SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ming Chao

Publications and source records attributed to Ming Chao.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multimodal Deep Learning for Uncertainty-Aware Radiation Pneumonitis Risk Prediction

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common and clinically significant toxicity of thoracic radiation therapy that can cause pulmonary morbidity and impair quality of life. Although conventional dose-volume histogram-based metrics and normal tissue complication probability models are widely used for RP risk assessment, they inadequately capture the complex spatial, anatomical, and patient-specific factors underlying radiation-induced lung injury. Recent machine learning approaches have improved RP risk prediction by integrating multimodal clinical and imaging information; however, most provide a point risk estimate without quantifying the reliability of individual predictions, limiting their potential clinical utility. We propose a Multimodal Bayesian Diffusion Transformer (MM-DiT) framework that jointly estimates RP risk and characterizes the sources of predictive uncertainty. MM-DiT integrates planning computed tomography (CT) images and three-dimensional radiation dose distributions through self-supervised multimodal pre-training, reducing reliance on limited and potentially noisy toxicity labels. The resulting representations are further refined using a latent diffusion transformer and transferred to a Bayesian prediction framework for probabilistic RP risk estimation. A learnable label-noise model is incorporated to explicitly account for uncertainty arising from imperfect toxicity annotations. Therefore, it provides individualized RP risk estimates with complementary measures of aleatoric, epistemic, and label uncertainty, enabling assessment of prediction reliability at the individual-patient level. We evaluated MM-DiT in two independent cohorts using complementary assessments of predictive discrimination, calibration, and uncertainty. The results demonstrate its potential to provide accurate RP risk estimates while quantifying clinically relevant sources of predictive uncertainty.

eess.IV

Impact of normal lung volume choices on radiation pneumonitis risk prediction in locally advanced NSCLC radiotherapy

This study is to evaluate the impact of lung volume choices on predicting radiation pneumonitis (RP) risk in patients with locally advanced NSCLC undergoing radiotherapy. Dosimetric variables V20, V5, and mean lung dose (MLD) were extracted from the treatment plans of 442 patients enrolled in the NRG Oncology RTOG 0617 trial. Three lung volumes were defined: total lung excluding gross-tumor-target (TL-GTV), total lung excluding clinical-target-volume (TL-CTV), and total lung excluding planning-target-volume (TL-PTV). Patients were grouped as no-RP2 (N = 377, grade <= 1 RP) and RP2 (N = 65, grade >= 2 RP). Statistical analyses were performed to assess the effect on lung volume definition on RP2 prediction. Three supervised machine learning (ML) models: logistic regression (LR), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were used to evaluate predictive performance. Model performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and statistical significance was tested via a bootstrap analysis. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret feature contributions to model predictions. Statistical analyses showed that V20 and MLD were significantly associated with RP2, while differences among volume definitions were not statistically significant. Both kNN and XGB classifiers consistently yielded higher AUC values for the TL-PTV definition compared to the other definitions, a finding supported by bootstrap analysis. SHAP analysis further indicated that V20 and MLD were the most influential predictors of RP2. Both statistical analysis and SHAP confirmed that V20 and MLD were associated with RP2. The ML models indicated that defining normal lung volume as total lung excluding PTV yielded the highest predictive performance for RP2 risk. Further validation using external datasets is warranted to confirm these findings.

physics.med-ph