arXiv subjects

Mitchell Linegar

Publications and source records attributed to Mitchell Linegar.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Online Moderation in Competitive Action Games: How Intervention Affects Player Behaviors

Online competitive action games have flourished as a space for entertainment and social connections, yet they face challenges from a small percentage of players engaging in disruptive behaviors. This study delves into the under-explored realm of understanding the effects of moderation on player behavior within online gaming on an example of a popular title - Call of Duty(R): Modern Warfare(R)II. We employ a quasi-experimental design and causal inference techniques to examine the impact of moderation in a real-world industry-scale moderation system. We further delve into novel aspects around the impact of delayed moderation, as well as the severity of applied punishment. We examine these effects on a set of four disruptive behaviors including cheating, offensive user name, chat, and voice. Our findings uncover the dual impact moderation has on reducing disruptive behavior and discouraging disruptive players from participating. We further uncover differences in the effectiveness of quick and delayed moderation and the varying severity of punishment. Our examination of real-world gaming interactions sets a precedent in understanding the effectiveness of moderation and its impact on player behavior. Our insights offer actionable suggestions for the most promising avenues for improving real-world moderation practices, as well as the heterogeneous impact moderation has on indifferent players.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

American Views About Election Fraud in 2024

What are the opinions of American registered voters about election fraud and types of election fraud as we head into the final stages of the 2024 Presidential election? In this paper we use data from an online national survey of 2,211 U.S. registered voters interviewed between June 26 - July 3, 2024. Respondents were asked how common they thought that ten different types of election fraud might be in the U.S. In our analysis, we show that substantial proportions of U.S. registered voters believe that these types of election fraud are common. Our multivariate analysis shows that partisanship correlates strongly with endorsement of types of election fraud, with Republicans consistently more likely to state that types of election fraud are common, even when we control for a wide variety of other factors. We also find that conspiratorial thinking is strongly correlated with belief in the occurrence of types of election fraud, even when we control for partisanship. Our results reported in this paper provide important data regarding how American registered voters perceive the prevalence of types of election fraud, just months before the 2024 Presidential election.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2024

Towards Generalizable AI-Assisted Misinformation Inoculation: Protecting Confidence Against False Election Narratives

We present a generalizable AI-assisted framework for rapidly generating effective "prebunking" interventions against misinformation. Like mRNA vaccine platforms, our approach uses a stable template structure that can be quickly adapted to counter emerging false narratives. In a preregistered two-wave experiment with 4,293 U.S. registered voters, we test this framework against politically-charged election misinformation -- one of the most challenging domains for misinformation intervention. Our design directly tests scalability by comparing human-reviewed and purely AI-generated inoculation messages. We find that LLM-generated prebunking significantly reduced belief in election rumors (persisting for at least one week) and increased confidence in election integrity across partisan lines. Purely AI-generated messages proved as effective as human-reviewed versions, with some achieving larger protective effects, demonstrating that effective misinformation inoculation can be achieved at machine speed without proportional human effort, offering a scalable defense against the accelerating threat of false narratives across all domains.

econ.GN↗