Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari

Publications and source records attributed to Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The GenAI4IDN Benchmark 3.0 - a Public Tool to Assess Generative AI Tools for the Design of Interactive Digital Narratives

This paper presents GENAI4IDN Benchmark 3.0, the third iteration of an evaluation framework to assess Generative AI tools for creating Interactive Digital Narratives (IDNs). Moving beyond manual testing, this iteration introduces AI-assisted evaluation through a publicly accessible web application (https://genai4idn.com), enabling the community to run benchmarks on demand, add new models, and propose new tasks. The revised evaluation framework is "blinded" to avoid model-bias, and can handle complex media such as music, videos, and full IDNs that previously required human raters. A significant addition - responding to concerns raised during ICIDS 2025 - is the addition of fact-checking and bias detection with dedicated tasks and rubrics, validated by human raters with lived experience in the depicted contexts. Findings from a diverse range of models report on maturing creative capabilities while observing runaway thinking and overzealous safety filters as limitations. Fact-checking reliably caught subtle historical inaccuracies, anachronisms, and fabricated claims while the bias rater consistently exposed structural assumptions, tropes, and marginalized group erasures.

cs.AI↗

INDCOR White Paper 0: Interactive Digital Narratives (IDNs) -- A Solution to the Challenge of Representing Complex Issues

Citizens everywhere have the right to be well-informed. Yet, with the high complexity of many contemporary issues, such as global warming and migration, our means of information need to mutually adapt. Narrative has always been at the core of information exchange - regardless of whether our ancestors sat around a fire and exchanged stories, or whether we read an article in a newspaper, or watched a TV news broadcast. Yet, the narrative formats of the newspaper article, the news broadcast, the documentary, and the textbook are severely limited when it comes to representing highly complex topics which may include several competing - and sometimes equally valid - perspectives. Such complexity contributes to a high level of uncertainty due to a multitude of factors affecting an outcome. Fortunately, with Interactive Digital Narrative (IDN), there is a novel media format which can address these challenges. IDNs can present several different perspectives in the same work, and give audiences the ability to explore them at will through decision-making. After experiencing the consequences of their decisions, the audience can replay to revisit and change these decisions in order to consider their alternatives. IDN works enable deep personalization and the inclusion of live data. These capabilities make IDN a 21st century democratic medium, empowering citizens through the understanding of complex issues. In this white paper, we discuss the challenge of representing complexity, describe the advantages offered by IDNs, and point out opportunities and strategies for deployment.

cs.MM↗

INDCOR white paper 1: A shared vocabulary for IDN (Interactive Digital Narratives)

COST Action 18230 INDCOR (Interactive Narrative Design for Complexity Representations) is an interdisciplinary network of researchers and practitioners intended to further the use of interactive digital narratives (IDN1) to represent highly complex topics. IDN possess crucial advantages in this regard, but more knowledge is needed to realize these advantages in broad usage by media producers and the general public. The lack of a shared vocabulary is a crucial obstacle on the path to a generalized, accessible body of IDN knowledge. This white paper frames the situation from the perspective of INDCOR and describes the creation of an online encyclopedia as a means to overcome this issue. Two similar and successful projects (The Living Handbook of Narratology and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) serve as examples for this effort, showing how community-authored encyclopedias can provide high-quality content. The authors introduce a taxonomy based on an overarching analytical framework (SPP model) as the foundational element of the encyclopedia, and detail editorial procedures for the project, including a peer-review process, designed to assure high academic quality and relevance of encyclopedia entries. Also, a sample entry provides guidance for authors.

cs.MM↗