SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Naeemul Hassan

Publications and source records attributed to Naeemul Hassan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

MOMENTA: Mixture-of-Experts Over Multimodal Embeddings with Neural Temporal Aggregation for Misinformation Detection

The widespread dissemination of multimodal content on social media has made misinformation detection increasingly challenging, as misleading narratives often arise not only from textual or visual content alone, but also from semantic inconsistencies between modalities and their evolution over time. Existing multimodal misinformation detection methods typically model cross-modal interactions statically and often show limited robustness across heterogeneous datasets, domains, and narrative settings. To address these challenges, we propose MOMENTA, a unified framework for multimodal misinformation detection that captures modality heterogeneity, cross-modal inconsistency, temporal dynamics, and cross-domain generalization within a single architecture. MOMENTA employs modality-specific mixture-of-experts modules to model diverse misinformation patterns, bidirectional co-attention to align textual and visual representations in a shared semantic space, and a discrepancy-aware branch to explicitly capture semantic disagreement between modalities. To model narrative evolution, we introduce an attention-based temporal aggregation mechanism with drift and momentum encoding over overlapping time windows, enabling the framework to capture both short-term fluctuations and longer-term trends in misinformation propagation. In addition, domain-adversarial learning and a prototype memory bank improve domain invariance and stabilize representation learning across datasets. The model is trained using a multi-objective optimization strategy that jointly enforces classification performance, cross-modal alignment, contrastive learning, temporal consistency, and domain robustness. Experiments on Fakeddit, MMCoVaR, Weibo, and XFacta show that MOMENTA achieves strong, consistent results across accuracy, F1-score, AUC, and MCC, highlighting its effectiveness for multimodal misinformation detection.

cs.MM

A Survey of Information Disorder on Video-Sharing Platforms

Video sharing platforms (VSPs) have become central information hubs but also facilitate the spread of information disorder, from misleading narratives to fabricated content. This survey synthesizes research on VSPs' multimedia ecosystems across three dimensions: (1) types of information disorder, (2) methodological approaches, and (3) platform features. We conclude by identifying key challenges and open questions for future research.

cs.MM

Semantic-based Unsupervised Framing Analysis (SUFA): A Novel Approach for Computational Framing Analysis

This research presents a novel approach to computational framing analysis, called Semantic Relations-based Unsupervised Framing Analysis (SUFA). SUFA leverages semantic relations and dependency parsing algorithms to identify and assess entity-centric emphasis frames in news media reports. This innovative method is derived from two studies -- qualitative and computational -- using a dataset related to gun violence, demonstrating its potential for analyzing entity-centric emphasis frames. This article discusses SUFA's strengths, limitations, and application procedures. Overall, the SUFA approach offers a significant methodological advancement in computational framing analysis, with its broad applicability across both the social sciences and computational domains.

cs.CL

LlamaLens: Specialized Multilingual LLM for Analyzing News and Social Media Content

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success as general-purpose task solvers across various fields. However, their capabilities remain limited when addressing domain-specific problems, particularly in downstream NLP tasks. Research has shown that models fine-tuned on instruction-based downstream NLP datasets outperform those that are not fine-tuned. While most efforts in this area have primarily focused on resource-rich languages like English and broad domains, little attention has been given to multilingual settings and specific domains. To address this gap, this study focuses on developing a specialized LLM, LlamaLens, for analyzing news and social media content in a multilingual context. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to tackle both domain specificity and multilinguality, with a particular focus on news and social media. Our experimental setup includes 18 tasks, represented by 52 datasets covering Arabic, English, and Hindi. We demonstrate that LlamaLens outperforms the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) on 23 testing sets, and achieves comparable performance on 8 sets. We make the models and resources publicly available for the research community (https://huggingface.co/collections/QCRI/llamalens-672f7e0604a0498c6a2f0fe9).

cs.CL

Exploring the Potential of the Large Language Models (LLMs) in Identifying Misleading News Headlines

In the digital age, the prevalence of misleading news headlines poses a significant challenge to information integrity, necessitating robust detection mechanisms. This study explores the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in identifying misleading versus non-misleading news headlines. Utilizing a dataset of 60 articles, sourced from both reputable and questionable outlets across health, science & tech, and business domains, we employ three LLMs- ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Gemini-for classification. Our analysis reveals significant variance in model performance, with ChatGPT-4 demonstrating superior accuracy, especially in cases with unanimous annotator agreement on misleading headlines. The study emphasizes the importance of human-centered evaluation in developing LLMs that can navigate the complexities of misinformation detection, aligning technical proficiency with nuanced human judgment. Our findings contribute to the discourse on AI ethics, emphasizing the need for models that are not only technically advanced but also ethically aligned and sensitive to the subtleties of human interpretation.

cs.CL

Towards Designing a Question-Answering Chatbot for Online News: Understanding Questions and Perspectives

Large Language Models (LLMs) have created opportunities for designing chatbots that can support complex question-answering (QA) scenarios and improve news audience engagement. However, we still lack an understanding of what roles journalists and readers deem fit for such a chatbot in newsrooms. To address this gap, we first interviewed six journalists to understand how they answer questions from readers currently and how they want to use a QA chatbot for this purpose. To understand how readers want to interact with a QA chatbot, we then conducted an online experiment (N=124) where we asked each participant to read three news articles and ask questions to either the author(s) of the articles or a chatbot. By combining results from the studies, we present alignments and discrepancies between how journalists and readers want to use QA chatbots and propose a framework for designing effective QA chatbots in newsrooms.

cs.HC

Not all Fake News is Written: A Dataset and Analysis of Misleading Video Headlines

Polarization and the marketplace for impressions have conspired to make navigating information online difficult for users, and while there has been a significant effort to detect false or misleading text, multimodal datasets have received considerably less attention. To complement existing resources, we present multimodal Video Misleading Headline (VMH), a dataset that consists of videos and whether annotators believe the headline is representative of the video's contents. After collecting and annotating this dataset, we analyze multimodal baselines for detecting misleading headlines. Our annotation process also focuses on why annotators view a video as misleading, allowing us to better understand the interplay of annotators' background and the content of the videos.

cs.CL

Combating Misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and Responsibilities as Perceived by Journalists, Fact-checkers, and Users

There has been a growing interest within CSCW community in understanding the characteristics of misinformation propagated through computational media, and the devising techniques to address the associated challenges. However, most work in this area has been concentrated on the cases in the western world leaving a major portion of this problem unaddressed that is situated in the Global South. This paper aims to broaden the scope of this discourse by focusing on this problem in the context of Bangladesh, a country in the Global South. The spread of misinformation on Facebook in Bangladesh, a country with a population over 163 million, has resulted in chaos, hate attacks, and killings. By interviewing journalists, fact-checkers, in addition to surveying the general public, we analyzed the current state of verifying misinformation in Bangladesh. Our findings show that most people in the `news audience' want the news media to verify the authenticity of online information that they see online. However, the newspaper journalists say that fact-checking online information is not a part of their job, and it is also beyond their capacity given the amount of information being published online everyday. We further find that the voluntary fact-checkers in Bangladesh are not equipped with sufficient infrastructural support to fill in this gap. We show how our findings are connected to some of the core concerns of CSCW community around social media, collaboration, infrastructural politics, and information inequality. From our analysis, we also suggest several pathways to increase the impact of fact-checking efforts through collaboration, technology design, and infrastructure development.

cs.CY

Towards Domain-Specific Characterization of Misinformation

The rapid dissemination of health misinformation poses an increasing risk to public health. To best understand the way of combating health misinformation, it is important to acknowledge how the fundamental characteristics of misinformation differ from domain to domain. This paper presents a pathway towards domain-specific characterization of misinformation so that we can address the concealed behavior of health misinformation compared to others and take proper initiative accordingly for combating it. With this aim, we have mentioned several possible approaches to identify discriminating features of medical misinformation from other types of misinformation. Thereafter, we briefly propose a research plan followed by possible challenges to meet up. The findings of the proposed research idea will provide new directions to the misinformation research community.

cs.CY

A Benchmark Dataset of Check-worthy Factual Claims

In this paper we present the ClaimBuster dataset of 23,533 statements extracted from all U.S. general election presidential debates and annotated by human coders. The ClaimBuster dataset can be leveraged in building computational methods to identify claims that are worth fact-checking from the myriad of sources of digital or traditional media. The ClaimBuster dataset is publicly available to the research community, and it can be found at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3609356.

cs.CL

Automatically Assessing Quality of Online Health Articles

The information ecosystem today is overwhelmed by an unprecedented quantity of data on versatile topics are with varied quality. However, the quality of information disseminated in the field of medicine has been questioned as the negative health consequences of health misinformation can be life-threatening. There is currently no generic automated tool for evaluating the quality of online health information spanned over a broad range. To address this gap, in this paper, we applied a data mining approach to automatically assess the quality of online health articles based on 10 quality criteria. We have prepared a labeled dataset with 53012 features and applied different feature selection methods to identify the best feature subset with which our trained classifier achieved an accuracy of 84%-90% varied over 10 criteria. Our semantic analysis of features shows the underpinning associations between the selected features & assessment criteria and further rationalize our assessment approach. Our findings will help in identifying high-quality health articles and thus aiding users in shaping their opinion to make the right choice while picking health-related help from online.

cs.CY

Examining the Role of Clickbait Headlines to Engage Readers with Reliable Health-related Information

Clickbait headlines are frequently used to attract readers to read articles. Although this headline type has turned out to be a technique to engage readers with misleading items, it is still unknown whether the technique can be used to attract readers to reliable pieces. This study takes the opportunity to test its efficacy to engage readers with reliable health articles. A set of online surveys would be conducted to test readers' engagement with and perception about clickbait headlines with reliable articles. After that, we would design an automation system to generate clickabit headlines to maximize user engagement.

cs.CL

Towards Automated Sexual Violence Report Tracking

Tracking sexual violence is a challenging task. In this paper, we present a supervised learning-based automated sexual violence report tracking model that is more scalable, and reliable than its crowdsource based counterparts. We define the sexual violence report tracking problem by considering victim, perpetrator contexts and the nature of the violence. We find that our model could identify sexual violence reports with a precision and recall of 80.4% and 83.4%, respectively. Moreover, we also applied the model during and after the \#MeToo movement. Several interesting findings are discovered which are not easily identifiable from a shallow analysis.

cs.SI

Understanding the Silence of Sexual Harassment Victims Through the #WhyIDidntReport Movement

Sexual violence is a serious problem across the globe. A lot of victims, particularly women, go through this experience. Unfortunately, not all of these violent incidents come to public. A large portion of victims don't disclose their experience. On the September of 2018, people started revealing in Twitter why they didn't report a sexual violence experience using a hashtag #WhyIDidntReport. We collect about 40K such tweets and conduct a large-scale supervised analysis of why victims don't report. Our study finds the extent to which people shared their reasons as well as categorizes the reasons into finer reasons. We also analyze user engaged with the victims and compare our findings with existing literature.

cs.SI

Can Women Break the Glass Ceiling?: An Analysis of #MeToo Hashtagged Posts on Twitter

In October 2017, there happened the uprising of an unprecedented online movement on social media by women across the world who started publicly sharing their untold stories of being sexually harassed along with the hashtag #MeToo (or some variants of it). Those stories did not only strike the silence that had long hid the perpetrators, but also allowed women to discharge some of their bottled-up grievances, and revealed many important information surrounding sexual harassment. In this paper, we present our analysis of about one million such tweets collected between October 15 and October 31, 2017 that reveals some interesting patterns and attributes of the people, place, emotions, actions, and reactions related to the tweeted stories. Based on our analysis, we also advance the discussion on the potential role of online social media in breaking the silence of women by factoring in the strengths and limitations of these platforms.

cs.SI

Fact-checking Initiatives in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal: A Study of User Engagement and Challenges

Fake news and misinformation spread in developing countries as fast as they do in developed countries with increasing penetration of the internet and social media. However, fighting misinformation is more difficult in developing countries where resources and necessary technologies are scarce. This study provides an understanding of the challenges various fact-checking initiatives face in three South Asian countries--Bangladesh, India, and Nepal. In-depth interviews were conducted with senior editors of six fact-checking initiatives. Challenges identified include lack of resources, technologies, and political pressure. An analysis of Facebook pages of these initiatives shows increasing user engagement with their posts.

cs.CY

Differences between Health Related News Articles from Reliable and Unreliable Media

In this study, we examine a collection of health-related news articles published by reliable and unreliable media outlets. Our analysis shows that there are structural, topical, and semantic differences in the way reliable and unreliable media outlets conduct health journalism. We argue that the findings from this study will be useful for combating health disinformation problem.

cs.SI

A Large-scale Study of Social Media Sources in News Articles

In this study, we closely look at the use of social media contents as source or reference in the U.S. news media. Specifically, we examine about 60 thousand news articles published within the 5 years period of 2013-2017 by 153 U.S. media outlets and analyze use of social media content as source compared to other sources. We designed a social media source extraction algorithm and investigated the extent and nature of social media source usage across different news topics. Our results show that uses of social media content in news almost doubled in five years. Unreliable media outlets rely on social media more than the mainstream media. Both mainstream and unreliable sites prefer Twitter to Facebook as a source of information.

cs.SI