arXiv subjects

Mohamed Abazeed

Publications and source records attributed to Mohamed Abazeed.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Ethical Framework for Responsible Foundational Models in Medical Imaging

The emergence of foundational models represents a paradigm shift in medical imaging, offering extraordinary capabilities in disease detection, diagnosis, and treatment planning. These large-scale artificial intelligence systems, trained on extensive multimodal and multi-center datasets, demonstrate remarkable versatility across diverse medical applications. However, their integration into clinical practice presents complex ethical challenges that extend beyond technical performance metrics. This study examines the critical ethical considerations at the intersection of healthcare and artificial intelligence. Patient data privacy remains a fundamental concern, particularly given these models' requirement for extensive training data and their potential to inadvertently memorize sensitive information. Algorithmic bias poses a significant challenge in healthcare, as historical disparities in medical data collection may perpetuate or exacerbate existing healthcare inequities across demographic groups. The complexity of foundational models presents significant challenges regarding transparency and explainability in medical decision-making. We propose a comprehensive ethical framework that addresses these challenges while promoting responsible innovation. This framework emphasizes robust privacy safeguards, systematic bias detection and mitigation strategies, and mechanisms for maintaining meaningful human oversight. By establishing clear guidelines for development and deployment, we aim to harness the transformative potential of foundational models while preserving the fundamental principles of medical ethics and patient-centered care.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2023

Self-Supervised Learning for Organs At Risk and Tumor Segmentation with Uncertainty Quantification

In this study, our goal is to show the impact of self-supervised pre-training of transformers for organ at risk (OAR) and tumor segmentation as compared to costly fully-supervised learning. The proposed algorithm is called Monte Carlo Transformer based U-Net (MC-Swin-U). Unlike many other available models, our approach presents uncertainty quantification with Monte Carlo dropout strategy while generating its voxel-wise prediction. We test and validate the proposed model on both public and one private datasets and evaluate the gross tumor volume (GTV) as well as nearby risky organs' boundaries. We show that self-supervised pre-training approach improves the segmentation scores significantly while providing additional benefits for avoiding large-scale annotation costs.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2022

An Efficient Multi-Scale Fusion Network for 3D Organ at Risk (OAR) Segmentation

Accurate segmentation of organs-at-risks (OARs) is a precursor for optimizing radiation therapy planning. Existing deep learning-based multi-scale fusion architectures have demonstrated a tremendous capacity for 2D medical image segmentation. The key to their success is aggregating global context and maintaining high resolution representations. However, when translated into 3D segmentation problems, existing multi-scale fusion architectures might underperform due to their heavy computation overhead and substantial data diet. To address this issue, we propose a new OAR segmentation framework, called OARFocalFuseNet, which fuses multi-scale features and employs focal modulation for capturing global-local context across multiple scales. Each resolution stream is enriched with features from different resolution scales, and multi-scale information is aggregated to model diverse contextual ranges. As a result, feature representations are further boosted. The comprehensive comparisons in our experimental setup with OAR segmentation as well as multi-organ segmentation show that our proposed OARFocalFuseNet outperforms the recent state-of-the-art methods on publicly available OpenKBP datasets and Synapse multi-organ segmentation. Both of the proposed methods (3D-MSF and OARFocalFuseNet) showed promising performance in terms of standard evaluation metrics. Our best performing method (OARFocalFuseNet) obtained a dice coefficient of 0.7995 and hausdorff distance of 5.1435 on OpenKBP datasets and dice coefficient of 0.8137 on Synapse multi-organ segmentation dataset.

eess.IV↗