Exact Interpolation under Noise: A Reproducible Comparison of Clough-Tocher and Multiquadric RBF Surfaces
This paper presents a reproducible comparison of cubic and radial basis function (RBF) interpolants for multivariate surface analysis. To eliminate evaluation bias, both methods are assessed under a unified slice-wise train/test protocol on the same synthetic function family. Performance is reported using RMSE, MAE, and $R^2$ in two regimes: (i) noise-free observations and (ii) noisy observations. In the noise-free regime, both interpolants achieve high accuracy with output-dependent advantages. In the noisy regime, exact interpolation overfits noisy nodes and degrades out-of-sample performance for both methods; in our experimental setting, the cubic interpolant is comparatively more stable. All experiments are fully reproducible through a single SciPy/NumPy-based script with a fixed random seed, repeated splits, and bootstrap-based uncertainty summaries. From an environmental engineering perspective, the main practical implication is that noisy or apparently inconsistent measurements in thermodynamic process systems should not be discarded by default; instead, they can be structured and interpolated to recover physically meaningful process behavior.