SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Mulah Moriah

Publications and source records attributed to Mulah Moriah.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Bayesian spatial modelling framework for assessing residential flood risk in property insurance

Spatial heterogeneity in insurance risk modelling is often represented using coarse areal structures, which can obscure fine-scale patterns critical for accurate risk assessment. This study introduces a point-referenced Bayesian framework to model claim occurrence and severity at the policyholder level, avoiding reliance on predefined geographic aggregation. Drawing on a large French insurance portfolio combined with high-resolution environmental variables, rainfall records, and institutional hazard maps, we compare a benchmark GLM with several discrete Bayesian specifications, including independent random effects, intrinsic conditional autoregressive (iCAR) and Besag-York-Mollie (BYM) models, and a continuously indexed Gaussian random field constructed using the stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach. Inference is performed using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA), enabling efficient estimation of latent spatial fields and non-linear covariate effects. Our results show that accounting for spatial dependence substantially improves occurrence modelling, while gains in severity prediction are more limited. The SPDE formulation further outperforms areal models by capturing sub-municipal risk gradients and reducing artefacts induced by arbitrary geographic partitioning. By conditioning on detailed building-level attributes, we isolate the contribution of latent spatial effects, refine the interpretation of observed covariates, and improve the allocation of risk premiums across the portfolio. In addition to enhanced predictive performance, the framework provides coherent uncertainty quantification and supports tail-risk assessment. To our knowledge, this is the first application of point-referenced SPDE models to flood insurance, offering a scalable statistical alternative for pricing and managing risks with strong spatial structure.

stat.AP

Contributions of geolocated weather and building related data for insurance assessment of flood risks

Floods rank among the costliest natural hazards, causing over USD 100 billion in insured losses between 2013 and 2023. In France, persistent deficits in the natural catastrophe scheme highlight the need for accurate, building-scale flood risk assessment. Insurers typically rely on frequency-severity models supported by hazard maps and regional climate indicators. However, previous studies show that such large-scale variables explain only a limited share of the variability in individual flood losses. This study evaluates the marginal contribution of multiple georeferenced data layers to modeling flood claim occurrence and severity in a large French home insurance portfolio. Starting from a baseline model based on standard underwriting information, we sequentially introduce climate-expert variables, extreme rainfall indicators, and fine-scale geolocated building and environmental attributes. The analysis focuses on a practical setting in which insurers cannot deploy full hydrological or hydraulic catastrophe models because of budgetary, licensing, or operational constraints. Results show that rainfall-based indicators, particularly a newly constructed metric capturing intense local precipitation, substantially improve claim modeling performance. Building and environmental variables further enhance occurrence prediction. Overall, the findings demonstrate how high-resolution geolocated data improve exposure and vulnerability assessment, complement official flood maps, and provide insurers with an operational framework for refining flood risk evaluation and pricing.

stat.AP

Measuring and Mitigating Biases in Motor Insurance Pricing

The non-life insurance sector operates within a highly competitive and tightly regulated framework, confronting a pivotal juncture in the formulation of pricing strategies. Insurers are compelled to harness a range of statistical methodologies and available data to construct optimal pricing structures that align with the overarching corporate strategy while accommodating the dynamics of market competition. Given the fundamental societal role played by insurance, premium rates are subject to rigorous scrutiny by regulatory authorities. These rates must conform to principles of transparency, explainability, and ethical considerations. Consequently, the act of pricing transcends mere statistical calculations and carries the weight of strategic and societal factors. These multifaceted concerns may drive insurers to establish equitable premiums, taking into account various variables. For instance, regulations mandate the provision of equitable premiums, considering factors such as policyholder gender or mutualist group dynamics in accordance with respective corporate strategies. Age-based premium fairness is also mandated. In certain insurance domains, variables such as the presence of serious illnesses or disabilities are emerging as new dimensions for evaluating fairness. Regardless of the motivating factor prompting an insurer to adopt fairer pricing strategies for a specific variable, the insurer must possess the capability to define, measure, and ultimately mitigate any ethical biases inherent in its pricing practices while upholding standards of consistency and performance. This study seeks to provide a comprehensive set of tools for these endeavors and assess their effectiveness through practical application in the context of automobile insurance.

stat.ML