Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

N. Mankoc Borstnik

Publications and source records attributed to N. Mankoc Borstnik.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2005

An example of Kaluza-Klein-like theory with boundary conditions, which lead to massless and mass protected spinors chirally coupled to gauge fields

The genuine Kaluza-Klein-like theories (with no fields in addition to gravity) have difficulties with the existence of massless spinors after the ompactification of some of dimensions of space\cite{witten}. We assume a $M^{(1+3)} \times$ a flat finite disk in $(1+5)$-dimensional space, with the boundary allowing spinors of only one handedness. Massless spinors then chirally couple to the corresponding background gauge gravitational field, which solves equations of motion for a free field, linear in the Riemann curvature.

hep-th↗
arXiv2004

Proceedings to the 7th Workshop 'What Comes Beyond the Standard Models', 19. - 31. July 2004, Bled, Slovenia

1. Predictions for Four Generations of Quarks Suggested by the Approach Unifying Spins and Charges (M. Breskvar, J. Mravlje, N.Mankoc Borstnik), 2. No-scale Supergravity and the Multiple Point Principle (C.Froggatt, L.Laperashvili, R.Nevzorov, H.B.Nielsen), 3. The Two-Higgs Doublet Model and the Multiple Point Principle (C.Froggatt, L.Laperashvili, R.Nevzorov, H.B.Nielsen, M.Sher), 4. New Physics From a Dynamical Volume Element (E. Guendelman, A. Kaganovich, E. Nissimov and S. Pacheva), 5. Randomness in Random Dynamics (A. Kleppe), 6. An Example of Kaluza-Klein-like Theories Leading After Compactification to Massless Spinors Coupled to a Gauge Field-Derivations and Proofs (N. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. Nielsen and D. Lukman), 7. Geometry Decides Gravity, Demanding General Relativity-it is Thus the Quantum Theory of Gravity (R. Mirman), 8. Physics Would Be Impossible in Any Dimension But 3+1 - There Could Be Only Empty Universes (R. Mirman),9. Conservation of Energy Prohibits Proton Decay (R. Mirman), 10. Approximate Solutions for the Higgs Masses and Couplings in the NMSSM (R. Nevzorov and D.J. Miller)

hep-ph↗
arXiv2004

Proceedings to the 'Euroconference on Symmetries Beyond the Standard Model', 12. - 17. July 2003, Portoroz, Slovenia (Part 1 of 2)

Contents of Part 1: 1. Status of the Standard Model(P.H. Frampton), 2. Cosmological Constraints from MBA and Polarization (A. Melchiorri), 3. AdS/CFT Correspondence and Unification at About 4 TeV (P.H. Frampton), 4. New Solutions in String Field Theory (L. Bonora), 5. The Approach Unifying Spins and Charges (A. Borstnik Bracic and N. Mankoc Borstnik) 6. An Example ... (N. Mankoc Borstnik and H.B. Nielsen) 7. Hierarchy Problem and a New Bound State (C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen) 8. What Comes Next? (Q. Shafi) 9. Loops Versus Strings (E. Alvarez) 10. Fuzzy Two-dimensional Spaces (F. Lizzi) (Contents of Part 2: 11. Supersymmetric Grandunification and Fermion Masses (B. Bajc) 12. General Principles of Brane Kinematics and Dynamics (M. Pavsic) 13. Cosmological Neutrinos (G. Mangano) 14. The Problem of Mass (C.D. Froggatt) 15. How to Approach Quantum Gravity ... (D. Grumiller and W. Kummer) 16. Hidden Spacetime Symmetries and Generalized Holonomy in M-theory (M.J. Duff and J.T. Liu) 17. On the Resolution of Space-Time Singularities II (M. Maceda and J. Madore) 18. The Multiple Point Principle (D.L. Bennett and H.B. Nielsen) 19. Dynamics of Glue-Balls in N = 1 SYM Theory (L. Bergamin) 20. Quantization of Systems with Continuous Symmetries ... (M.V. Chichikina) 21. Singular Compactifications and Cosmology (L. Jaerv, T. Mohaupt and F. Saueressig) 22. Fundamental Physics and Lorentz Violation (R. Lehnert) 23. Functional Approach to Squeezed States ... (L. Musongela) 24. Constraining the Curvaton Scenario (M. Postma) 25. D-Branes and Unitarity of Noncommutative Field Theories (A. Torrielli) 26. Spinorial Cohomology and Supersymmetry (D. Tsimpis))

hep-ph↗
arXiv2003

How to generate families of spinors

Using a technique \cite{holgernorma2002} to construct a basis for spinors and ``families'' of spinors in terms of Clifford algebra objects, we define other Clifford algebra objects, which transform the state of one ''family'' of spinors into the state of another ''family'' of spinors, changing nothing but the ''family'' number. The proposed transformation works - as does the technique - for all dimensions and any signature and might open a path to understanding families of quarks and leptons\cite{norma92,norma93,normaixtapa2001,pikanorma2002}.

hep-th↗
arXiv2003

Proceedings to the workshops 'What comes beyond the Standard model', 2000, 2001, 2002, Volume 2: Proceedings (Part I)

Contents (Part 1): 1.Derivation of Lorentz Invariance and Three Space Dimensions in Generic Field Theory (C D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen) 2.Unitary Representations, Noncompact Groups SO(q; d - q)...(N. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. Nielsen and D. Lukman) 3.Weyl Spinor of SO(1; 13), Families of Spinors ...(A. Borstnik Bracic and N. Mankoc Borstnik) 4.A Tight Packing Problem (A. Kleppe) 5.Why so Few Particle Species? ... (D.L. Bennett and A. Kleppe) 6.About Number of Families (D. Lukman, A. Kleppe and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik) 7.Coupling Constant Unification in Spin-Charge Unifying Model ....(N. Mankoc Borstnik and H. B. Nielsen) (Contents of Part 2 [hep-ph/0301030]: 8.Renormalization of Coupling Constants in the Minimal SUSY Models (R. B. Nevzorov, K. A. Ter-Martirosyan and M. A. Trusov) 9.Multiple Point Model and Phase Transition Couplings ...(L.V. Laperashvili, D.A. Ryzhikh and H.B. Nielsen) 10.Family Replicated Fit of All Quark and Lepton Masses and Mixings (H. B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi) 11.Family Replicated Calculation of Baryogenesis (H. B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi) 12. Neutrino Oscillations in Vacuum on the Large Distance (D.A. Ryzhikh and K.A. Ter-Martirosyan) 13. Possibility of an Additional Source of Time Reversal Violation for Neutrinos (R. Erdem) 14.Quark-Lepton Masses and the Neutrino Puzzle in the AGUT Model (C.D. Froggatt) 15.Neutrinos in the Family Replicated Gauge Group Model (C.D. Froggatt))

hep-ph↗
arXiv2003

Proceedings to the workshops 'What comes beyond the Standard model', 2000, 2001, 2002, Volume 2: Proceedings (Part II)

Contents (Part 2): 8.Renormalization of Coupling Constants in the Minimal SUSY Models (R. B. Nevzorov, K. A. Ter-Martirosyan and M. A. Trusov) 9.Multiple Point Model and Phase Transition Couplings ...(L.V. Laperashvili, D.A. Ryzhikh and H.B. Nielsen) 10.Family Replicated Fit of All Quark and Lepton Masses and Mixings (H. B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi) 11.Family Replicated Calculation of Baryogenesis (H. B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi) 12. Neutrino Oscillations in Vacuum on the Large Distance (D.A. Ryzhikh and K.A. Ter-Martirosyan) 13. Possibility of an Additional Source of Time Reversal Violation for Neutrinos (R. Erdem) 14.Quark-Lepton Masses and the Neutrino Puzzle in the AGUT Model (C.D. Froggatt) 15.Neutrinos in the Family Replicated Gauge Group Model (C.D. Froggatt) (Contents of Part 1 [hep-ph/0301029]: 1.Derivation of Lorentz Invariance and Three Space Dimensions in Generic Field Theory (C D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen) 2.Unitary Representations, Noncompact Groups SO(q; d - q)...(N. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. Nielsen and D. Lukman) 3.Weyl Spinor of SO(1; 13), Families of Spinors ...(A. Borstnik Bracic and N. Mankoc Borstnik) 4.A Tight Packing Problem (A. Kleppe) 5.Why so Few Particle Species? ... (D.L. Bennett and A. Kleppe) 6.About Number of Families (D. Lukman, A. Kleppe and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik) 7.Coupling Constant Unification in Spin-Charge Unifying Model ....(N. Mankoc Borstnik and H. B. Nielsen))

hep-ph↗
arXiv2002

Why Nature has made a choice of one time and three space coordinates?

We propose a possible answer to one of the most exciting open questions in physics and cosmology, that is the question why we seem to experience four- dimensional space-time with three ordinary and one time dimensions. We have known for more than 70 years that (elementary) particles have spin degrees of freedom, we also know that besides spin they also have charge degrees of freedom, both degrees of freedom in addition to the position and momentum degrees of freedom. We may call these ''internal degrees of freedom '' the ''internal space'' and we can think of all the different particles, like quarks and leptons, as being different internal states of the same particle. The question then naturally arises: Is the choice of the Minkowski metric and the four-dimensional space-time influenced by the ''internal space''? Making assumptions (such as particles being in first approximation massless) about the equations of motion, we argue for restrictions on the number of space and time dimensions. (Actually the Standard model predicts and experiments confirm that elementary particles are massless until interactions switch on masses.) Accepting our explanation of the space-time signature and the number of dimensions would be a point supporting (further) the importance of the ''internal space''.

hep-ph↗
arXiv2000

Why odd-space and odd-time dimensions in even-dimesional spaces?

We are answering the question why 4-dimensional space has the metric 1+3 by making a general argument from a certain type of equations of motion linear in momentum for any spin (except spin zero) in any even dimension d. All known free equations for non-zero spin for massless fields belong to this type of equations. Requiring Hermiticity(This is a generalization of an earlier work which shows that without assuming the Lorentz invariance -which in the present work is assumed- the Weyl equation follows using Hermiticity.) of the equations of motion operator as well as irreducibility with respect to the Lorentz group representation, we prove that only metrics with the signature corresponding to q time + (d - q) space dimensions with q being odd exist. Correspondingly, in four dimensional space, Nature could only make the realization of 1+3 dimensional space.

hep-ph↗
arXiv2000

The Majorana particles and the Majorana sea

Can one make a Majorana field theory for fermions starting from the zero mass Weyl theory, then adding a mass term as an interaction? The answer to this question is: yes we can. We can proceed similarly to the case of the Dirac massive field theory. In both cases one can start from the zero mass Weyl theory and then add a mass term as an interacting term of massless particles with a constant (external) field. In both cases the interaction gives rise to a field theory for a free massive fermion field. We present the procedure for the creation of a mass term in the case of the Dirac and the Majorana field and we look for a massive field as a superposition of massless fields.

hep-th↗
arXiv2000

Unification of spins and charges in Grassmann space and in space of differential forms

Polynomials in Grassmann space can be used to describe all the internal degrees of freedom of spinors, scalars and vectors, that is their spins and charges. It was shown that Kähler spinors, which are polynomials of differential forms, can be generalized to describe not only spins of spinors but also spins of vectors as well as spins and charges of scalars, vectors and spinors. If the space (ordinary and noncommutative) has 14 dimensions or more, the appropriate spontaneous break of symmetry leads gravity in $d$ dimensions to manifest in four dimensional subspace as ordinary gravity and all needed gauge fields as well as the Yukawa couplings. Both approaches, the Kähler's one (if generalized) and our, manifest four generations of massless fermions, which are left handed SU(2) doublets and right handed SU(2) singlets. In this talk a possible way of spontaneously broken symmetries is pointed out on the level of canonical momentum.

hep-th↗
arXiv1999

Dirac-Kähler approach connected to quantum mechanics in Grassmann space

We compare the way one of us got spinors out of fields, which are a priori antisymmetric tensor fields, to the Dirac-Kähler rewriting. Since using our Grassmann formulation is simple it may be useful in describing the Dirac-Kähler formulation of spinors and in generalizing it to vector internal degrees of freedom and to charges. The ``cheat'' concerning the Lorentz transformations for spinors is the same in both cases and is put clearly forward in the Grassmann formulation. Also the generalizations are clearly pointed out. The discrete symmetries are discussed, in particular the appearance of two kinds of the time-reversal operators as well as the unavoidability of four families.

hep-th↗