Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Mollie S. Jagoe Brown

Publications and source records attributed to Mollie S. Jagoe Brown.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Kontsevich graphs act on Nambu-Poisson brackets, VI. Open problems

Kontsevich's graphs from deformation quantisation allow encoding multi-vectors whose coefficients are differential-polynomial in components of Poisson brackets on finite-dimensional affine manifolds. The calculus of Kontsevich graphs can be made dimension-specific for the class of Nambu--Poisson brackets given by Jacobian determinants. Using the Kontsevich--Nambu micro-graphs in dimensions $d\geqslant 2$, we explore the open problem of (non)triviality for Kontsevich's tetrahedral graph cocycle action on the space of Nambu--Poisson brackets. We detect a conjecturally infinite new set of differential-polynomial identities for Jacobian determinants of arbitrary sizes $d\times d$.

math.CO↗

Kontsevich graphs act on Nambu--Poisson brackets, IV. When the invisible becomes crucial

Kontsevich's graphs allow encoding multi-vectors whose coefficients are differential-polynomial in the coefficients of a given Poisson bracket on an affine real manifold. Encoding formulas by directed graphs adapts to the class of Nambu-determinant Poisson brackets, yet the graph topology becomes dimension-specific. To inspect whether a given Kontsevich graph cocycle $γ$ acts (non)trivially -- in the second Poisson cohomology -- on the space of Nambu brackets, taking a vector field solution $\smash{\vec{X}^γ_d}$ from dimension $d$ does not work in $d+1$. For $2 \leqslant d \leqslant 4$, the action of tetrahedron $γ_3$ on Nambu brackets is known to be a Poisson coboundary, $\dot{P} = [[ P,\smash{\vec{X}^{γ_3}_d} (P)]]$. We explore which minimal (sub)sets of graphs, encoding (non)vanishing objects over $\mathbb{R}^d_{\text{aff}}$, generate the topological data that suffice for a solution $\smash{\vec{X}^{γ_3}_{d+1}}$ to appear. We detect that there can be no solution in higher dimension without invisible graphs that vanish as formulas in $d=3$, but whose descendants do not all vanish over $d=4$.

math.CO↗

Kontsevich graphs act on Nambu--Poisson brackets, V. Implementation

In this series of papers, we established that $Q^{γ_3}_{d=4}(P)$ is a coboundary in 4D (paper II arXiv:2409.12555), and we presented a series of experimental results about the (non)trivialisation of Kontsevich graph flows of Nambu--Poisson brackets on $\mathbb{R}^d$ (paper IV). This immediate sequel V. to I.--IV. is a guide to working with the package $\textsf{gcaops}$ (https://github.com/rburing/gcaops) ($\textbf{G}$raph $\textbf{C}$omplex $\textbf{A}$ction $\textbf{O}$n $\textbf{P}$oisson $\textbf{S}$tructures) for $\textsf{SageMath}$ by Buring (2022). Specifically, we shall explain the script used in paper II (arXiv:2409.12555) and the use of it.

math.CO↗

Kontsevich graphs act on Nambu--Poisson brackets, II. The tetrahedral flow is a coboundary in 4D

Kontsevich constructed a map from suitable cocycles in the graph complex to infinitesimal deformations of Poisson bi-vector fields. Under the deformations, the bi-vector fields remain Poisson. We ask, are these deformations trivial, meaning, do they amount to a change of coordinates along a vector field? We examine this question for the tetrahedron, the smallest nontrivial suitable graph cocycle in the Kontsevich graph complex, and for the class of Nambu--Poisson brackets on $\mathbb{R}^d$. Within Kontsevich's graph calculus, we use dimension-specific micro-graphs, in which each vertex represents an ingredient of the Nambu--Poisson bracket. For the tetrahedron, Kontsevich knew that the deformation is trivial for $d = 2$ (1996). In 2020, Buring and the third author found that the deformation is trivial for $d = 3$. Building on these discoveries, we now establish that the deformation is trivial for $d = 4$.

math.QA↗

Kontsevich graphs act on Nambu-Poisson brackets, I. New identities for Jacobian determinants

Nambu-determinant brackets on $R^d\ni x=(x^1,...,x^d)$, $\{f,g\}_d(x)=ρ(x) \det(\partial(f,g,a_1,...,a_{d-2})/\partial(x^1,...,x^d))$, with $a_i\in C^\infty(R^d)$ and $ρ\partial_x\in\mathfrak{X}^d(R^d)$, are a class of Poisson structures with (non)linear coefficients, e.g., polynomials of arbitrarily high degree. With good cocycles in the graph complex, Kontsevich associated universal -- for all Poisson bivectors $P$ on affine $R^d_{aff}$ -- elements $\dot{P}=Q^γ(P)\in H^2_{P}(R^d_{aff})$ in the Lichnerowicz-Poisson second cohomology groups; we note that known graph cocycles $γ$ preserve the Nambu-Poisson class $\{P(ρ,a)\}$, and we express, directly from $γ$, the evolution $\dotρ$,$\dot{a}$ that induces $\dot{P}$. Over all $d\geq2$ at once, there is no universal mechanism for the bivector cocycles $Q^γ_d$ to be trivial, $Q^γ_d=[\![P,\vec{X}^γ_d(P)]\!]$, w.r.t. vector fields defined uniformly for all dimensions $d$ by the same graph formula. While over $R^2$, the graph flows $\dot{P} = Q^{γ_i}_{2D}(P(ρ))$ for $γ\in\{γ_3,γ_5,γ_7,...\}$ are trivialized by vector fields $\vec{X}^{γ_i}_{2D}=(dx\wedge dy)^{-1}d_{dR}(Ham^{γ_i}(P))$ of peculiar shape, we detect that in $d\geq3$, the 1-vectors from 2D, now with $P(ρ,a_1,...,a_{d-2})$ inside, do not solve the problems $Q^{γ_i}_{d\geq3}=[\![P,{\vec{X}^{γ_i}_{d\geq3}}(P(ρ,a))]\!]$, yet they do yield good Ansatz where we find solutions $\vec{X}^{γ_i}_{d=3,4}(P(ρ,a))$. In the study of the step $d\mapsto d+1$, by adapting the Kontsevich graph calculus to the Nambu-Poisson class of brackets, we discover more identities for the Jacobian determinants within $P(ρ,a)$, i.e. for multivector-valued $GL(d)$-invariants on $R^d_{aff}$.

math.QA↗