SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Murray H. Loew

Publications and source records attributed to Murray H. Loew.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Pretreatment DCE-MRI Resolves Response Quality Within Pathologic Endpoints in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a strong neoadjuvant endpoint, yet 5-15% of complete responders recur and clinical/genomic variables do not reliably identify them. We tested whether pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI entropy - intratumoral enhancement heterogeneity - resolves response quality hidden within pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB). Across four cohorts (1,200 patients), a prespecified entropy threshold defined favorable and adverse structural states. Crossing structure with pathology yielded a four-tier framework spanning 4.1-fold recurrence in I-SPY1 and 7.7-fold at response extremes. In I-SPY2, 55 of 219 complete responders (25.1%) were structurally adverse, pretreatment. In an external HER2-positive responder synthesis (I-SPY1 pathology-confirmed pCR plus UCSF best-response proxy; n = 33, 10 events), adverse structure was associated with higher recurrence risk (HR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.38-5.96) capturing 7 of 10 recurrences, enriching rather than determining risk. In a HER2-positive RCB-0 subset, recurrence was 12.5% with favorable and 80.0% with adverse structure; Firth Cox regression preserved the association (HR = 8.13, 95% CI 1.71-49.21; n = 21, 6 events). In Duke (n = 908; 76 events), favorable structure remained independently associated with lower distant-recurrence risk (adjusted HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91). RNA linked favorable structure to a directionally reproduced immune-architecture program among non-overlapping patients within ISPY2; EMT-pathway enrichment was favorable-side, while the adverse tier contained a broadly immune-depleted substate. Yet full-cohort RNA models weakly discriminated structural state and did not recover continuous entropy. Pretreatment MRI therefore does not replace pCR or RCB; it reveals response-quality differences that these endpoints compress and identifies a recurrence-enriched group for prospective validation.

eess.IV

Pretreatment MRI reveals a latent, molecular-subtype-independent structural phenotype that organizes treatment trajectories and recurrence risk

Pathologic complete response and tumor shrinkage measure whether breast cancer responds to neoadjuvant therapy, but not whether that response was structurally favorable, persistent, or hidden beneath volume loss. We built an outcome-blind longitudinal DCE-MRI manifold from I-SPY2 trajectories to test whether pretreatment imaging carries a structural response phenotype missed by conventional descriptors. The dominant axis of response geometry was not recoverable from the full clinical and genomic stack -- age, receptor subtype, MammaPrint, PAM50, treatment arm, and tumor burden -- but became strongly recoverable once baseline structural entropy was added. A constrained representation mapping recovered the same axes as unconstrained decomposition, establishing the structure as intrinsic rather than a post-hoc interpretation. The phenotype persisted through therapy, and as treatment proceeded the volumetric signal faded while entropy stayed separated -- a crossover from burden to structural persistence. Among complete responders, structurally disordered tumors could shrink more early yet remain structurally disordered, a volumetric deception invisible to endpoint labels. External analyses in UCSF, I-SPY1, and Duke established recurrence relevance under representation-dependent boundaries, and a representation-family commensurability assessment showed why feature-name matching is insufficient: the same label can fail, transport, or entangle with extraction geometry. Pretreatment MRI therefore exposes a structural response phenotype that endpoint-based language leaves invisible -- including, among complete responders, a pretreatment imaging signal of structurally distinct response states that awaits prospective validation.

eess.IV