Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji

Publications and source records attributed to Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A discrete generative model of neuronal spiking activity on microelectrode arrays

Generative models of neural activity could help characterize tissue dynamics, compare experimental conditions, and simulate population activity for applications ranging from disease and drug-response studies to closed-loop experimentation. Existing approaches, however, typically assume a fixed set of sorted neurons, whereas high-density microelectrode arrays produce extremely sparse, array-wide binary spike volumes in which the observed subset of electrodes varies across assays. We introduce a discrete generative model that represents this activity using a shared vocabulary of spatiotemporal motifs. A residual vector-quantized autoencoder learns the motif vocabulary, while a factorized masked transformer predicts where activity occurs and which motif appears at each active location. We evaluate the model on 31 assays spanning human brain organoids and acute \emph{ex vivo} human hippocampal tissue. The learned motifs are broadly reused: assay identity explains only $9%$ of the entropy in motif use, and motif overlap across tissue types is comparable to overlap within them. When representation quality is evaluated independently of the generative prior, our approach achieves $5.2\times$ the voxel-level reconstruction average precision of a matched flat tokenizer. For masked completion and free generation, the full model achieves $1.4$--$2.6\times$ the site-level average precision of the matched generative baseline and outperforms it across all four families of generation metrics. These results establish a compact, reusable representation for array-wide spiking activity without learned assay-specific parameters, providing a scalable foundation for generative modeling across diverse neural preparations.

cs.LG↗

SpikeProphecy: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Population Forecasting

Neural population models, which predict the joint firing of many simultaneously recorded neurons forward in time, are typically evaluated by a single aggregate Pearson correlation $r$ between predicted and actual spike counts, a number that masks critical structure. We argue that how we evaluate spike forecasting matters as much as what we build, and introduce SpikeProphecy, the first large-scale benchmark for causal, autoregressive spike-count forecasting on real electrophysiology recordings. Our core contribution is a population metric decomposition that separates aggregate performance into temporal fidelity, spatial pattern accuracy, and magnitude-invariant alignment. The decomposition surfaces aspects of the underlying data that an aggregate scalar collapses together. We apply the protocol to 105 Neuropixels sessions (Steinmetz 2019 + IBL Repeated Site; ~89,800 neurons) with seven architecture baselines spanning four structural families: four SSMs (three diagonal and one non-diagonal), a Transformer, an LSTM, and a spiking network. The decomposition surfaces a brain-region predictability ranking that reproduces across all seven baselines and survives ANCOVA correction for firing-statistics constraints (region $ΔR^2 = 0.018$ above the firing-statistics covariates). It also exposes a sub-Poisson evaluation floor where rigorous metrics combine with genuine biophysical constraints on regular spike trains, and yields a negative result on KL-on-output-rates distillation for ANN-to-SNN transfer in this Poisson count domain.

q-bio.NC↗

Implicit Behavioral Decoding from Next-Step Spike Forecasts at Population Scale

Closed-loop brain-computer interfaces often require both a forecast of upcoming neural population activity and a readout of the animal's behavioral state. A single Mamba forecaster, trained only on next-step spike counts at Neuropixels scale, can deliver both in one forward pass. A lightweight per-session linear head reading the model's predicted rates decodes behavior better than the same linear classifier reading the raw spike counts, under matched temporal context. We test on the Steinmetz visual-discrimination benchmark, which spans 39 sessions, roughly 27,000 neurons, and 1,994 held-out trials. Across three training seeds, Mamba's predicted rates decode mouse choice at 75.7$\pm$0.2% trial vote, roughly 2.3 times chance level, and stimulus side at 66.1$\pm$0.6%, about twice chance. Compared to a matched 500 ms-context linear decoder on the raw spike counts, Mamba wins at trial vote by 4-6 pp on response and 4-6 pp on stimulus side. A session-start calibration block of about 100-150 trials brings the readout within 1-2 pp of asymptote, and the full pipeline fits inside the 50 ms bin budget on workstation-class GPUs typical of tethered chronic Neuropixels recordings.

q-bio.NC↗

A Computational Perspective on NeuroAI and Synthetic Biological Intelligence

NeuroAI is an emerging field at the intersection of neuroscience and artificial intelligence, where insights from brain function guide the design of intelligent systems. A central area within this field is synthetic biological intelligence (SBI), which combines the adaptive learning properties of biological neural networks with engineered hardware and software. SBI systems provide a platform for modeling neural computation, developing biohybrid architectures, and enabling new forms of embodied intelligence. In this review, we organize the NeuroAI landscape into three interacting domains: hardware, software, and wetware. We outline computational frameworks that integrate biological and non-biological systems and highlight recent advances in organoid intelligence, neuromorphic computing, and neuro-symbolic learning. These developments collectively point toward a new class of systems that compute through interactions between living neural tissue and digital algorithms.

q-bio.NC↗

Starting a Synthetic Biological Intelligence Lab from Scratch

With the recent advancements in artificial intelligence, researchers and industries are deploying gigantic models trained on billions of samples. While training these models consumes a huge amount of energy, human brains produce similar outputs (along with other capabilities) with massively lower data and energy requirements. For this reason, more researchers are increasingly considering alternatives. One of these alternatives is known as synthetic biological intelligence, which involves training \textit{in vitro} neurons for goal-directed tasks. This multidisciplinary field requires knowledge of tissue engineering, bio-materials, digital signal processing, computer programming, neuroscience, and even artificial intelligence. The multidisciplinary requirements make starting synthetic biological intelligence research highly non-trivial and time-consuming. Generally, most labs either specialize in the biological aspects or the computational ones. Here, we propose how a lab focusing on computational aspects, including machine learning and device interfacing, can start working on synthetic biological intelligence, including organoid intelligence. We will also discuss computational aspects, which can be helpful for labs that focus on biological research. To facilitate synthetic biological intelligence research, we will describe such a general process step by step, including risks and precautions that could lead to substantial delay or additional cost.

q-bio.NC↗