformer language models, i.e. GPT-3 and BioBERT, in few-shot settings on various biomedical NLP tasks. The experimental results showed that, to a great extent, both the models underperform a language model fine-tuned on the full training data. Although GPT-3 had already achieved near state-of-the-art results in few-shot knowledge transfer on open-domain NLP tasks, it could not perform as effectively as BioBERT, which is orders of magnitude smaller than GPT-3. Regarding that BioBERT was already pretrained on large biomedical text corpora, our study suggests that language models may largely benefit from in-domain pretraining in task-specific few-shot learning. However, in-domain pretraining seems not to be sufficient; novel pretraining and few-shot learning strategies are required in the biomedical NLP domain.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2022

A global analysis of metrics used for measuring performance in natural language processing

Measuring the performance of natural language processing models is challenging. Traditionally used metrics, such as BLEU and ROUGE, originally devised for machine translation and summarization, have been shown to suffer from low correlation with human judgment and a lack of transferability to other tasks and languages. In the past 15 years, a wide range of alternative metrics have been proposed. However, it is unclear to what extent this has had an impact on NLP benchmarking efforts. Here we provide the first large-scale cross-sectional analysis of metrics used for measuring performance in natural language processing. We curated, mapped and systematized more than 3500 machine learning model performance results from the open repository 'Papers with Code' to enable a global and comprehensive analysis. Our results suggest that the large majority of natural language processing metrics currently used have properties that may result in an inadequate reflection of a models' performance. Furthermore, we found that ambiguities and inconsistencies in the reporting of metrics may lead to difficulties in interpreting and comparing model performances, impairing transparency and reproducibility in NLP research.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2022

Deep Learning, Natural Language Processing, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in the Biomedical Domain

In this article, we first give an introduction to artificial intelligence and its applications in biology and medicine in Section 1. Deep learning methods are then described in Section 2. We narrow down the focus of the study on textual data in Section 3, where natural language processing and its applications in the biomedical domain are described. In Section 4, we give an introduction to explainable artificial intelligence and discuss the importance of explainability of artificial intelligence systems, especially in the biomedical domain.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2021

Improving the robustness and accuracy of biomedical language models through adversarial training

Deep transformer neural network models have improved the predictive accuracy of intelligent text processing systems in the biomedical domain. They have obtained state-of-the-art performance scores on a wide variety of biomedical and clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) benchmarks. However, the robustness and reliability of these models has been less explored so far. Neural NLP models can be easily fooled by adversarial samples, i.e. minor changes to input that preserve the meaning and understandability of the text but force the NLP system to make erroneous decisions. This raises serious concerns about the security and trust-worthiness of biomedical NLP systems, especially when they are intended to be deployed in real-world use cases. We investigated the robustness of several transformer neural language models, i.e. BioBERT, SciBERT, BioMed-RoBERTa, and Bio-ClinicalBERT, on a wide range of biomedical and clinical text processing tasks. We implemented various adversarial attack methods to test the NLP systems in different attack scenarios. Experimental results showed that the biomedical NLP models are sensitive to adversarial samples; their performance dropped in average by 21 and 18.9 absolute percent on character-level and word-level adversarial noise, respectively. Conducting extensive adversarial training experiments, we fine-tuned the NLP models on a mixture of clean samples and adversarial inputs. Results showed that adversarial training is an effective defense mechanism against adversarial noise; the models robustness improved in average by 11.3 absolute percent. In addition, the models performance on clean data increased in average by 2.4 absolute present, demonstrating that adversarial training can boost generalization abilities of biomedical NLP systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2021

A critical analysis of metrics used for measuring progress in artificial intelligence

Comparing model performances on benchmark datasets is an integral part of measuring and driving progress in artificial intelligence. A model's performance on a benchmark dataset is commonly assessed based on a single or a small set of performance metrics. While this enables quick comparisons, it may entail the risk of inadequately reflecting model performance if the metric does not sufficiently cover all performance characteristics. It is unknown to what extent this might impact benchmarking efforts. To address this question, we analysed the current landscape of performance metrics based on data covering 3867 machine learning model performance results from the open repository 'Papers with Code'. Our results suggest that the large majority of metrics currently used have properties that may result in an inadequate reflection of a models' performance. While alternative metrics that address problematic properties have been proposed, they are currently rarely used. Furthermore, we describe ambiguities in reported metrics, which may lead to difficulties in interpreting and comparing model performances.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2021

Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input Perturbations

High-performance neural language models have obtained state-of-the-art results on a wide range of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, results for common benchmark datasets often do not reflect model reliability and robustness when applied to noisy, real-world data. In this study, we design and implement various types of character-level and word-level perturbation methods to simulate realistic scenarios in which input texts may be slightly noisy or different from the data distribution on which NLP systems were trained. Conducting comprehensive experiments on different NLP tasks, we investigate the ability of high-performance language models such as BERT, XLNet, RoBERTa, and ELMo in handling different types of input perturbations. The results suggest that language models are sensitive to input perturbations and their performance can decrease even when small changes are introduced. We highlight that models need to be further improved and that current benchmarks are not reflecting model robustness well. We argue that evaluations on perturbed inputs should routinely complement widely-used benchmarks in order to yield a more realistic understanding of NLP systems robustness.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2021

Deep learning models are not robust against noise in clinical text

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are attracting increasing interest in the medical domain due to their ability to learn complicated tasks that require human intelligence and expert knowledge. AI systems that utilize high-performance Natural Language Processing (NLP) models have achieved state-of-the-art results on a wide variety of clinical text processing benchmarks. They have even outperformed human accuracy on some tasks. However, performance evaluation of such AI systems have been limited to accuracy measures on curated and clean benchmark datasets that may not properly reflect how robustly these systems can operate in real-world situations. In order to address this challenge, we introduce and implement a wide variety of perturbation methods that simulate different types of noise and variability in clinical text data. While noisy samples produced by these perturbation methods can often be understood by humans, they may cause AI systems to make erroneous decisions. Conducting extensive experiments on several clinical text processing tasks, we evaluated the robustness of high-performance NLP models against various types of character-level and word-level noise. The results revealed that the NLP models performance degrades when the input contains small amounts of noise. This study is a significant step towards exposing vulnerabilities of AI models utilized in clinical text processing systems. The proposed perturbation methods can be used in performance evaluation tests to assess how robustly clinical NLP models can operate on noisy data, in real-world settings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2021

Hybrid deep learning methods for phenotype prediction from clinical notes

Identifying patient cohorts from clinical notes in secondary electronic health records is a fundamental task in clinical information management. However, with the growing number of clinical notes, it becomes challenging to analyze the data manually for phenotype detection. Automatic extraction of clinical concepts would helps to identify the patient phenotypes correctly. This paper proposes a novel hybrid model for automatically extracting patient phenotypes using natural language processing and deep learning models to determine the patient phenotypes without dictionaries and human intervention. The model is based on a neural bidirectional sequence model (BiLSTM or BiGRU) and a CNN layer for phenotypes identification. An extra CNN layer is run parallel to the hybrid model to extract more features related to each phenotype. We used pre-trained embeddings such as FastText and Word2vec separately as the input layers to evaluate other embedding's performance. Experimental results using MIMIC III database in internal comparison demonstrate that the proposed model achieved significant performance improvement over existing models. The enhanced version of our model with an extra CNN layer obtained a relatively higher F1-score than the original hybrid model. We also showed that BiGRU layer with FastText embedding had better performance than BiLSTM layer to identify patient phenotypes.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2020

Explaining Black-box Models for Biomedical Text Classification

In this paper, we propose a novel method named Biomedical Confident Itemsets Explanation (BioCIE), aiming at post-hoc explanation of black-box machine learning models for biomedical text classification. Using sources of domain knowledge and a confident itemset mining method, BioCIE discretizes the decision space of a black-box into smaller subspaces and extracts semantic relationships between the input text and class labels in different subspaces. Confident itemsets discover how biomedical concepts are related to class labels in the black-box's decision space. BioCIE uses the itemsets to approximate the black-box's behavior for individual predictions. Optimizing fidelity, interpretability, and coverage measures, BioCIE produces class-wise explanations that represent decision boundaries of the black-box. Results of evaluations on various biomedical text classification tasks and black-box models demonstrated that BioCIE can outperform perturbation-based and decision set methods in terms of producing concise, accurate, and interpretable explanations. BioCIE improved the fidelity of instance-wise and class-wise explanations by 11.6% and 7.5%, respectively. It also improved the interpretability of explanations by 8%. BioCIE can be effectively used to explain how a black-box biomedical text classification model semantically relates input texts to class labels. The source code and supplementary material are available at https://github.com/mmoradi-iut/BioCIE.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2020

Explaining black-box text classifiers for disease-treatment information extraction

Deep neural networks and other intricate Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have reached high levels of accuracy on many biomedical natural language processing tasks. However, their applicability in real-world use cases may be limited due to their vague inner working and decision logic. A post-hoc explanation method can approximate the behavior of a black-box AI model by extracting relationships between feature values and outcomes. In this paper, we introduce a post-hoc explanation method that utilizes confident itemsets to approximate the behavior of black-box classifiers for medical information extraction. Incorporating medical concepts and semantics into the explanation process, our explanator finds semantic relations between inputs and outputs in different parts of the decision space of a black-box classifier. The experimental results show that our explanation method can outperform perturbation and decision set based explanators in terms of fidelity and interpretability of explanations produced for predictions on a disease-treatment information extraction task.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2020

Post-hoc explanation of black-box classifiers using confident itemsets

Black-box Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, e.g. deep neural networks, have been widely utilized to build predictive models that can extract complex relationships in a dataset and make predictions for new unseen data records. However, it is difficult to trust decisions made by such methods since their inner working and decision logic is hidden from the user. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) refers to systems that try to explain how a black-box AI model produces its outcomes. Post-hoc XAI methods approximate the behavior of a black-box by extracting relationships between feature values and the predictions. Perturbation-based and decision set methods are among commonly used post-hoc XAI systems. The former explanators rely on random perturbations of data records to build local or global linear models that explain individual predictions or the whole model. The latter explanators use those feature values that appear more frequently to construct a set of decision rules that produces the same outcomes as the target black-box. However, these two classes of XAI methods have some limitations. Random perturbations do not take into account the distribution of feature values in different subspaces, leading to misleading approximations. Decision sets only pay attention to frequent feature values and miss many important correlations between features and class labels that appear less frequently but accurately represent decision boundaries of the model. In this paper, we address the above challenges by proposing an explanation method named Confident Itemsets Explanation (CIE). We introduce confident itemsets, a set of feature values that are highly correlated to a specific class label. CIE utilizes confident itemsets to discretize the whole decision space of a model to smaller subspaces.

cs.AI↗