SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Minna Genbäck

Publications and source records attributed to Minna Genbäck.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Uncertainty intervals for multilevel models with missing not at random data

We propose a sensitivity analysis method for missing not at random (MNAR) data in the context of linear multilevel (mixed-effects) models. The outcome and dropout risk are both modelled using multilevel models and a bias adjustment due to MNAR data is derived. This bias can be estimated from observed data conditional on specified values of sensitivity parameter(s). Under the assumption that these parameters lie within a plausible range, the method partially identify the parameters of interest, yielding bounds for estimation and inference under assumptions weaker than missing at random. The proposed analysis is investigated in a simulation study and illustrated with an analysis of the association between loneliness and physical activity with memory trajectories, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and health covariates.

stat.ME

Mediation analysis with case-control sampling: Identification and estimation in the presence of a binary mediator

With reference to a stratified case-control procedure based on a binary variable of primary interest, we derive the expression of the distortion induced by the sampling design on the parameters of the logistic model of a secondary variable. This is particularly relevant when performing mediation analysis (possibly in a causal framework) with stratified case-control data in settings where both the outcome and the mediator are binary. Our identification result opens the way to M-estimation and Maximum Likelihood estimation. We then conduct a simulation study showing the gain in efficiency of the estimators of both the outcome and mediator model parameters w.r. to existing methods, based on weighting. As an illustrative example, we reanalyze a German case-control dataset in order to investigate whether the effect of reduced immunocompetency on listeriosis onset is mediated by the intake of gastric acid suppressors.

stat.ME

Causal inference taking into account unobserved confounding

Causal inference with observational data can be performed under an assumption of no unobserved confounders (unconfoundedness assumption). There is, however, seldom clear subject-matter or empirical evidence for such an assumption. We therefore develop uncertainty intervals for average causal effects based on outcome regression estimators and doubly robust estimators, which provide inference taking into account both sampling variability and uncertainty due to unobserved confounders. In contrast with sampling variation, uncertainty due unobserved confounding does not decrease with increasing sample size. The intervals introduced are obtained by deriving the bias of the estimators due to unobserved confounders. We are thus also able to contrast the size of the bias due to violation of the unconfoundedness assumption, with bias due to misspecification of the models used to explain potential outcomes. This is illustrated through numerical experiments where bias due to moderate unobserved confounding dominates misspecification bias for typical situations in terms of sample size and modeling assumptions. We also study the empirical coverage of the uncertainty intervals introduced and apply the results to a study of the effect of regular food intake on health. An R-package implementing the inference proposed is available.

stat.ME