arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Minghui Jiang.
For a planar point-set $P$, let D(P) be the minimum number of pairwise-disjoint empty disks such that each point in $P$ lies on the boundary of some disk. Further define D(n) as the maximum of D(P) over all n-element point sets. Hosono and Urabe recently conjectured that $D(n)=\lceil n/2 \rceil$. Here we show that $D(n) \geq n/2 + n/236 - O(\sqrt{n})$ and thereby disprove this conjecture.
Butman, Hermelin, Lewenstein, and Rawitz proved that Clique in t-interval graphs is NP-hard for t >= 3. We strengthen this result to show that Clique in 3-track interval graphs is APX-hard.
We show that the problem k-Dominating Set and its several variants including k-Connected Dominating Set, k-Independent Dominating Set, and k-Dominating Clique, when parameterized by the solution size k, are W[1]-hard in either multiple-interval graphs or their complements or both. On the other hand, we show that these problems belong to W[1] when restricted to multiple-interval graphs and their complements. This answers an open question of Fellows et al. In sharp contrast, we show that d-Distance k-Dominating Set for d >= 2 is W[2]-complete in multiple-interval graphs and their complements. We also show that k-Perfect Code and d-Distance k-Perfect Code for d >= 2 are W[1]-complete even in unit 2-track interval graphs. In addition, we present various new results on the parameterized complexities of k-Vertex Clique Partition and k-Separating Vertices in multiple-interval graphs and their complements, and present a very simple alternative proof of the W[1]-hardness of k-Irredundant Set in general graphs.
Given a convex region in the plane, and a sweep-line as a tool, what is best way to reduce the region to a single point by a sequence of sweeps? The problem of sweeping points by orthogonal sweeps was first studied in [2]. Here we consider the following \emph{slanted} variant of sweeping recently introduced in [1]: In a single sweep, the sweep-line is placed at a start position somewhere in the plane, then moved continuously according to a sweep vector $\vec v$ (not necessarily orthogonal to the sweep-line) to another parallel end position, and then lifted from the plane. The cost of a sequence of sweeps is the sum of the lengths of the sweep vectors. The (optimal) sweeping cost of a region is the infimum of the costs over all finite sweeping sequences for that region. An optimal sweeping sequence for a region is one with a minimum total cost, if it exists. Another parameter of interest is the number of sweeps. We show that there exist convex regions for which the optimal sweeping cost cannot be attained by two sweeps. This disproves a conjecture of Bousany, Karker, O'Rourke, and Sparaco stating that two sweeps (with vectors along the two adjacent sides of a minimum-perimeter enclosing parallelogram) always suffice [1]. Moreover, we conjecture that for some convex regions, no finite sweeping sequence is optimal. On the other hand, we show that both the 2-sweep algorithm based on minimum-perimeter enclosing rectangle and the 2-sweep algorithm based on minimum-perimeter enclosing parallelogram achieve a $4/π\approx 1.27$ approximation in this sweeping model.
Given two genomes with duplicate genes, \textsc{Zero Exemplar Distance} is the problem of deciding whether the two genomes can be reduced to the same genome without duplicate genes by deleting all but one copy of each gene in each genome. Blin, Fertin, Sikora, and Vialette recently proved that \textsc{Zero Exemplar Distance} for monochromosomal genomes is NP-hard even if each gene appears at most two times in each genome, thereby settling an important open question on genome rearrangement in the exemplar model. In this paper, we give a very simple alternative proof of this result. We also study the problem \textsc{Zero Exemplar Distance} for multichromosomal genomes without gene order, and prove the analogous result that it is also NP-hard even if each gene appears at most two times in each genome. For the positive direction, we show that both variants of \textsc{Zero Exemplar Distance} admit polynomial-time algorithms if each gene appears exactly once in one genome and at least once in the other genome. In addition, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for the related problem \textsc{Exemplar Longest Common Subsequence} in the special case that each mandatory symbol appears exactly once in one input sequence and at least once in the other input sequence. This answers an open question of Bonizzoni et al. We also show that \textsc{Zero Exemplar Distance} for multichromosomal genomes without gene order is fixed-parameter tractable if the parameter is the maximum number of chromosomes in each genome.
We obtain improved upper bounds and new lower bounds on the chromatic number as a linear function of the clique number, for the intersection graphs (and their complements) of finite families of translates and homothets of a convex body in $\RR^n$.
We present three new approximation algorithms with improved constant ratios for selecting $n$ points in $n$ disks such that the minimum pairwise distance among the points is maximized. (1) A very simple $O(n\log n)$-time algorithm with ratio $0.511$ for disjoint unit disks. (2) An LP-based algorithm with ratio $0.707$ for disjoint disks of arbitrary radii that uses a linear number of variables and constraints, and runs in polynomial time. (3) A hybrid algorithm with ratio either $0.4487$ or $0.4674$ for (not necessarily disjoint) unit disks that uses an algorithm of Cabello in combination with either the simple $O(n\log n)$-time algorithm or the LP-based algorithm. The LP algorithm can be extended for disjoint balls of arbitrary radii in $\RR^d$, for any (fixed) dimension $d$, while preserving the features of the planar algorithm. The algorithm introduces a novel technique which combines linear programming and projections for approximating Euclidean distances. The previous best approximation ratio for dispersion in disjoint disks, even when all disks have the same radius, was $1/2$. Our results give a partial answer to an open question raised by Cabello, who asked whether the ratio $1/2$ could be improved.
In comparative genomic, the first step of sequence analysis is usually to decompose two or more genomes into syntenic blocks that are segments of homologous chromosomes. For the reliable recovery of syntenic blocks, noise and ambiguities in the genomic maps need to be removed first. Maximal Strip Recovery (MSR) is an optimization problem proposed by Zheng, Zhu, and Sankoff for reliably recovering syntenic blocks from genomic maps in the midst of noise and ambiguities. Given $d$ genomic maps as sequences of gene markers, the objective of \msr{d} is to find $d$ subsequences, one subsequence of each genomic map, such that the total length of syntenic blocks in these subsequences is maximized. For any constant $d \ge 2$, a polynomial-time 2d-approximation for \msr{d} was previously known. In this paper, we show that for any $d \ge 2$, \msr{d} is APX-hard, even for the most basic version of the problem in which all gene markers are distinct and appear in positive orientation in each genomic map. Moreover, we provide the first explicit lower bounds on approximating \msr{d} for all $d \ge 2$. In particular, we show that \msr{d} is NP-hard to approximate within $Ω(d/\log d)$. From the other direction, we show that the previous 2d-approximation for \msr{d} can be optimized into a polynomial-time algorithm even if $d$ is not a constant but is part of the input. We then extend our inapproximability results to several related problems including \cmsr{d}, \gapmsrδ{d}, and \gapcmsrδ{d}.
The Fermat-Weber center of a planar body $Q$ is a point in the plane from which the average distance to the points in $Q$ is minimal. We first show that for any convex body $Q$ in the plane, the average distance from the Fermat-Weber center of $Q$ to the points of $Q$ is larger than ${1/6} \cdot Δ(Q)$, where $Δ(Q)$ is the diameter of $Q$. This proves a conjecture of Carmi, Har-Peled and Katz. From the other direction, we prove that the same average distance is at most $\frac{2(4-\sqrt3)}{13} \cdot Δ(Q) < 0.3490 \cdot Δ(Q)$. The new bound substantially improves the previous bound of $\frac{2}{3 \sqrt3} \cdot Δ(Q) \approx 0.3849 \cdot Δ(Q)$ due to Abu-Affash and Katz, and brings us closer to the conjectured value of ${1/3} \cdot Δ(Q)$. We also confirm the upper bound conjecture for centrally symmetric planar convex bodies.
We give the first nontrivial upper and lower bounds on the maximum volume of an empty axis-parallel box inside an axis-parallel unit hypercube in $\RR^d$ containing $n$ points. For a fixed $d$, we show that the maximum volume is of the order $Θ(\frac{1}{n})$. We then use the fact that the maximum volume is $Ω(\frac{1}{n})$ in our design of the first efficient $(1-\eps)$-approximation algorithm for the following problem: Given an axis-parallel $d$-dimensional box $R$ in $\RR^d$ containing $n$ points, compute a maximum-volume empty axis-parallel $d$-dimensional box contained in $R$. The running time of our algorithm is nearly linear in $n$, for small $d$, and increases only by an $O(\log{n})$ factor when one goes up one dimension. No previous efficient exact or approximation algorithms were known for this problem for $d \geq 4$. As the problem has been recently shown to be NP-hard in arbitrary high dimensions (i.e., when $d$ is part of the input), the existence of efficient exact algorithms is unlikely. We also obtain tight estimates on the maximum volume of an empty axis-parallel hypercube inside an axis-parallel unit hypercube in $\RR^d$ containing $n$ points. For a fixed $d$, this maximum volume is of the same order order $Θ(\frac{1}{n})$. A faster $(1-\eps)$-approximation algorithm, with a milder dependence on $d$ in the running time, is obtained in this case.
According to a classical result of Grünbaum, the transversal number $τ(\F)$ of any family $\F$ of pairwise-intersecting translates or homothets of a convex body $C$ in $\RR^d$ is bounded by a function of $d$. Denote by $α(C)$ (resp. $β(C)$) the supremum of the ratio of the transversal number $τ(\F)$ to the packing number $ν(\F)$ over all families $\F$ of translates (resp. homothets) of a convex body $C$ in $\RR^d$. Kim et al. recently showed that $α(C)$ is bounded by a function of $d$ for any convex body $C$ in $\RR^d$, and gave the first bounds on $α(C)$ for convex bodies $C$ in $\RR^d$ and on $β(C)$ for convex bodies $C$ in the plane. Here we show that $β(C)$ is also bounded by a function of $d$ for any convex body $C$ in $\RR^d$, and present new or improved bounds on both $α(C)$ and $β(C)$ for various convex bodies $C$ in $\RR^d$ for all dimensions $d$. Our techniques explore interesting inequalities linking the covering and packing densities of a convex body. Our methods for obtaining upper bounds are constructive and lead to efficient constant-factor approximation algorithms for finding a minimum-cardinality point set that pierces a set of translates or homothets of a convex body.
Let $S$ be a set of $n^2$ symbols. Let $A$ be an $n\times n$ square grid with each cell labeled by a distinct symbol in $S$. Let $B$ be another $n\times n$ square grid, also with each cell labeled by a distinct symbol in $S$. Then each symbol in $S$ labels two cells, one in $A$ and one in $B$. Define the \emph{combined distance} between two symbols in $S$ as the distance between the two cells in $A$ plus the distance between the two cells in $B$ that are labeled by the two symbols. Belén Palop asked the following question at the open problems session of CCCG 2009: How to arrange the symbols in the two grids such that the minimum combined distance between any two symbols is maximized? In this paper, we give a partial answer to Belén Palop's question. Define $c_p(n) = \max_{A,B}\min_{s,t \in S} \{\dist_p(A,s,t) + \dist_p(B,s,t) \}$, where $A$ and $B$ range over all pairs of $n\times n$ square grids labeled by the same set $S$ of $n^2$ distinct symbols, and where $\dist_p(A,s,t)$ and $\dist_p(B,s,t)$ are the $L_p$ distances between the cells in $A$ and in $B$, respectively, that are labeled by the two symbols $s$ and $t$. We present asymptotically optimal bounds $c_p(n) = Θ(\sqrt{n})$ for all $p=1,2,...,\infty$. The bounds also hold for generalizations to $d$-dimensional grids for any constant $d \ge 2$. Our proof yields a simple linear-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for maximizing the minimum combined distance between any two symbols in two grids.