arXiv subjects

My Phan

Publications and source records attributed to My Phan.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Towards Automated Confidence Bound Provers and Searchers

In this work we lay the groundwork for automating the process of finding and proving the validity of lower confidence bounds of the mean. Our key finding is based on the observation that finding an optimal confidence bound under certain conditions can be formulated as an optimization problem. We use this observation to show that any valid confidence bound (such as Hoeffding's) must be a relaxation of a certain optimization problem. To automatically find and prove confidence bounds, we need to automate the process of defining and finding such a relaxation. We define a family of relaxations parameterized by a function called the order function. This family of relaxations can approximate any other target relaxation such as Hoeffding's by using the target as the order function. When the order function is linear (such as the sample mean in the case of Hoeffding's), our relaxation is a linear-size mixed-integer linear program.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2022

Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problems

We study bandit model selection in stochastic environments. Our approach relies on a meta-algorithm that selects between candidate base algorithms. We develop a meta-algorithm-base algorithm abstraction that can work with general classes of base algorithms and different type of adversarial meta-algorithms. Our methods rely on a novel and generic smoothing transformation for bandit algorithms that permits us to obtain optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$ model selection guarantees for stochastic contextual bandit problems as long as the optimal base algorithm satisfies a high probability regret guarantee. We show through a lower bound that even when one of the base algorithms has $O(\log T)$ regret, in general it is impossible to get better than $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ regret in model selection, even asymptotically. Using our techniques, we address model selection in a variety of problems such as misspecified linear contextual bandits, linear bandit with unknown dimension and reinforcement learning with unknown feature maps. Our algorithm requires the knowledge of the optimal base regret to adjust the meta-algorithm learning rate. We show that without such prior knowledge any meta-algorithm can suffer a regret larger than the optimal base regret.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Towards Practical Mean Bounds for Small Samples

Historically, to bound the mean for small sample sizes, practitioners have had to choose between using methods with unrealistic assumptions about the unknown distribution (e.g., Gaussianity) and methods like Hoeffding's inequality that use weaker assumptions but produce much looser (wider) intervals. In 1969, Anderson (1969) proposed a mean confidence interval strictly better than or equal to Hoeffding's whose only assumption is that the distribution's support is contained in an interval $[a,b]$. For the first time since then, we present a new family of bounds that compares favorably to Anderson's. We prove that each bound in the family has {\em guaranteed coverage}, i.e., it holds with probability at least $1-α$ for all distributions on an interval $[a,b]$. Furthermore, one of the bounds is tighter than or equal to Anderson's for all samples. In simulations, we show that for many distributions, the gain over Anderson's bound is substantial.

math.ST↗

arXiv2021

Designing Transportable Experiments

We consider the problem of designing a randomized experiment on a source population to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) on a target population. We propose a novel approach which explicitly considers the target when designing the experiment on the source. Under the covariate shift assumption, we design an unbiased importance-weighted estimator for the target population's ATE. To reduce the variance of our estimator, we design a covariate balance condition (Target Balance) between the treatment and control groups based on the target population. We show that Target Balance achieves a higher variance reduction asymptotically than methods that do not consider the target population during the design phase. Our experiments illustrate that Target Balance reduces the variance even for small sample sizes.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Regret Balancing for Bandit and RL Model Selection

We consider model selection in stochastic bandit and reinforcement learning problems. Given a set of base learning algorithms, an effective model selection strategy adapts to the best learning algorithm in an online fashion. We show that by estimating the regret of each algorithm and playing the algorithms such that all empirical regrets are ensured to be of the same order, the overall regret balancing strategy achieves a regret that is close to the regret of the optimal base algorithm. Our strategy requires an upper bound on the optimal base regret as input, and the performance of the strategy depends on the tightness of the upper bound. We show that having this prior knowledge is necessary in order to achieve a near-optimal regret. Further, we show that any near-optimal model selection strategy implicitly performs a form of regret balancing.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Thompson Sampling with Approximate Inference

We study the effects of approximate inference on the performance of Thompson sampling in the $k$-armed bandit problems. Thompson sampling is a successful algorithm for online decision-making but requires posterior inference, which often must be approximated in practice. We show that even small constant inference error (in $α$-divergence) can lead to poor performance (linear regret) due to under-exploration (for $α<1$) or over-exploration (for $α>0$) by the approximation. While for $α> 0$ this is unavoidable, for $α\leq 0$ the regret can be improved by adding a small amount of forced exploration even when the inference error is a large constant.

cs.LG↗